Fundamental processes leading to attitude change: Implications for cancer prevention communications

Journal of Communication

Volumn 56, Issue SUPPL., 2006, Pages

  Briñol, Pablo ^a   Petty, Richard E ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER; COMMUNICATION; HEALTH EDUCATION;

EID: 33746725879     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: 14602466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00284.x     Document Type: Review

References (134)

1. Abelson, R. P., Aronson, E., McGuire, W. J., Newcomb, Th. M., Rosenberg, M. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1968). Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook. Chicago: Rand McNally.
2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2), 179-210.
3. Alba, J. W., & Marmorstein, H. (1987). The effects of frequency knowledge on consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 411-454.
4. Apanovitch, A. M., McCarthy, D., & Salovey, P. (2003). Using message framing to motivate HIV testing among low-income, ethnic minority women. Health Psychology, 22 (1), 60-67.
5. Baker, S. M., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Majority and minority influence: Source advocacy as a determinant of message scrutiny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67 (1), 5-19.
6. Bakker, A. B. (1999). Persuasive communication about AIDS prevention: Need for cognition determines the impact of message format. AIDS Education and Prevention, 11 (2), 150-162.
7. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
8. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
9. Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.
10. Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2003). Overt head movements and persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1123-1139.
11. Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2004). Self-validation processes: The role of thought confidence in persuasion. In G. Haddock & G. Maio (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the psychology of attitudes (pp. 205-226). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
12. Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2005). Individual differences in persuasion. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes and attitude change (pp. 575-616). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., Gallardo, I., & DeMarree, K. G. (in press). The role of self-affirmation in consumer persuasion. Advances in Consumer Research.
14. Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., Horcajo, J., & Barden, J. (2006). The role of elaboration in the malleability of implicit attitudes. Manuscript submitted for publication.
15. Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., & Tormala, Z. L. (2004). The self-validation of cognitive responses to advertisements. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 559-573.
16. Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., & Wheeler, S. C. (in press). Discrepancies between explicit and implicit self-concepts: Consequences for information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
17. Brock, T. C., Brannon, L. A., & Bridgwater, C. (1990). Message effectiveness can be increased by matching appeals to recipients'self-schemas: Laboratory demonstrations and a national field experiment. In S. J. Agres & J. A. Edell (Eds.), Emotion in advertising: Theoretical and practical explorations (pp. 285-315). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
18. Brug, J., Glanz, K., Van Assema, P., Kok, G., & Van Breukelen, G. J. P. (1998). The impact of computer-tailored feedback and iterative feedback on fat, fruit, and vegetable intake. Health Education and Behavior, 25, 517-531.
19. Burnkrant, R., & Unnava, R. (1989). Self-referencing: A strategy for increasing processing of message content. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 628-638.
20. Cacioppo, J. T., Marshall-Goodell, B. S., Tassinary, L. G., & Petty, R. E. (1992). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes: Classical conditioning is more effective when prior knowledge about the attitude stimulus is low than high. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 207-233.
21. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42 (1), 116-131.
22. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1989). Effects of message repetition on argument processing, recall, and persuasion. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10 (1), 3-12.
23. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119 (2), 197-253.
24. Campbell, M. K., DeVellis, B. M., Strecher, V. J., Ammerman, A. S., DeVellis, R. R., & Sandler, R. S. (1994). Improving dietary behavior: The effectiveness of tailored messages in primary care settings. American Journal of Public Health, 84, 783-787.
25. Cesario, J., Grant, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from "feeling right."Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 388-404.
26. Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-756.
27. Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Chaiken, S., & Eagly, A. H. (1976). Communication modality as a determinant of message persuasiveness and message comprehensibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 605-614.
29. Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 460-473.
30. Chang, C. (2002). Self-congruency as a cue in different advertising-processing contexts. Communication Research, 29, 503-536.
31. DeBono, K. G. (1987). Investigating the social-adjustive and value-expressive functions of attitudes: Implications for persuasion processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 279-287.
32. DeBono, K. G., & Harnish, R. J. (1988). Source expertise, source attractiveness, and processing or persuasive information: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 541-546.
33. DeBono, K. G., & Snyder, A. (1992). Repressors, sensitizers, source expertise, and persuasion. Social Behavior and Personality, 20, 263-272.
34. Devos-Comby, L., & Salovey, P. (2002). Applying persuasion strategies to alter HIV-relevant thoughts and behaviors. Review of General Psychology, 6, 287-304.
