Cultural competence in evaluation: An overview

New Directions for Evaluation

Volumn 2004, Issue 102, 2004, Pages 5-19

  SenGupta, Saumitra ^a   Hopson, Rodney ^b   Thompson Robinson, Melva ^c  

^a Behavioral Health Research Center of the Southwest   (United States)

^b DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c FLORIDA A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33744908702     PISSN: 10976736     EISSN: 1534875X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ev.112     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. American Evaluation Association. “Proposal for the Initiative for Building Diversity Among the Evaluation Community, Phase 1.” Magnolia, Ark.: American Evaluation Association, 2000.
2. American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.(4th ed.)Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association, 1994.
3. American Psychological Association.Guidelines for Providers of Psychological Services to Ethnic, Linguistic, and Culturally Diverse Populations.Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1990.
4. American Psychological Association.“Guidelines on Multicultural Education, Training, Research, Practice, and Organizational Change for Psychologists.“American Psychologist, 2003, 58(5), 377-402.
5. Arredondo, P., and Hood, S., “RACE 2004-Relevance of Assessment and Culture in Evaluation, " 2004.[http://coe.asu.edu/race/about.html].
6. Bamberger, M., “Ethical Issues in Conducting Evaluation in International Settings.“In J. L.Fitzpatrick and M.Morris (eds.), Current and Emerging Ethical Challenges in Evaluation.New Directions for Evaluation, no. 82.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1999.
7. Coffman, J., “Michael Scriven on the Differences Between Evaluation and Social Science Research.“Harvard Family Research Project-Evaluation Exchange, 2004, 9(4), 7.
8. Conner, R. F., “International and Domestic Evaluation: Comparisons and Insights.“In M. Q.Patton (ed.), Culture and Evaluation.New Directions for Program Evaluation, no. 25.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1985.
9. Council of National Psychological Associations for the Advancement of Ethnic Minority Interests (CNPAAEMI).Guidelines for Research in Ethnic Minority Communities.Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 2000.
10. Cross, T. L., Bazron, B. J., Dennis, K. W., and Isaacs, M. R., Towards a Culturally Competent System of Care.Washington, D.C.: CAASP Technical Assistance Center, Georgetown University Childcare Center, 1989.
11. Fiske, A. P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., and Nisbett, R. E., “The Cultural Matrix of Social Psychology.“In D. T.Gilbert and S. T.Fiske (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology.(4th ed.)New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998.
12. Frierson, H., Hood, S., and Hughes, G., “Strategies That Address Culturally Responsive Evaluation.“In J.Frechtling (ed.), The 2002 User-Friendly Handbook for Project Evaluation.Arlington, Va.: National Science Foundation, 2002.
13. Ginsberg, P. E., “Evaluation in Cross-Cultural Perspective.“Evaluation and Program Planning, 1988, 1(2), 189-195.
14. Goode, T. D., and Jones, W., “Conceptual Frameworks/Models, Guiding Values and Principles.” National Center for Cultural Competence, 2003.[http://gucchd.georgetown.edu/nccc/framework.html].
15. Greene, J. C., “Challenges in Practicing Deliberative Democratic Evaluation.“In K. E.Ryan and L.DeStefano (eds.), Evaluation as a Democratic Process: Promoting Inclusion, Dialogue, and Deliberation.New Directions for Evaluation, no. 85.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2000.
16. Hage, J., Techniques and Problems of Theory Construction in Sociology.New York: Wiley, 1972.
17. Hood, S., “Nobody Knows My Name: In Praise of African American Evaluators Who Were Responsive.“In J. C.Greene and T. A.Abma (eds.), Responsive Evaluation.New Directions for Evaluation, no. 92.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001.
18. Hopson, R. K., “Minority Issues in Evaluation Revisited: Re-conceptualizing and Creating Institutional Change.“American Journal of Evaluation, 1999, 20(3), 445-451.
19. Hopson, R. K., Overview of Multicultural and Culturally Competent Program Evaluation: Issues, Challenges and Opportunities.Woodland Hills, Calif.: California Endowment, 2004.
20. Hopson, R. K., Lucas, K. J., and Peterson, J. A., “HIV/AIDS Talk: Implications for Prevention Intervention and Evaluation.“In R. K.Hopson (ed.), How and Why Language Matters in Evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, no. 86. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2000.
21. House, E. R., “How We Think About Evaluation.“In E. R.House (ed.), Philosophy of Evaluation.New Directions for Program Evaluation, no. 19.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1983.
22. House, E. R., Professional Evaluation: Social Impact and Consequences.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1993.
23. House, E. R., “Race and Policy.“Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 1999, 7(16).[http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v7n16.html].
