Ethical issues in conducting evaluation in international settings

New Directions for Evaluation

Volumn 1999, Issue 82, 1999, Pages 89-97

  Bamberger, Michael ^a  

^a WORLD BANK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013752898     PISSN: 10976736     EISSN: 1534875X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ev.1140     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Bamberger, M., and Lebo, J., “Gender and Transport: A Rationale for Action." PREM Notes, no. 14. Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Department.Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, 1999.
2. Barwell, I., Transport and the Village.World Bank Discussion Paper No. 344, Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1996.
3. “CDC Overseas Research Doesn’t Include Ethics Agreement.“Cleveland Plain Dealer, Nov. 9, 1998.
4. Gill, C., “Invisible Ubiquity: The Surprising Relevance of Disability Issues in Evaluation.“Paper presented at the American Evaluation Association Conference, Chicago, Nov. 5, 1998.
5. Hendricks, M., and Connor, R., “International Perspectives on the Guiding Principles.“In W. R. Shadish., D. Newman., M. A. Scheirer., and C. Wye., (eds.), Guiding Principles for Evaluation.New Directions for Program Evaluation, no. 66. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1995.
6. Mertens, D., “Identifying and Respecting Differences Among Participants in Evaluation Studies.“In W. Shadish., D. Newman., M. A. Scheirer., and C. Wye., (eds.), Guiding Principles for Evaluation.New Directions for Program Evaluation, no. 66. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1995.
7. Pollard, D. S., “Towards a Pluralistic Perspective on Equity.“Women’s Education Equity Act Publishing Center Digest, 1992, 7, 1-2.