35. Dijkstra, S., De Vries, J., Roijackers, J., & van Breukelen, G. (1998). Tailored interventions to communicate stage-matched information to smokers in different motivational stages. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 549-557.
36. Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, J. M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5 (3), 69-106.
37. Eagly A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
38. Epstein, S. (2003). Cognitive-experiential self-theory of personality. In T. Millon & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 159-184). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
39. Evans, L. M., & Petty, R. E. (2003). Self-guide framing and persuasion: Responsibly increasing message processing to ideal levels. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 313-324.
40. Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 75-109). New York: Academic Press.
41. Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013-1027.
42. Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and uses. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327.
43. Fazio, R. H., & Williams, C. J. (1986). Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behavior relations: An investigation of the 1984 presidential election. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 505-514.
44. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
45. Fishbein, M., & Cappella, J. N. (2006). The role of theory in developing effective health communications. Journal of Communication, 56, S1-S17.
46. Fleming, M. A., & Petty, R. E. (2000). Identity and persuasion: An elaboration likelihood approach. In M. A. Hogg & D. J. Terry (Eds.), Attitudes, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership (pp. 171-199). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Friedrich, J., Fetherstonhaugh, D., Casey, S., & Gallagher, D. (1996). Argument integration and attitude change: Suppression effects in the integration of one-sided arguments that vary in persuasiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22 (2), 179-191.
48. Geers, A. L., Handley, I. M., & McLarney, A. R. (2003). Discerning the role of optimism in persuasion: The valence-enhancement hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 554-565.
49. Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102 (1), 4-27.
50. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
51. Harkins, S. G., & Petty, R. E. (1981). The effects of source magnification cognitive effort on attitudes: An information processing view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 401-413.
52. Heesacker, M., Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1983). Field dependence and attitude change: Source credibility can alter persuasion by affecting message-relevant thinking. Journal of Personality, 51, 653-666.
53. Helweg-Larse, M., & Collins, B. E. (1997). A social psychological perspective on the role of knowledge about AIDS and AIDS prevention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6 (1), 23-26.
54. Herek, G. M., Gillis, J. R., Glunt, E. K., Lewis, J., Welton, D., & Capitanio, J. P. (1998). Culturally sensitive AIDS educational videos for African American audiences: Effects of source, message, receiver, and context. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 705-743.
55. Howard, D. J. (1990). Rhetorical question effects on message processing and persuasion: The role of information availability and the elicitation of judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 217-239.
56. Kreuter, M. W., Farrell, D., Olevitch, L., & Brennan, L. (2000). What is tailored communication? In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Tailoring health messages: Customizing communication with computer technology (pp. 1-23). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
57. Kreuter, M. W., Strecher, V. J., & Glassman, B. (1999). One size does not fit all: The case for tailoring print materials. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 276-283.
58. Lavine, H., & Snyder, M. (1996). Cognitive processing and the functional matching effect in persuasion. The mediating role of subjective perceptions of message quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 580-604.
59. Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86 (2), 205-218.
60. Lee, A. Y., Aaker, J. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2000). The pleasures and pains of distinct self-construals: The role of interdependence in regulatory focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1122-1134.
61. Leventhal, H., & Cleary, P. D. (1980). The smoking problem: A review of the research and theory in behavioral risk modifications. Psychological Bulleting, 88, 370-405.
62. Maio, G. R., Bell, D. E., & Esses, V. M. (1996). Ambivalence and persuasion: The processing of messages about immigrant groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 513-536.
63. McClelland, D. C. (1985). How motives, skills, and values determine what people do. American Psychologist, 40, 812-825.
64. Moon, Y. (2002). Personalization and personality: Some effects of customizing message style based on consumer personality. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12, 313-326.
65. Moore, D. L., Hausknecht, D., & Thamodaran, K. (1986). Time pressure, response opportunity, and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (1), 85-99.
66. Moore, D. L., & Reardon, R. (1987). Source magnification: The role of multiple sources in processing of advertising appeals. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 412-417.
67. Orbell, S. Perugini, M., & Rakow, T. (2004). Individual differences in sensitivity to health communications: Consideration of future consequences. Heath Psychology, 23, 388-396.
68. Pacini, R., & Epstein, S. (1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ration-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 972-987.
69. Palmgreen, P., Stephenson, M. T., Everett, M. W., Baseheart, J. R., & Francies, R. (2002). Perceived message sensation value (PMSV) and the dimensions and validation of a PMSV scale. Health Communication, 14, 403-428.
