Students’ perceptions of instructors’ socio-communicative style and the influence on instructor credibility and situational motivation

International Journal of Phytoremediation

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 431-440

  Martin, Matthew M ^a   Chesebro, Joseph L ^a   Mottet, Timothy P ^a  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85064787441     PISSN: 15226514     EISSN: 15497879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08824099709388686     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Anderson, C. M., and Martin, M. M., 1995. Communication motives of assertive and responsive communicators. Communication Research Reports, 12: 186-191.
2. Beatty, M. J., Forst, E. C., and Stewart, R. A., 1986. Communication apprehension and motivation as predictors of public speaking duration. Communication Education, 35: 143-146.
3. Booth-Butterfield, M., 1992. Interpersonal communication in instructional settings, Edina, MN: Burgess International.
4. Brophy, J., 1987a. “ On motivating students ”. In Talks to teachers, Edited by: Berliner, D., and Rosenshine, B., 201-245. New York: Random House.
5. Brophy, J., 1987b. Synthesis of research on strategies for motivating students to learn. Educational Leadership, 45: 40-48.
6. Brophy, J., 1983. Conceptualizing student motivation. Education Psychologist, 18: 200-215.
7. Christophel, D. M., 1990. The relationship among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 37: 323-340.
8. Christophel, D. M., and Gorham, J., 1995. A test-retest analysis of student motivation, teacher immediacy, and perceived sources of motivation and demotivation in college classes. Communication Education, 44: 292-306.
9. Cusella, L. P., 1982. The effects of source expertise and feedback valence on intrinsic motivation. Human Communication Research, 9: 17-32.
10. Feather, N. T., 1982. Expectations and actions, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Frymier, A. B., 1994. A model of immediacy in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 42: 133-144.
12. Frymier, A. B., 1993. The impact of teacher immediacy on students’ motivation: Is it the same for all students?. Communication Quarterly, 41: 454-464.
13. Frymier, A. B., and Shulman, G. M., 1995. “What's in it for mer’ Increasing content relevance to enhance students’ motivation. Communication Education, 44: 40-50.
14. Frymier, A. B., and Thompson, C. A., 1992. Perceived teacher affinity-seeking in relation to perceived teacher credibility. Communication Education, 41: 388-399.
15. Gorham, J., and Christophel, D. M., 1992. Students’ perceptions of teacher behaviors as motivations and demotivating factors in college classes. Communication Quarterly, 40: 239-252.
16. Koehn, S. C., and Crowell, T., The development of a perceived caring scale for educators and students. Paper presented at the convention of the Speech Communication Association. San Diego, CA. November.
17. Lamke, L. K., Sollie, D. L., Durbin, R. G., and Fitzpatrick, J. A., 1994. Masculinity, femininity and relational satisfaction: The mediating role of interpersonal competence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11: 535-554.
18. Martin, M. M., and Anderson, C. M., 1996. Argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11: 547-554.
19. Martin, M. M., Anderson, C. M., and Sirimangkala, P., 1996. The relationship between use of organizational conflict strategies with socio-communicative style and aggressive communication traits. Manuscript submitted for publication
20. Martin, M. M., Weber, K., and Burant, P. A., Students’ perceptions of a teacher's use of slang and verbal aggressiveness in a lecture: An experiment. Paper presented at the Eastern Communication Association Convention. Baltimore. April.
21. McCroskey, J. C., 1992. An introduction to communication in the classroom, Edina, MN: Burgess International.
22. McCroskey, J. C., "Sort of a critique”; of Janis F. Andersen: Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. Paper presented at the annual convention of the International Communication Association. San Francisco. May.
23. McCroskey, J. C., Hamilton, P. R., and Weiner, A. M., 1974. The effect of interaction behavior on source credibility, homophily, and interpersonal attraction. Human Communication Research, 1: 42-52.
24. McCroskey, J. C., and Richmond, V. P., 1996. Fundamentals of human communication: An interpersonal perspective, Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
25. Myers, S. A., 1997. Student perceptions of teacher socio-communicative style, argumentativeness, and verbal aggressiveness. Manuscript submitted for publication
26. Myers, S. A., and Avtgis, T., in press. The impact of socio-communicative style and relational context on perceptions of nonverbal immediacy. Communication Research Reports.
27. Patterson, B. R., and Beckett, C. S., 1995. A re-examination of relational repair and reconciliation: Impact of socio-communicative style on strategy selection. Communication Research Reports, 12: 235-240.
28. Pintrich, P. R., and DeGroot, E. V., 1990. Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Education Psychology, 82: 33-40.
29. Richmond, V. P., 1990. Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication Education, 39: 181-195.
30. Richmond, V. P., and Martin, M. M., “ Socio-communicative style ”. In Communication and personality: Trait perspectives, Edited by: McCroskey, J. C., Daly, J. A., Martin, M. M., and Beatty, M. J., Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. (in press).
31. Richmond, V. P., and McCroskey, J. C., 1992. Organizational communication for survival, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
32. Richmond, V. P., and McCroskey, J. C., 1990. Reliability and separation of factors on the assertiveness-responsiveness measure. Psychological Reports, 67: 449-450.
33. Rodriguez, J. I., Plax, T. G., and Kearney, P., 1996. Clarifying the relationship between teacher nonverbal immediacy and student cognitive learning: Affective learning as the central causal mediator. Communication Education, 45: 293-305.
34. Rubin, R. B., and Martin, M. M., 1994. Development of a measure of interpersonal communication competence. Communication Research Reports, 11: 33-44.
35. Schiefele, U., 1991. Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26: 299-322.
36. Sidelinger, R. J., and McCroskey, J. C., 1997. Communication correlates of teacher clarity in the college classroom. Communication Research Reports, 14: 1-10.
37. Teven, J. J., and McCroskey, J. C., 1997. The relationship of perceived teacher caring with student learning and teacher evaluation. Communication Education, 46
38. Thomas, C. E., A theoretical model of the relationship between teacher personality variables, classroom communication, and student outcomes. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication Association. San Antonio, TX. November.
39. Thomas, C. E., Richmond, V. P., and McCroskey, J. C., 1994. The association between immediacy and socio-communicative style. Communication Research Reports, 11: 107-115.
40. Wheeless, V.E., and Dierks-Stewart, K., 1981. The psychometric properties of the Bern Sex-Role Inventory: Questions concerning reliability and validity. Communication Quarterly, 29: 173-186.
41. Wheeless, V.E., and Lashbrook, W.B., 1987. “ Style ”. In Personality and interpersonal communication, Edited by: McCroskey, J. C., and Daly, J. A., 243-276. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
42. Wlodkowski, R. J., 1978. Motivation and teaching: A practical guide, Washington, DC: National Education Association.
43. Wooten, A. G., and McCroskey, J. C., 1996. Student trust of teacher as a function of socio-communicative style of teacher and socio-communicative orientation of student. Communication Research Reports, 13: 94-100.