Krox20 hindbrain cis-regulatory landscape: Interplay between multiple long-range initiation and autoregulatory elements

Development

Volumn 133, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 1253-1262

  Chomette, Diane ^a   Frain, Monique ^a   Cereghini, Silvia ^b   Charnay, Patrick ^a   Ghislain, Julien ^a  

^a ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

^b SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Chick; Hindbrain segmentation; Mouse; Pattern formation; Transcriptional enhancers; vHnf1

Indexed keywords

EARLY GROWTH RESPONSE FACTOR 2; HEPATOCYTE NUCLEAR FACTOR 1BETA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZINC FINGER PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; CONSERVATION GENETICS; DOWNSTREAM PROCESSING; EMBRYO; EMBRYO PATTERN FORMATION; EMBRYO SEGMENTATION; ENHANCER REGION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; MOUSE; MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NEURAL CREST; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; RHOMBENCEPHALON; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; BINDING SITES; BODY PATTERNING; CHICK EMBRYO; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; EARLY GROWTH RESPONSE PROTEIN 2; ENHANCER ELEMENTS (GENETICS); GALACTOSIDES; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENES, REPORTER; GENOME, HUMAN; HEPATOCYTE NUCLEAR FACTOR 1-BETA; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; INDOLES; LAC OPERON; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, INBRED DBA; MICE, TRANSGENIC; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MUTAGENESIS, SITE-DIRECTED; PROMOTER REGIONS (GENETICS); PROTEIN BINDING; RHOMBENCEPHALON; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, NUCLEIC ACID; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION SITE;

VERTEBRATA;