70. Petty, R. E., Baker, S., & Gleicher, F. (1991). Attitudes and drug abuse prevention: Implications of the Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion. In L. Donohew, H. E. Sypher, & W. J. Bukoski (Eds.), Persuasive communication and drug abuse prevention (pp. 71-90). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
71. Petty, R. E., Barden, J., & Wheeler, S. C. (2002). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In R. J. DiClemente, R. A. Crosby, & M. Kegler (Eds.), Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research (pp. 71-99). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
72. Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2002). Attitude change: The Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion. In G. Bartels & W. Nielissen (Eds.), Marketing for sustainability: Towards transactional policy making (pp. 176-190). Amsterdam: IOS press.
73. Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (in press). A meta-cognitive approach to "implicit"and "explicit"evaluations: Comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006). Psychological Bulletin.
74. Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., & Tormala, Z. L. (2002). Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: The self-validation hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 722-741.
75. Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., Tormala, Z. L., & Wegener, D. T. (in press). The role of meta-cognition in social psychology. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: A handbook of basic principles (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
76. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979). Effects of forewarning of persuasive intent on cognitive responses and persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5 (2), 173-176.
77. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classics and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: Win. C. Brown.
78. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984a). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46 (1), 69-81.
79. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984b). Source factors and the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 668-672.
80. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
81. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1990). Involvement and persuasion: Tradition versus integration. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 367-374.
82. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847-855.
83. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Heesacker, M. (1981). The use of rhetorical questions in persuasion: A cognitive response analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 432-440.
84. Petty, R. E., Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2003). Emotional factors in attitudes and persuasion. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 752-772). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
85. Petty, R. E., Haugtvedt, C., & Smith, S. M. (1995). Elaboration as a determinant of attitude strength: Creating attitudes that are persistent, resistant, and predictive of behavior. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 93-130). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
86. Petty, R. E., & Krosnick, J. A. (Eds.). (1995). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
87. Petty, R. E., Ostrom, T. M. & Brock, T. C. (1981). Cognitive responses in persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
88. Petty, R. E., Priester, J. R., & Briñol, P. (2002). Mass media attitude change: Implications of the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 155-199). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
89. Petty, R. E., Schumann, D. W., Richman, S. A., & Strathman, A. J. (1993). Positive mood and persuasion: Different roles for affect under high and low elaboration conditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64 (1), 5-20.
90. Petty, R. E., Tormala, Z. L., Briñol, P., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (2006). Implicit ambivalence from attitude change: An exploration of the PAST model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90 (1), 21-41.
91. Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1993). Flexible correction processes in social judgment: Correcting for context induced contrast. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29 (2), 137-165.
92. Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998a). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 323-390). New York: McGraw-Hill.
93. Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998b). Matching versus mismatching attitude functions: Implications for scrutiny of persuasive messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 227-240.
94. Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1999). The Elaboration Likelihood Model: Current status and controversies. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 41-72). New York: Guilford Press.
95. Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & White, P. (1998). Flexible correction processes in social judgment: Implications for persuasion. Social Cognition, 16 (1), 93-113.
96. Petty, R. E., Wells, G. L., & Brock, T. C. (1976). Distraction can enhance or reduce yielding to propaganda: Thought disruption versus effort justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 874-884.
97. Petty, R. E., Wheeler, S. C., & Bizer, G. (2000). Matching effects in persuasion: An elaboration likelihood analysis. In G. Maio & J. Olson (Eds.), Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes (pp. 133-162). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
98. Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992). In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behavior. American Psychologist, 47, 1102-1114.
99. Proshansky, H. M. (1943). A projective method for the study of attitudes. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 393-395.
100. Puckett, J., Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Fisher, D. (1983). The relative impact of age and attractiveness stereotypes on persuasion. Journal of Gerontology, 38, 340-343.
101. Rakowski, W., Ehrich, B., Goldstein, M. G., Rimer, B. K., Pearlman, D. N., Clark, M. A., et al. 1998). Increasing mammography among women aged 40-74 by use of stage-matched, tailored intervention. Preventive Medicine, 27, 748-756.
102. Rimer, B. K., & Kreuter, M. W. (2006). Advancing tailored health communication: A persuasion and message effects perspective. Journal of Communication, 56, S184-S201.
103. Rosenthal, L., & Epstein, S. (2000). Rational and experiential thinking styles as related to receptivity to messages syntonic and dystonic with thinking style. Unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
104. Rothman, A. J. (2000). Toward a theory-based analysis of behavioral maintenance. Health Psychology, 19 (Suppl. 1), 64-69.