24. House, E. R., and Howe, K. R., “Deliberative Democratic Evaluation.“In K. E.Ryan and L.DeStefano (eds.), Evaluation as a Democratic Process: Promoting Inclusion, Dialogue, and Deliberation.New Directions for Evaluation, no. 85.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2000.
25. Joh, T., Endo, T., and Yu, H. C., Voices from the Field: Health and Evaluation Leaders on Multicultural Evaluation.Woodland Hills, Calif.: California Endowment Foundation, 2003.
26. Kagawa-Singer, M., and others.Multicultural Health Evaluation: Literature Review and Critique.Los Angeles: UCLA School of Public Health, 2003.
27. Kaplan, A., The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Science.Scranton, Penn.: Chandler, 1964.
28. Kirkhart, K. E., “Seeking Multicultural Validity: A Postcard from the Road.“Evaluation Practice, 1995, 16(1), 1-12.
29. Lee, E., “Overview: The Assessment and Treatment of Asian American Families.“In E.Lee (ed.), Working with Asian Americans: A Guide for Clinicians. New York: Guilford Press, 1997.
30. Linde, P. R., Of Spirits and Madness-An American Psychiatrist in Africa.New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001.
31. Madison, A. M., “Primary Inclusion of Culturally Diverse Minority Program Participants in the Evaluation Process.“In A. M.Madison (ed.), Minority Issues in Evaluation.New Directions for Program Evaluation, no. 53.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1992.
32. Madison, A. M., “Language in Defining Social Problems and in Evaluating Social Programs.“In R. K.Hopson (ed.), How and Why Language Matters in Evaluation.New Directions for Evaluation, no. 86.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2000.
33. Merryfield, M. M., “The Challenge of Cross-Cultural Evaluation: Some Views from the Field.“In M. Q.Patton (ed.), Culture and Evaluation.New Directions for Program Evaluation, no. 25.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1985.
34. Mertens, D. M., “Inclusive Evaluation: Implications of Transformative Theory for Evaluation.“American Journal of Evaluation, 1999, 20(1), 1-14.
35. Parham, T. A., “Counseling African Americans: The Current State of Affairs.“In T. A.Parham (ed.), Counseling Persons of African Descent: Raising the Bar of Practitioner Competence.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 2002.
36. Parham, T. A., andParham W. D. “Understanding African American Mental Health: The Necessity of New Conceptual Paradigms.“In T. A.Parham (ed.), Counseling Persons of African Descent: Raising the Bar of Practitioner Competence.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 2002.
37. Patton, M. Q., “Cross-Cultural Nongeneralizations.“In M. Q.Patton (ed.), Culture and Evaluation.New Directions for Program Evaluation, no. 25.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1985.
38. Patton, M. Q., “Overview: Language Matters.“In R. K.Hopson (ed.), How and Why Language Matters in Evaluation.New Directions for Evaluation, no. 86.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2000.
39. Pettigrew, T. G., “The Ultimate Attributional Error: Extending Allport’s Cognitive Analysis of Prejudice.“Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1979, 5, 461-476.
40. Ryan, K. E., and DeStefano, L., “Disentangling Dialog: Issues from Practice.“In K. E.Ryan and L.DeStefano (eds.), Evaluation as a Democratic Process: Promoting Inclusion, Dialogue, and Deliberation.New Directions for Evaluation, no. 85.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2000.
41. Scriven, M., Evaluation Thesaurus.(4th ed.)Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1991.
42. Stake, R. E., “Program Evaluation, Particularly Responsive Evaluation.” Kalamazoo, Mich.: Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University, 1975.
43. Stufflebeam, D. L., “The CIPP Model for Evaluation.“In T.Kellaghan and D. L.Stufflebeam (eds.), The International Handbook of Educational Evaluation. Norwell, Mass.: Kluwer, 2003.
44. Suzuki, L. A., and Valencia, R. R., “Race-Ethnicity and Measured Intelligence: Educational Implications.“American Psychologist, 1997, 52(10), 1103-1114.
45. Thomas, L., Rogers, S. J., and Fraser, E., “Building Evaluation Capacity in the Mid-South Delta.“Paper presented at the American Evaluation Association Annual Conference, Honolulu, Nov. 2000.
46. U.S. Department of Education. “Scientifically Based Evaluation Methods.” Federal Register, RIN 1890-ZA00, 2003.
47. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS).Mental Health: Culture, Race, and Ethnicity-A Supplement to Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General.Rockville, Md.: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Mental Health Services, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2001.
48. Wadsworth, Y., “Becoming Responsive-and Some Consequences for Evaluation as Dialogue Across Distance.“In J. C.Greene and T. A.Abma (eds.), Responsive Evaluation.New Directions for Evaluation, no. 92.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001.
49. Wilson, W. J., The Truly Disadvantaged.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.