EID: 33646145319     PISSN: 09501991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1242/dev.02289     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Amoyel, M., Cheng, Y. C., Jiang, Y. J. and Wilkinson, D. G. (2005). Wnt1 regulates neurogenesis and mediates lateral inhibition of boundary cell specification in the zebrafish hindbrain. Development 132, 775-785.
2. Andrioli, L. R, Vasisht, V., Theoclosopoulou, E., Oberstein, A. and Small, S. (2002). Anterior repression of a Drosophila stripe enhancer requires three position-specific mechanisms. Development 129, 4931-4940.
3. Barbacci, E., Chalkiadaki, A., Masdeu, C., Haumaitre, C., Lokmane, L., Loirat, C., Cloarec, S., Talianidis, I., Bellanne-Chantelot, C. and Cereghini, S. (2004). HNF1beta/TCF2 mutations impair transactivation potential through altered co-regulator recruitment. Hum. Mol. Genet. 13, 3139-3149.
4. Barrow, J. R., Stadler, H. S. and Capecchi, M. R. (2000). Roles of Hoxa1 and Hoxa2 in patterning the early hindbrain of the mouse. Development 127, 933-944.
5. Bell, E., Wingate, R. J. and Lumsden, A. (1999). Homeotic transformation of rhombomere identity after localized Hoxb1 misexpression. Science 284, 2168-2171.
6. Birgbauer, E. and Fraser, S. E. (1994). Violation of cell lineage restriction compartments in the chick hindbrain. Development 120, 1347-1356.
7. Birgbauer, E., Sechrist, J., Bronner-Fraser, M. and Fraser, S. (1995). Rhombomeric origin and rostrocaudal reassortment of neural crest cells revealed by intravital microscopy Development 121, 935-945.
8. Carpenter, E. M., Goddard, J. M., Chisaka, O., Manley, N. R. and Capecchi, M. R. (1993). Loss of Hox-A1 (Hox-1.6) function results in the reorganization of the murine hindbrain. Development 118, 1063-1075.
9. Cereghini, S., Blumenfeld, M. and Yaniv, M. (1988). A liver-specific factor essential for albumin transcription differs between differentiated and dedifferentiated rat hepatoma cells. Genes Dev. 8, 957-974.
10. Cereghini, S., Ott, M-O., Power, S. and Maury, M. (1992). Expression patterns of vHNF1 and HNF1 homeoproteins in early postimplantation embryos suggest distinct and sequential developmental roles. Development 116, 783-797.
11. Chavrier, R, Zerial, M., Lemaire, R, Almendral, J., Bravo, R. and Charnay, P. (1988). A gene encoding a protein with zinc fingers is activated during G0/G1 transition in cultured cells. EMBO J. 7, 29-35.
12. Cheng, Y. C., Amoyel, M., Qiu, X., Jiang, Y. J., Xu, Q. and Wilkinson, D. G. (2004). Notch activation regulates the segregation and differentiation of rhombomere boundary cells in the zebrafish hindbrain. Dev. Cell 6, 539-550.
13. Chisaka, O. and Capecchi, M. R. (1991). Regionally restricted developmental defects resulting from targeted disruption of the mouse homeobox gene hox-1.5. Nature 350, 473-479.
14. Chisaka, O., Musci, T. S. and Capecchi, M. R. (1992). Developmental defects of the ear, cranial nerves and hindbrain resulting from targeted disruption of the mouse homeobox gene Hox-1.6. Nature 355, 516-520.
15. Choe, S. K. and Sagerstrom, C. G. (2004). Paralog group 1 hox genes regulate rhombomere 5/6 expression of vhnf 1, a repressor of rostral hindbrain fates, in a meis-dependent manner. Dev. Biol. 271, 350-361.
16. Choe, S. K., Vlachakis, N. and Sagerstrom, C. G. (2002). Meis family proteins are required for hindbrain development in the zebrafish. Development 129, 585-595.
17. Clarke, J. D., Erskine, L. and Lumsden, A. (1998). Differential progenitor dispersal and the spatial origin of early neurons can explain the predominance of single-phenotype clones in the chick hindbrain. Dev. Dyn. 212, 14-26.
18. Cordes, S. P. and Barsh, G. S. (1994). The mouse segmentation gene kr encodes a novel basic domain-leucine zipper transcription factor. Cell 79, 1025-1034.
19. Dearolf, C. R., Topol, J. and Parker, C. S. (1989). Transcriptional control of Drosophila fushi tarazu zebra stripe expression. Genes Dev. 3, 384-398.
20. Deflorian, G., Tiso, N., Ferretti, E., Meyer, D., Blasi, F., Bortolussi, M. and Argenton, F. (2004). Prep1.1 has essential genetic functions in hindbrain development and cranial neural crest cell differentiation. Development 131, 613-627.
21. Dolle, P., Lufkin, T., Krumlauf, R., Mark, M., Duboule, D. and Chambon, P. (1993). Local alterations of Krox-20 and Hox gene expression in the hindbrain suggest lack of rhombomeres 4 and 5 in homozygote null Hoxa-1 (Hox-1.6) mutant embryos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 7666-7670.
22. Dupe, V. and Lumsden, A. (2001). Hindbrain patterning involves graded responses to retinoic acid signalling. Development 128, 2199-2208.