105. Rothman, A. J., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Constructing perceptions of vulnerability: Personal relevance and the use of experiential information in health judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1053-1064.
106. Rothman, A. J., Salovey, P., Antone, C., Keough, K., & Martin, C. D. (1993). The influence of message framing on intentions to perform health behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 408-433.
107. Rothman, A. J., Salovey, P., Turvey, C., & Fishkins, S. A. (1993). Attributions of responsibility and persuasion: Increasing mammography utilization among women over 40 with an internally oriented message. Health Psychology, 12 (1), 39-47.
108. Salovey, P., & Rothman, A. J. (2003). Social psychology of health: Key readings. New York: Psychology Press.
109. Sherman, D. A. K., Nelson, L. D., & Steele, C. M. (2000). Do messages about health risk threaten the self? Increasing the acceptance of threatening health messages via self-affirmation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1046-1058.
110. Skinner, C. S., Strecher, V. J., & Hospers, H. (1994). Physicians recommendations for mammography: Do tailored messages make a difference? American Journal of Public Health, 84 (1), 43-49.
111. Smith, S. M., & Petty, R. E. (1996). Message framing and persuasion: A message processing analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 257-268.
112. Smith, S. M., & Shaffer, D. R. (1991). Celebrity and cajolery: Rapid speech may promote or inhibit persuasion via its impact on message elaboration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 663-669.
113. Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537.
114. Snyder, M., & DeBono, K. G. (1985). Appeals to image and claims about quality: Understanding the psychology of advertising. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 586-597.
115. Snyder, M., & DeBono, K. G. (1989). Understanding the functions of attitudes: Lessons from personality and social behavior. In A. Pratkanis, S. Breckler, & A. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 339-359). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
116. Sorrentino, R. M., Bobocel, D. R., Gitta, M. Z., Olson, J. M., & Hewitt, E. C. (1988). Uncertainty orientation and persuasion: Individual differences in the effects of personal relevance on social judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 357-371.
117. Staats, A. W., & Staats, C. (1958). Attitudes established by classical conditioning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67 (1), 159-167.
118. Stiff, J. B. (1986). Cognitive processing of persuasive message cues: A meta-analytic review of the effects of supporting information on attitudes. Communication Monographs, 53 (1), 75-89.
119. Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220-247.
120. Strathman, D., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742-752.
121. Swasy, J. L., & Munch, J. M. (1985). Examining the target of receiver elaborations: Rhetorical question effects on source processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 877-886.
122. Tormala, Z. L., Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (in press). When credibility attacks: The reverse impact of source credibility on persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
123. Tormala, Z. L., Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2002). Ease of retrieval effects in persuasion: The roles of elaboration and thought-confidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1700-1712.
124. Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Flexible correction processes in social judgment: The role of naive theories in corrections for perceived bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68 (1), 36-51.
125. Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1997). The flexible correction model: The role of naïve theories in bias correction. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 141-208). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
126. Weinstein, N. D. (2003). Exploring the links between risk perceptions and preventive health behavior. In J. Suls & K. Wallston (Eds.), Social psychological foundations of health and illness (pp. 22-53). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
127. Wheeler, S. C., Petty, R. E., & Bizer, G. Y. (2005). Self-schema matching and attitude change: Situational and dispositional determinants of message elaboration. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 787-797.
128. Williams-Piehota, P., Pizarro, J., Schneider, T. R., Mowad, L., & Salovey, P. (2005). Matching health messages to monitor-blunter coping styles to motivate screening mammography. Health Psychology, 24 (1), 58-67.
129. Williams-Piehota, P., Schneider, T. R., Pizarro, J., Mowad, L., & Salovey, P. (2003). Matching health messages to information-processing styles: Need for cognition and mammography utilization. Health Communication, 15, 375-392.
130. Williams-Piehota, P., Schneider, T. R., Pizarro, J., Mowad, L., & Salovey, P. (2004). Matching health messages to health locus of control beliefs for promoting mammography utilization. Psychology and Health, 19, 407-423.
131. Wilson, T. D., & Brekke, N. (1994). Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 116 (1), 117-142.
132. Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107 (1), 101-126.
133. Wood, W. (1982). Retrieval of attitude relevant information from memory: Effects on susceptibility to persuasion and on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 798-810.
134. Wright, P. L. (1981). Cognitive responses to mass media advocacy. In R. E. Petty, T. M. Ostrom, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion (pp. 263-282). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.