Supraordinal phylogenetic relationships of Lecanoromycetes based on a Bayesian analysis of combined nuclear and mitochondrial sequences

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 822-832

  Lumbsch, H Thorsten ^a,e   Schmitt, Imke ^a,e   Palice, Zdenek ^b   Wiklund, Elisabeth ^c   Ekman, Stefan ^d   Wedin, Mats ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

^b INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (Czech Republic)

^c UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^e FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGYRIACEAE; AGYRIALES; ASCOMYCOTA; CHAETOTHYRIOMYCETES; ELIXIACEAE; EUROTIOMYCETES; GRAPHIDALES; GYALECTALES; LECANORALES; LECANORINEAE; LECANOROMYCETES; OSTROPALES; PELTIGERALES; PERTUSARIALES; TELOSCHISTINEAE; UMBILICARIACEAE; UMBILICARIALES;

EID: 2442553913     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2003.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Berbee, M.L., Carmean, D.A., Winka, K., 2000. Ribosomal DNA and resolution of branching order among the Ascomycota: how many nucleotides are enough? Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 17, 337-344.
2. Bhattacharya, D., Lutzoni, F., Reeb, V., Simon, D., Nason, J., Fernandez, F., 2000. Widespread occurrence of spliceosomal introns in the rDNA genes of ascomycetes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 1971-1984.
3. Bollback, J.P., Huelsenbeck, J.P., 2001. Phylogeny, genome evolution, and host specifity of single-stranded RNA bacteriophage (family Leviviridae). J. Mol. Evol. 52, 117-128.
4. Buckley, T.R., Arensburger, P., Simon, C., Chambers, G.K., 2002. Combined data, Bayesian phylogenetics, and the origin of the New Zealand cicada genera. Syst. Biol. 51, 4-18.
5. Bull, J.J., Huelsenbeck, J.P., Cunningham, C.W., Swofford, D.L., Waddell, P.J., 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42, 384-397.
6. Carlini, D.B., Reece, K.S., Graves, J.E., 2000. Actin gene family evolution and the phylogeny of coleoid cephalopods (Mollusca: Cephalopoda). Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 540-552.
7. Chadefaud, M., 1973. Les asques et la systématique des Ascomycetes. Bull. trimest. Soc. Mycol. Fr. 99, 127-170.
8. Cubero, O.F., Crespo, A., Fathei, J., Bridge, P.D., 1999. DNA extraction and PCR amplification method suitable for fresh, herbarium-stored, lichenized and other fungi. Plant Syst. Evol. 216, 243-249.
9. Döring, H., Wedin, M., 2000. Homology assessment of the boundary tissue in fruiting bodies of the lichen family Sphaerophoraceae (Lecanorales, Ascomycota). Plant Biol. 2, 361-367.
10. Ekman, S., Wedin, M., 2000. The phylogeny of the families Lecanoraceae and Bacidiaceae (lichenized Ascomycota) inferred from nuclear SSU rDNA sequences. Plant Biol. 2, 350-360.
11. Eriksson, O.E., 1981. The families of bitunicate ascomycetes. Op. Bot. 60, 1-209.
12. Eriksson, O.E., Winka, K., 1997. Supraordinal taxa of Ascomycota. Myconet 1, 1-16.
13. Eriksson, O.E., Baral, H.-O., Currah, R.S., Hansen, K., Kurtzman, C.P., Rambold, G., Laessø, T. (Eds.), 2003. Outline of Ascomycota - 2003. Myconet 9, 1-89.
14. Felsenstein, J., 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783-791.
15. Goldman, N., Anderson, J.P., Rodrigo, A.G., 2000. Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 49, 652-670.
16. Hafellner, J., 1984. Studien in Richtung einer natürlicheren Gliederung der Sammelfamilien Lecanoraceae und Lecideaceae. Beih. Nova Hedwigia 79, 241-371.
