The effects of student verbal and nonverbal responsiveness on teachers' liking of students and willingness to comply with student requests

International Journal of Phytoremediation

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 27-38

  Mottet, Timothy P ^a   Beebe, Steven A ^a   Raffeld, Paul C ^a   Paulsel, Michelle L ^b  

^a TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Liking; Nonverbal responsiveness; Student communication effectiveness; Teacher compliance; Verbal responsiveness

Indexed keywords

EID: 85064801122     PISSN: 15226514     EISSN: 15497879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01463370409370176     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Baringer, D., and McCroskey, J. C., 2000. Immediacy in the classroom: Student immediacy. Communication Education, 49: 178–186.
2. Berelson, B., 1952. Content analysis in communication research, New York: Free Press.
3. Burgoon, J. K., 1994. “ Nonverbal signals ”. In Handbook of interpersonal communication, Edited by: Knapp, M. L., and Miller, G. R., 229–285. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Byrne, D., 1971. The attraction paradigm, New York: Academic Press.
5. Chesebro, J. L., and McCroskey, J. C., 2001. Communication for teachers, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
6. Comstock, J., 1999. Mutual influence in teacher-student relationships: Applying IAT to access teacher adaptation to student classroom involvement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association. November1999, Chicago, IL.
7. French, J. R. P., Jr. and Raven, B. H., 1959. “ The bases of social power ”. In Studies in social power, Edited by: Cartwright, D., 150–167. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
8. Frymier, A. B., 1994. The use of affinity-seeking in producing liking and learning in the classroom. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22: 87–105.
9. Frymier, A. B., and Houser, M. L., 2000. The teacher-student relationship as an interpersonal relationship. Communication Education, 49: 207–219.
10. Frymier, A. B., and Thompson, C. A., 1992. Perceived teacher affinity-seeking in relation to perceived teacher credibility. Communication Education, 41: 388–399.
11. Golish, T. D., and Olson, L. N., 2000. Students’ use of power in the classroom: An investigation of student power, teacher power, and teacher immediacy. Communication Quarterly, 48: 293–310.
12. Kearney, P., and Plax, T. G., 1992. “ Student resistance to control ”. In Power in the classroom: Communication, control, and concern, Edited by: Richmond, V. P., and McCroskey, J. C., 85–100. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Kelman, H. C., 1974. “ Further thoughts on the processes of compliance, identification, and internalization ”. In Perspectives on social power, Edited by: Tedeschi, J. T., 125–171. Chicago: Aldine.
14. Levine, T. R., and Hullett, C. R., 2002. Eta squared, partial eta squared, and misreporting of effect size in communication research. Human Communication Research, 28: 612–625.
15. Martin, M. M, Myers, S. A., and Mottet, T. P., 2002. “ Students’ motives for communicating with their instructors ”. In Communication for teachers, Edited by: Chesebro, J. L., and McCroskey, J. C., 35–46. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
16. McCroskey, J. C., and McCroskey, L. L., 1986. The affinity-seeking of classroom teachers. Communication Research Reports, 3: 158–167.
17. McCroskey, J. C., and Richmond, V. P., 1992. “ Increasing teacher influence through immediacy ”. In Power in the classroom: Communication, control, and concern, Edited by: Richmond, V. P., and McCroskey, J. C., 101–119. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Mehrabian, A., 1971. Silent messages, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
19. Mottet, T. P., 2000. Interactive television instructors’ perceptions of students’ nonverbal responsiveness and their influence on distance teaching. Communication Education, 49: 146–164.
20. Mottet, T. P., Beebe, S. A., Raffeld, P. C, and Medlock, A. L., in press. The effects of student verbal and nonverbal classroom communication behaviors on teachers’ perceptions of self-efficacy and job satisfaction. Communication Education.
21. Myers, S. A., 1995. Student perceptions of teacher affinity-seeking and classroom climate. Communication Research Reports, 12: 192–199.
22. Nussbaum, J. F., 1992. Effective teaching behaviors. Communication Education, 41: 167–180.
23. Plax, T. G., and Kearney, P., 1992. “ Teacher power in the classroom: Defining and advancing a program of research ”. In Power in the classroom: Communication, control, and concern, Edited by: Richmond, V. P., and McCroskey, J. C., 67–84. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Richmond, V. P., 1990. Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication Education, 39: 181–195.
25. Richmond, V. P., and McCroskey, J. C., 1992. Power in the classroom: Communication, control, and concern, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26. Richmond, V. P., and McCroskey, J. C., 1995. Communication: Apprehension, Avoidance, and Effectiveness, Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
27. Waldeck, J. H., Kearney, P., and Plax, T. G., 2001. “ Instructional and developmental communication theory and research in the 1990s: Extending the agenda for the 21st century ”. In Communication yearbook, Edited by: Gudykunst, W. B., Vol. 24, 206–229. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
28. Wanzer, M. B., 1998. An exploratory investigation of student and teacher perceptions of student-generated affinity-seeking behaviors. Communication Education, 47: 371–382.
29. Watzlawick, P., Bavelas, J. B., and Jackson, D. D., 1967. Pragmatics of human communication, New York: W.W. Norton & Company.