23. Duret, L. and Bucher, P. (1997). Searching for regulatory elements in human noncoding sequences. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7, 399-406.
24. Fraser, S., Keynes, R. and Lumsden, A. (1990). Segmentation in the chick embryo hindbrain is defined by cell lineage restrictions. Nature 344, 431-435.
25. Frazer, K. A., Pachter, L., Poliakov, A., Rubin, E. M. and Dubchak, I.(2004). VISTA: computational tools for comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, W273-W279.
26. Frohman, M. A., Martin, G. R., Cordes, S. P., Halamek, L. P. and Barsh, G. S. (1993). Altered rhombomere-specific gene expression and hyoid bone differentiation in the mouse segmentation mutant, kreisler (kr). Development 117, 925-936.
27. Gavalas, A. and Krumlauf, R. (2000). Retinoid signalling and hindbrain patterning. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10, 380-386.
28. Gavalas, A., Studer, M., Lumsden, A., Rijil, F. M., Krumlauf, R. and Chambon, P. (1998). Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 synergize in patterning the hindbrain, cranial nerves and second pharyngeal arch. Development 125, 1123-1136.
29. Ghislain, J. and Charnay, R (2006). Control of myelination in Schwann cells: a Krox20 cis-regulatory element integrates Oct6, Brn2 and Sox10 activities. EMBO Rep. 7, 52-58.
30. Ghislain, J., Desmarquet-Trin-Dinh, C., Jaegle, M., Meijer, D., Charnay, P. and Frain, M. (2002). Characterisation of cis-acting sequences reveals a biphasic, axon-dependent regulation of Krox20 during Schwann cell development. Development 129, 155-166.
31. Ghislain, J., Desmarquet-Trin-Dinh, C., Gilardi-Hebenstreit, P., Charnay, P. and Frain, M. (2003). Neural crest patterning: autoregulatory and crest-specific elements co-operate for Krox20 transcriptional control. Development 130, 941-953.
32. Giudicelli, F., Taillebourg, E., Charnay, P. and Gilardi-Hebenstreit, P. (2001). Krox-20 patterns the hindbrain through both cell-autonomous and non cell-autonomous mechanisms. Genes Dev. 15, 567-580.
33. Han, W., Yu, Y., Su, K., Kohanski, R. A. and Pick, L. (1998). A binding site for multiple transcriptional activators in the fushi tarazu proximal enhancer is essential for gene expression in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 3384-3394.
34. Helmbacher, F., Pujades, C., Desmarquet, C., Frain, M., Rijli, F. M., Chambon, P. and Charnay, P. (1998). Hoxa1 and Krox-20 synergize to control the development of rhombomere 3. Development 125, 4739-4748.
35. Hernandez, R. E., Rikhof, H. A., Bachmann, R. and Moens, C. B. (2004). vhnf1 integrates global RA patterning and local FGF signals to direct posterior hindbrain development in zebrafish. Development 131, 4511-4520.
36. Irving, C., Nieto, M. A., DasGupta, R., Charnay, P. and Wilkinson, D. G. (1996). Progressive spatial restriction of Sek-1 and Krox-20 gene expression during hindbrain segmentation. Dev. Biol. 173, 26-38.
37. Kulesa, P. M. and Fraser, S. E. (2000). In ovo time-lapse analysis of chick hindbrain neural crest cell migration shows cell interactions during migration to the branchial arches. Development 127, 1161-1172.
38. Levi, G., Topilko, P., Schneider-Maunoury, S., Lasagna, M., Mantero, S., Cancedda, R. and Charnay, P. (1996). Defective bone formation in Krox-20 mutant mice. Development 122,113-120.
39. Loots, G. G., Ovcharenko, I., Pachter, L., Dubchak, I. and Rubin, E. M. (2002). rVista for comparative sequence-based discovery of functional transcription factor binding sites. Genome Res. 12, 832-839.
40. Lufkin, T., Dierich, A., LeMeur, M., Mark, M. and Chambon, P. (1991). Disruption of the Hox-1.6 homeobox gene results in defects in a region corresponding to its rostral domain of expression. Cell 66, 1105-1119.
41. Lumsden, A. and Keynes, R. (1989). Segmental patterns of neuronal development in the chick hindbrain. Nature 337, 424-428.
42. Lumsden, A. and Krumlauf, R. (1996). Patterning the vertebrate neuraxis. Science 274, 1109-1115.
43. Lumsden, A., Sprawson, N. and Graham, A. (1991). Segmental origin and migration of neural crest cells in the hindbrain region of the chick embryo. Development 113, 1281-1291.
44. Manzanares, M., Cordes, S., Ariza-McNaughton, L., Sadl, V., Maruthainar, K., Barsh, G. and Krumlauf, R. (1999). Conserved and distinct roles of kreisler in regulation of the paralogous Hoxa3 and Hoxb3 genes. Development 126, 759-769.
45. Manzanares, M., Nardelli, J., Gilardi-Hebenstreit, P., Marshall, H., Gludicelli, F, Martinez-Pastor, M. T., Krumlauf, R. and Charnay, P. (2002). Krox20 and kreisler co-operate in the transcriptional control of segmental expression of Hoxb3 in the developing hindbrain. EMBO J. 21, 365-376.