17. Hafellner, J., 1988. Principles of classification and main taxonomic groups. In: Galun, M. (Ed.), CRC Handbook of Lichenology, vol. III. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 41-52.
18. Hafellner, J., 1994. Problems in Lecanorales systematics. In: Hawksworth, D.L. (Ed.), Ascomycete Systematics. Problems and Perspectives in the Nineties. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 315-320.
19. Hawksworth, D.L., 1987. Observations on three algicolous microfungi. Notes RBG Edinb. 44, 549-560.
20. Hawksworth, D.L., 1988. The variety of fungal-algal symbioses, their evolutionary significance, and the nature of lichens. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 96, 3-20.
21. Hawksworth, D.L. (Ed.), 1994. Ascomycete Systematics. Problems and Persepectives in the Nineties. Plenum Press, New York.
22. Hawksworth, D.L., Eriksson, O.E., 1986. The names of accepted orders of Ascomycetes. Syst Ascomycetum 5, 175-184.
23. Henssen, A., 1976. Studies in the developmental morphology of lichenised ascomycetes. In: Brown, D.H., Hawksworth, D.L., Bailey, R.H. (Eds.), Lichenology: Progress and Problems. Academic Press, London, pp. 107-138.
24. Henssen, A., 1995. Sagiolechia atlantica, eine neue Flechte von den Atlantischen Inseln (Ascomycotina, Ostropales). Bibl. Lichenol. 58, 123-136.
25. Henssen, A., Jahns, H.M., 1974. Lichenes. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart.
26. Henssen, A., Keuck, G., Renner, B., Vobis, G., 1981. The lecanoralean centrum. In: Reynolds, D.R. (Ed.), Ascomycete Systematics. The Luttrellian Concept. Springer, New York, Heidelberg, Berlin.
27. Holmgren, P.K., Holmgren, N.H., Barnett, L.C., 1990. Index Herbariorum I, eighth ed. New York.
28. Honegger, R., 1978. The ascus apex in lichenized fungi I. The Lecanora-, Peltigera-, and Teloschistes-types. Lichenologist 10, 47-67.
29. Honegger, R., 1982. Ascus structure and function, ascospore delimitation, and phycobiont cell wall types associated with the Lecanorales (lichenized ascomycetes). J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 52, 417-429.
30. Honegger, R., 1983. The ascus apex in lichenized fungi IV. Baeomyces and Icmadophila in comparison with Cladonia (Lecanorales) and the non-lichenized Leotia (Helotiales). Lichenologist 15, 57-71.
31. Honegger, R., 1996. Mycobionts. In: Nash, T.H. (Ed.), The Biology of Lichens. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 25-36.
32. Honegger, R., 1997. Metabolic interactions at the mycobiont-photobiont interface in lichens. In: Caroll, G.C., Tudzynski, P. (Eds.), The Mycota V, Part A. Plant Relationships. Springer, Berlin, pp. 209-221.
33. Huelsenbeck, J.P., Bollback, J.P., 2001. Applications of the likelihood function hi phylogenetic analysis. In: Balding, D.J., Bishop, M., Cannings, C. (Eds.), Handbook of Statistical Genetics. Wiley, Chichester, pp. 415-443.
34. Huelsenbeck, J.P., Crandall, K.A., 1997. Phylogeny estimation and hypothesis testing using maximum likelihood. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28, 437-466.
35. Huelsenbeck, J.P., Ronquist, F., 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17, 754-755.
36. Huelsenbeck, J.P., Rannala, B., Masly, J.P., 2000. Accomodating phylogenetic uncertainty in evolutionary studies. Science 288, 2349-2350.
37. Huelsenbeck, J.P., Larget, B., Miller, R.E., Ronquist, F., 2002. Potential applications and pitfalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 51, 673-688.
38. Huelsenbeck, J.P., Ronquist, F., Nielsen, R., Bollback, J.P., 2001. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294, 2310-2314.
