The phylogeny and classification of Neuropogon and Usnea (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota) revisited

Taxon

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 367-376

  Wirtz, Nora ^a,b,c   Printzen, Christian ^a   Sancho, Leopoldo G ^d   Lumbsch, H Thorsten ^c  

^a SENCKENBERG RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

^c FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bayesian statistics; ITS rDNA; Lichens; Neuropogon; Parmeliaceae; Phylogeny; Usnea

Indexed keywords

LICHEN; NOMENCLATURE; PHYLOGENY; RECONSTRUCTION; TAXONOMY;

ASCOMYCOTA; NEUROPOGON; PARMELIACEAE; USNEA; USNEA ACANTHELLA; USNEA DURIETZII;

EID: 33745856595     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/25065584     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Articus, K. 2004. Neuropogon and the phylogeny of Usnea s.l. (Parmeliaceae, lichenized ascomycetes). Taxon 53: 925-934.
2. Blanco, O., Crespo, A., Elix, J. A., Hawksworth, D. L. & Lumbsch, H. T. 2004. A new classification of parmelioid lichens containing Xanthoparmelia-type lichenan (Ascomycota: Lecanorales) based on morphological and molecular evidence. Taxon 53: 959-975.
3. Du Rietz, G. E. 1926. Om släktena Evernia Ach., Letharia (Th. Fr.) Zahlbr. emend DR. och Usnea Ach. subgenus Neuropogon (Nees et Flot.) Jatta. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 20: 89-93.
4. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
5. Galloway, D. J. 1983. New taxa in the New Zealand lichen flora. New Zeal. J. Bot. 6: 191-200.
6. Gardes, M. & Bruns, T. D. 1993. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes - application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Molec. Ecol. 2: 113-118.
7. Huelsenbeck, J. P., Ronquist, F., Nielsen, R. & Bollback, J. P. 2001. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294: 2310-2314.
8. Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Ronquist, F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
9. Hughey, R. & Krogh, A. 1996. Hidden Markov models for sequence analysis: Extension and analysis of the basic method. Comp. Appl. Bio. 12: 95-107.
10. Huneck, S., Sainsbury, M., Rickard, T. M. A. & Lewis Smith, R. I. 1984. Ecological and chemical investigations of lichens from South Gorgia and the maritime Antarctic. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 56: 461-480.
11. Ihlen, P. G. & Ekman, S. 2002. Outline of phylogeny and character evolution in Rhizocarpon (Rhizocarpaceae, lichenized Ascomycota) based on nuclear ITS and mitochondrial SSU ribosomal DNA sequences. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 77: 535-546.
12. Jatta, A. 1900. Sylloge Lichenum Italicorum. Trani.
13. Jahns, H. M. & Ott, S. 1994. Thalli mycelial and cytological characters in ascomycete systematics. Pp. 57-62 in: Hawksworth, D. L. (ed.), Ascomycete Systematics. Problems and Perspectives in the Nineties. NATO Advanced Science Institute Series, Plenum Press, New York.
14. Kappen, L. 1993. Lichens in the Antarctic region. Pp. 433-490 in: Friedman, E. I. (ed.), Antarctic Microbiology. New York, Wiley-Liss.
15. Kirk, P. M., Cannon, P. F., David, J. C. & Stalpers, J. A. 2001. Dictionary of the Fungi, ed. 9. CAB International, Wallingford, U.K.
16. Krog, H. 1976. Lethariella and Protousnea, two new lichen genera in Parmeliaceae. Norw. J. Bot. 23: 83-106.
17. Krog, H. 1982. Evolutionary trends in foliose and fruticose lichens of the Parmeliaceae. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 52: 303-311.
18. Lamb, I. M. 1939. A review of the genus Neuropogon (Nees & Flot.) Nyl., with special reference to the antarctic species. J. Linn. Soc. (Bot.) 52: 199-237.
19. Lamb, I. M. 1948. Further data on the genus Neuropogon. Lilloa 14: 139-168.