46. Marin, F. and Charnay, P. (2000). Hindbrain patterning: FGFs regulate Krox20 and mafB/kr expression in the otic/preotic region. Development 127, 4925-4935.
47. Mark, M., Lufkin, T., Vonesch, J. L., Ruberte, E., Olivo, J. C., Dolle, P., Gorry, P., Lumsden, A. and Chambon, P. (1993). Two rhombomeres are altered in Hoxa-1 mutant mice. Development 119, 319-338.
48. Maves, L., Jackman, W. and Kimmel, C. B. (2002). FGF3 and FGF8 mediate a rhombomere 4 signaling activity in the zebrafish hindbrain. Development 129, 3825-3837.
49. McKay, I. J., Muchamore, I., Krumlauf, R., Maden, M., Lumsden, A. and Lewis, J. (1994). The kreisler mouse: a hindbrain segmentation mutant that lacks two rhombomeres. Development 120, 2199-2211.
50. McNulty, C. L., Peres, J. N., Bardine, N., van den Akker, W. M. and Durston, A. J. (2005). Knockdown of the complete Hox paralogous group 1 leads to dramatic hindbrain and neural crest defects. Development 132, 2861-2871.
51. Moens, C. B., Yan, Y. L., Appel, B., Force, A. G. and Kimmel, C. B. (1996). valentino: a zebrafish gene required for normal hindbrain segmentation. Development 122, 3981-3990.
52. Nardelli, J., Gibson, T. and Charnay, P. (1992). Zinc finger-DNA recognition: analysis of base specificity by site-directed mutagenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 4137-4144.
53. Niederreither, K., Vermot, J., Le Roux, I., Schuhbaur, B., Chambon, P. and Dolle, P. (2003). The regional pattern of retinoic acid synthesis by RALDH2 is essential for the development of posterior pharyngeal arches and the enteric nervous system. Development 130, 2525-2534.
54. Nieto, M. A., Bradley, L. C. and Wilkinson, D. G. (1991). Conserved segmental expression of Krox-20 in the vertebrate hindbrain and its relationship to lineage restriction. Development Suppl. 2, 59-62.
55. Nonchev, S., Maconochie, M., Vesque, C., Aparicio, S., Ariza-McNaughton, L., Manzanares, M., Maruthainar, K., Kuroiwa, A., Brenner, S., Charnay, P. et al. (1996a). The conserved role of Krox-20 in directing Hox gene expression during vertebrate hindbrain segmentation. Proc. Natt. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 9339-9345.
56. Nonchev, S., Vesque, C., Maconochie, M., Seitanidou, T., Ariza-McNaughton, L., Frain, M., Marshall, H., Sham, M. H., Krumlauf, R. and Charnay, P (1996b). Segmental expression of Hoxa-2 in the hindbrain is directly regulated by Krox-20. Development 122, 543-554.
57. Nordstrom, U., Jessell, T. M. and Edlund, T. (2002). Progressive induction of caudal neural character by graded Wnt signaling. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 525-532.
58. Oxtoby, E. and Jowett, T. (1993). Cloning of the zebrafish krox-20 gene (krx-20) and its expression during hindbrain development. Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 1087-1095.
59. Pasini, A. and Wilkinson, D. G. (2002). Stabilizing the regionalisation of the developing vertebrate central nervous system. BioEssays 24, 427-438.
60. Prochiantz, A. and Joliot, A. (2003). Can transcription factors functions as cell-cell signalling molecules? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 814-819.
61. Riddihough, G. and Ish-Horowicz, D. (1991). Individual stripe regulatory elements in the Drosophila hairy promoter respond to maternal, gap, and pair-rule genes. Genes Dev. 5, 840-854.
62. Rijli, F. M., Mark, M., Lakkaraju, S., Dierich, A., Dolle, P. and Chambon, P. (1993). A homeotic transformation is generated in the rostral branchial region of the head by disruption of Hoxa-2, which acts as a selector gene. Cell 75, 1333-1349.
63. Rijli. F. M., Gavalas, A. and Chambon, P. (1998). Segmentation and specification in the branchial region of the head: the role of the Hox selector genes. Int. J. Dev Biol. 42, 393-401.
64. Rossel, M. and Capecchi, M. R. (1999). Mice mutant for both Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 show extensive remodeling of the hindbrain and defects in craniofacial development. Development 126, 5027-5040.
65. Schneider-Maunoury, S., Topilko, P., Seitandou, T. Levi, G., Cohen-Tannoudji, M., Pournin, S., Babinet, C. and Charnay, P. (1993). Disruption of Krox-20 results in alteration of rhombomeres 3 and 5 in the developing hindbrain. Cell 175, 1199-1214.
66. Seitanidou, T, Schneider-Maunoury, S., Desmarquet, C., Wilkinson, D. G. and Charnay, P. (1997). Krox-20 is a key regulator of rhombomere-specific gene expression in the developing hindbrain. Mech. Dev. 65, 31-42.