39. Hughey, R., Krogh, A., 1996. SAM: Sequence alignment and modeling software system. Technical Report UCSC-CRL-96-22, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA.
40. Kauff, F., Lutzoni, F., 2002. Phylogeny of Gyalectales and Ostropales (Ascomycota, Fungi): among and within order relationships based on nuclear ribosomal RNA small and large subunits. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 25, 138-156.
41. Kirk, P.M., Cannon, J.C., David, J.C., Stalpers, J.A., 2001. Ainsworth & Bisby's Dictionary of the Fungi, ninth ed. CAB International, Egham.
42. Kranner, I., Lutzoni, F., 1999. Evolutionary consequence of transition to a lichen symbiotic state and physiological adaptation to oxidative damage with poikilohydry. In: Lerner, H.R. (Ed.), Plant Responses to Environmental Stresses: From Phytohormones to Genome Reorganization. Dekker, New York, pp. 591-628.
43. Kreisel, H., 1969. Grundzüge eines natürlichen Systems der Pilze. Verlag von J. Cramer, Lehre.
44. Larget, B., Simon, D.L., 1999. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 750-759.
45. Leaché, A.D., Reeder, T.W., 2002. Molecular systematics of the eastern fence lizard (Sceleporus undulatus): a comparison of parsimony, likelihood and Bayesian approaches. Syst. Biol. 51, 44-68.
46. Lewis, P.O., 2001. Phylogenetic systematics turns over a new leaf. TREE 16, 30-37.
47. Lindemuth, R., Wirtz, N., Lumbsch, H.T., 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial sequence data supports that loculoascomycetes (Ascomycota) are not monophyletic. Mycol. Res. 105, 1176-1181.
48. Lumbsch, H.T., 1997. Systematic studies in the suborder Agyriineae (Lecanorales). J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 83, 1-73.
49. Lumbsch, H.T., 1998. Taxonomic use of metabolic data in lichen-forming fungi. In: Frisvad, J.C., Bridge, P.D., Arora, D.K. (Eds.), Chemical Fungal Taxonomy. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 345-387.
50. Lumbsch, H.T., Schmitt, L, 2001. Molecular data suggest that the lichen genus Pertusaria is not monophyletic. Lichenologist 33, 161-170.
51. Lumbsch, H.T., Guderley, R., Feige, G.B., 1997. Ascospore septation in Diploschistes and the taxonomic significance of macro- and microcephalic spore types. Plant Syst. Evol. 205, 179-184.
52. Lumbsch, H.T., Lindemuth, R., Schmitt, I., 2000. Evolution of filamentous ascomycetes inferred from LSU rDNA data. Plant Biol. 2, 525-529.
53. Lumbsch, H.T., Lunke, T., Feige, G.B., Huneck, S., 1995. Anamylopsoraceae - a new family of lichenized ascomycetes with stipitate apothecia (Lecanorales: Agyriineae). Plant Syst. Evol. 198, 275-286.
54. Lumbsch, H.T., Schmitt, I., Döring, H., Wedin, M., 2001a. Molecular systematics supports the recognition of an additional order of Ascomycota: the Agyriales. Mycol. Res. 105, 16-23.
55. Lumbsch, H.T., Schmitt, I., Döring, H., Wedin, M., 2001b. ITS sequence data suggest variability of ascus types and support ontogenetic characters as phylogenetic discriminators in the Agyriales (Ascomycota). Mycol. Res. 105, 265-274.
56. Lumbsch, H.T., Wirtz, N., Lindemuth, R., Schmitt, I., 2002. Higher level phylogenetic relationships of euascomycetes (Pezizomycotina) inferred from a combined analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial sequence data. Mycol. Progress 1, 57-70.
57. Lutzoni, F., Pagel, M., Reeb, V., 2001. Major fungal lineages are derived from lichen symbiotic ancestors. Nature 411, 937-940.
