Disentangling dialogue: Issues from practice

New Directions for Evaluation

Volumn 2000, Issue 85, 2000, Pages 63-76

  Ryan, Katherine E ^a   DeStefano, Lizanne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84996159568     PISSN: 10976736     EISSN: 1534875X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ev.1162     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Abma, T. A., “Text in the Evaluative Context: Writing for Dialogue.“Evaluation, 1998, 4, 434-454.
2. Abma, T. A., “The Schiphol Discussion: The Future of Dutch Aviation Responsively Evaluated.“Presentation at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Orlando, Fla., Nov. 1999.
3. Bakhtin, M. M., Speech Genres and Other Late Essays.Austin, 1986.
4. Bresler, L., De Stefano, L., Feldman, R., and Garg, S., “Artists-in-Residence in Public Schools.“Unpublished manuscript, 1999.
5. Burbules, N., Dialogue in Teaching.New York: Teachers College Press, 1993.
6. Gadamer, H.-G., Truth and Method.New York: Crossroad, 1982.
7. Greene, J. C., “Participatory Evaluation.“In L.Mabry (ed.), Evaluation and the Post-Modern Dilemma.Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 1997.
8. House, E. R., and Howe, K. R., “The Deliberative Democratic View.“Presentation at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Chicago, Nov. 1998.
9. House, E. R., and Howe, K. R., Values in Evaluation and Social Research.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1999.
10. Karlsson, O., “A Critical Dialogue in Evaluation: How Can the Interaction Between Evaluation and Politics Be Tackled?“Evaluation, 1996, 2, 405-416.
11. Karlsson, O., “Socratic Dialogue in the Swedish Political Context.“In T. A. Schwandt., (ed.), Scandinavian Perspectives on the Evaluator’s Role in Informing Social Policy. New Directions for Evaluation, no. 77. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1998.
12. Mathison, S., “Evaluation as a Democratizing Force in Schools.“International Journal of Social Education, 1996, 11, 40-48.
13. Preskill, H., and Torres, R., Evaluative Inquiry for Learning in Organizations.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1999.
14. Schwandt, T. A., “Evaluation as Practical Hermeneutics.“Evaluation, 1997, 3, 69-83.
15. Schwandt, T. A., “Dialogue in Evaluation: Philosophy, Theory, and Practice.“Presentation at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Orlando, Fla., Nov. 1999.
16. Strauss, A., and Corbin, J., Basics of Qualitative Research.(2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1998.