Challenges in practicing deliberative democratic evaluation

New Directions for Evaluation

Volumn 2000, Issue 85, 2000, Pages 13-26

  Greene, Jennifer C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84995512738     PISSN: 10976736     EISSN: 1534875X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ev.1158     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Barber, B., Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age.Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.
2. Benjamin, L., “A-Exam.“Unpublished manuscript, Department of Policy Analysis and Management, Cornell University, 1998.
3. Burbules, N. C. and Rice, S., “Dialogue Across Differences: Continuing the Conversation.“Harvard Educational Review, 1991, 61, 393-416.
4. Cook, T. D., “Postpositivist Critical Multiplism.“In R. L.Shotlandand M. M.Mark (eds.), Social Science and Social Policy.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1985.
5. Cousins, J. B., and Earl, L., Participatory Evaluation in Education: Studies in Evaluation Use and Organizational Learning.Bristol, Pa.: Falmer Press, 1995.
6. Cousins, J. B., and Whitmore, E., “Framing Participatory Evaluation.“In E. Whitmore., (ed.), Understanding and Practicing Participatory Evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, no. 80. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1998.
7. Fetterman, D. M., “Empowerment Evaluation.“Evaluation Practice, 1994, 15, 1-16.
8. Fine, M., “Working the Hyphens: Reinventing Self and Other in Qualitative Research.“In N.Denzinand Y.Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1994.
9. Greene, J. C., “Evaluation as Advocacy.“Evaluation Practice, 1997, 18, 25-36.
10. Harding, S., Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives.Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1991.
11. Mark, M. M., and Shotland, R. L., “Stakeholder-Based Evaluation and Value Judgments.“Evaluation Review, 1985, 9, 605-626.
12. Mathison, S., “Evaluation as a Democratizing Force in Schools.“International Journal of Social Education, 1996, 11, 40-48.
13. Mertens, D., “Presidential Address. Inclusive Evaluation: Implications of Transformative Theory for Evaluation.“American Journal of Evaluation, 1999, 20, 1-14.
14. Patton, M. Q., (1998).Utilization-Focused Evaluation.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1998.
15. Preskill, H., and Torres, R. T., (1998).Evaluative Inquiry for Learning in Organizations.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1998.
16. Ryan, K. E., Greene, J., Lincoln, Y., Mathison, S., and Mertens, D., “Advantages and Challenges of Using Inclusive Evaluation Approaches in Evaluation Practice.“American Journal of Evaluation, 1998, 19, 101-122.
17. Vander Plaat, M., “Beyond Technique.“Evaluation, 1995, 1, 81-96.