20. Lamb, I. M. 1964. Antarctic lichens 1. The genera Usnea, Ramalina, Himantormia, Alectoria, Cornicularia. Scient. Rep. Br. Antarct. Surv. 38: 1-34.
21. Larget, B. & Simon, D. L. 1999. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Molec. Biol. Evol. 16: 750-759.
22. Lewis, P. O. 2001. Phylogenetic systematics turns over a new leaf. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 30-37.
23. Lumbsch, H. T., Schmitt, I., Palice, Z., Wiklund, E., Ekman, S. & Wedin, M. 2004. Supraordinal phylogenetic relationships of lichen-forming discomycetes (Lecanoromycetes) based on a combined Bayesian analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial sequences. Molec. Phyl. Evol. 31: 822-832.
24. Motyka, J. 1936-1938. Lichenum Generis Usnea Studium monographicum. Pars systematica. Published by author, Lublin.
25. Nees von Esenbeck, C. G. & Flotow, V. 1835. Einige neue Flechtenarten. Linnaea 9: 495-502.
26. Ohmura, Y. 2001. Taxonomic study of the genus Usnea (lichenized Ascomycetes) in Japan and Taiwan. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 90: 1-96.
27. Ohmura, Y. 2002. Phylogenetic evaluation of infrageneric groups of the genus Usnea based on ITS regions in rDNA. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 92: 231-243.
28. Ohmura, Y. & Kanda, H. 2004. Taxonomic status of section Neuropogon in the genus Usnea elucidated by morphological comparisons and ITS rDNA sequences. Lichenologist 36: 217-225.
29. Øvstedal, D. O. & Lewis Smith, R. I. 2001. Lichens of Antarctica and South Gorgia. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
30. Page, R. D. M. 1996. Treeview: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comp. Appl. Biosci. 12: 357-358.
31. Rodríguez, F., Oliver, J. L., Marín, A. & Medina, J. R. 1990. The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. J. Theor. Biol. 142: 485-501.
32. Rogers, R. W. 1980. The Genera of Australian Lichens. Univ. Queensland Press, St. Lucia, Queensland.
33. Schmidt, H. A., Strimmer, K., Vingron, M. & von Haeseler, A. 2002. TREE-PUZZLE: maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis using quartets and parallel computing. Bioinformatics 18: 502-504.
34. Shimodaira, H. & Hasegawa, M. 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Molec. Biol. Evol. 16: 1114-1116.
35. Stevens, G. N. 1999. A revision of the lichen family Usneaceae in Australia. Bibl. Lichenol. 72: 1-128.
36. Strimmer, K. & Rambaut, A. 2002. Inferring confidence sets of possibly misspecified gene trees. Proc. Royal Soc. London Ser. Biol. Sci. 269: 137-142.
37. Swofford, D. L. 2001. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Ver. 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland Massachusetts.
38. Thell, A., Stenroos, S., Feuerer, T., Kärnefelt, I., Myllys, L. & Hyvönen, J. 2002. Phylogeny of cetrarioid lichens (Parmeliaceae) inferred from ITS and β-tubulin sequences, morphology, anatomy and secondary chemistry. Mycol. Prog. 1: 335-354.
39. Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G. & Gibson, T. J. 1994. Clustal W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple alignment through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucl. Acids Res. 22: 4673-4680.
40. Tuffley, C. & Steel, M. 1998. Modeling the covarion hypothesis of nucleotide substitution. Math. Biosci. 147: 63-91.
41. Walker, F. J. 1985. The lichen genus Usnea subgenus Neuropogon. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist., (Bot.) 13: 1-130.
42. Wedin, M. & Wiklund, E. 2004. The phylogenetic relationships of Lecanorales suborder Peltigerineae revisited. Symb. Bot. Upsal. 34: 469-475.
43. White, T. J., Bruns, T., Lee, S. & Taylor, J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. Pp. 315-322 in: Innis, M. A., Gelfand, D. H., Sninsky, J. J. & White, T. J. (eds.), PCR Protocols: a Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press, San Diego.