58. Magne, F., 1946. Anatomie et morphologie comparées des asques de quelques lichens. Rev. Bryol. Lichén. 15, 203-209.
59. Nannfeldt, J.A., 1932. Studien über die Morphologie und Systematik der nicht-lichenisierten inoperculaten Discomyceten. Nova Acta Reg. Soc.Sci. Upsal., ser. IV 8 (2), 1-368.
60. Ott, S., Lumbsch, H.T., 2001. Morphology and phylogeny of ascomycete lichens. In: Esser, K. (Ed.), The Mycota. Springer, Berlin, pp. 189-210.
61. Page, R.D.M., 1996. Treeview: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comp. Appl. Biosci. 12, 357-358.
62. Platt, J.L., Spatafora, J.W., 2000. Evolutionary relationships of nonsexual lichenized fungi: molecular phylogenetic hypotheses for the genera Siphula and Thamnolia from SSU and LSU rDNA. Mycologia 92, 475-487.
63. Poelt, J., 1973. Classification. In: Ahmadjian, V., Hale, M.E. (Eds.), The Lichens. Academic Press, New York, pp. 599-632.
64. Posada, D., Crandall, K.A., 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14, 817-818.
65. Rannala, B., Yang, Z., 1996. Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: a new method of phylogenetic inference. J. Mol. Evol. 43, 304-311.
66. Rodriguez, F., Oliver, J.F., Martín, A., Medina, J.R., 1990. The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. J. Theor. Biol. 142, 485-501.
67. Sherwood, MA., 1977. The Ostropalean fungi. Mycotaxon 5, 1-277.
68. Stenroos, S.K., DePriest, P.T., 1998. SSU rDNA phylogeny of cladoniiform lichens. Am. J. Bot. 85, 1548-1559.
69. Swofford, D.L., 1998. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
70. Tehler, A., Farris, J.S., Lipscomb, D.L., Källersjö, M., 2000. Phylogenetic analyses of the fungi based on large rDNA data sets. Mycologia 92, 459-474.
71. Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., Gibson, T.J., 1994. Clustal W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673-4680.
72. Wedin, M., 1990. Ascocarp and spore ontogeny in two species of Sphaerophorus. Nord. J. Bot. 10, 539-545.
73. Wedin, M., 1993. A phylogenetic analysis of the lichen family Sphaerophoraceae (Caliciales); a new generic classification and notes on character evolution. Plant Syst. Evol. 187, 213-241.
74. Wedin, M., Tibell, L., 1997. Phylogeny and evolution of Caliciaceae, Mycocaliciaceae, and Sphinctrinaceae (Ascomycota), with notes on the evolution of the prototunicate ascus. Can. J. Bot. 75, 1236-1242.
75. Wedin, M., Baloch, E., Grube, M., 2002. Parsimony analyses of mt SSU and nITS sequences reveal the natural relationships of the lichen families Physciaceae and Caliciaceae (Lecanorales, Ascomycota). Taxon 51, 655-660.
76. Wedin, M., Tehler, A., Gargas, A., 1998. Phylogenetic relationships of Sphaerophoraceae (Ascomycetes) inferred from SSU rDNA sequences. Plant Syst. Evol. 209, 75-83.
77. Wedin, M., Döring, H., Nordin, A., Tibell, L., 2000. Small subunit rDNA phylogeny shows the lichen families Caliciaceae and Physciaceae (Lecanorales, Ascomycotina) form a monophyletic group. Can. J. Bot. 78, 246-254.
78. Wiklund, E., Wedin, M., 2003. The phylogenetic relationships of cyanobacterial lichens-Lecanorales suborder Peltigerineae. Cladistics 19, 419-431.
79. Winka, K., 2000. Phylogenetic relationships within the Ascomycota based on 18S rDNA sequences. Ph.D. thesis, Umeå University, Umeå.
80. Winka, K., Ahlberg, C., Eriksson, O.E., 1998. Are there lichenized Ostropales? Lichenologist 30, 455-462.