67. Serbedzija, G. N., Bronner-Fraser, M. and Fraser, S. E. (1992). Vital dye analysis of cranial neural crest cell migration in the mouse embryo. Development 116, 297-307.
68. Sham, M. H., Vesque, C., Nonchev, S., Marshall, H., Frain, M., Gupta, R. D., Whiting, J., Wilkinson, D., Charnay, P. and Krumlauf, R. (1993). The zinc finger gene Krox20 regulates HoxB2 (Hox2.8) during hindbrain segmentation. Cell 72,183-196.
69. Small, S., Blair, A. and Levine, M. (1996). Regulation of two pair-rule stripes by a single enhancer in the Drosophila embryo. Dev. Biol. 175, 314-324.
70. Studer, M., Lumsden, A., Ariza-McNaughton, L., Bradley, A. and Krumlauf, R. (1996). Altered segmental identity and abnormal migration of motor neurons in mice lacking Hoxb-1. Nature 384, 630-634.
71. Sun, Z. and Hopkins, N. (2001). vhnf1, the MODY5 and familial GCKD-associated gene, regulates regional specification of the zebrafish gut, pronephros, and hindbrain. Genes Dev. 15, 3217-3229.
72. Swiatek, P. J., Gridley, T., Ariza-McNaughton, L., Frain, M., Marshall, H., Sham, M. H., Krumlauf, R. and Charnay, P. (1993). Perinatal lethality and defects in hindbrain development in mice homozygous for a targeted mutation of the zinc finger gene Krox2O. Genes Dev. 7, 2071-2084.
73. Swirnoff, A. H. and Milbrandt, J. (1995). DNA-binding specificity of NGFI-A and related zinc finger transcription factors. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 2275-2287.
74. Theil, T., Frain, M., Gilardi-Hebenstreit, P., Flenniken, A., Charnay, P. and Wilkinson, D. G. (1998). Segmental expression of the EphA4 (Sek-1) receptor tyrosine kinase in the hindbrain is under direct transcriptional control of Krox-20. Development 125, 443-452.
75. Topilko, P., Schneider-Maunoury, S., Levi, G., Baron-Van Evercooren, A., Chennoufi, A. B., Seltanidou, T., Babinet, C. and Charnay, P. (1994). Krox-20 controls myelination in the peripheral nervous system. Nature 371, 796-799.
76. Trainor, P. A. and Krumlauf, R. (2000). Patterning the cranial neural crest: hindbrain segmentation and Hox gene plasticity Nat Rev. Neurosci. 1, 116-124.
77. Trainor, P. A., Sobieszczuk, D., Wilkinson, D. and Krumlauf, R. (2002). Signalling between the hindbrain and paraxial tissues dictates neural crest migration pathways. Development 129, 433-442.
78. Tronche, F., Ringeisen, F., Blumenfeld, M., Yaniv, M. and Pontoglio, M. (1997). Analysis of the distribution of binding sites for a tissue-specific transcription factor in the vertebrate genome. J. Mol. Biol. 266, 231-245.
79. Vaage, S. (1969). The segmentation of the primitive neural tube in chick embryos (Gallus domesticus). A morphological, histochemical and autoradiographical investigation. Ergeb. Anat. Entwicklungsgesch. 41, 3-87.
80. Vesque, C., Maconochie, M., Nonchev, S., Ariza-McNaughton, L., Kuroiwa, A., Charnay, P. and Krumlauf, R. (1996). Hoxb-2 transcriptional activation in rhombomeres 3 and 5 requires an evolutionarily conserved cis-acting element in addition to the Krox-20 binding site. EMBO J. 15, 5383-5396.
81. Voiculescu, O., Charnay, P. and Schneider-Maunoury, S. (2000). Expression pattern of a Krox-20/Cre knock-in allele in the developing hindbrain, bones, and peripheral nervous system. Genesis 26, 123-126.
82. Voiculescu, O., Taillebourg, E., Pujades, C., Kress, C., Buart, S., Charnay, P. and Schneider-Maunoury, S. (2001). Hindbrain patterning: Krox20 couples segmentation and specification of regional identity. Development 128, 4967-4978.
83. Walshe, J., Maroon, H., McGonnell, I. M., Dickson, C. and Mason, I. (2002). Establishment of hindbrain segmental identity requires signaling by FGF3 and FGF8. Curr. Biol. 12,1117-1123.
84. Waskiewicz, A. J., Rikhof, H. A., Hernandez, R. E. and Moens, C. B. (2001). Zebrafish Meis functions to stabilize Pbx proteins and regulate hindbrain patterning. Development 128, 4139-4151.
85. Waskiewicz, A. J., Rikhof, H. A. and Moens, C. B. (2002). Eliminating zebrafish pbx proteins reveals a hindbrain ground state. Dev. Cell 3, 723-733.
86. Wiellette, E. L. and Sive, H. (2003). vhnf1 and Fgf signals synergize to specify rhombomere identity in the zebrafish hindbrain. Development 130, 3821-3829.
87. Wilkinson, B. L., Sadler, K. A. and Hyson, R. L. (2002). Rapid deafferentation-induced upregulation of bcl-2 mRNA in the chick cochlear nucleus. Mol. Brain Res. 99, 67-74.
88. Wilkinson, D. G., Bhatt, S., Chavrier, P., Bravo, R. and Charnay, P. (1989). Segment-specific expression of a zinc-finger gene in the developing nervous system of the mouse. Nature 337, 461-464.
89. Wingate, R. J. and Lumsden, A. (1996). Persistence of rhombomeric organisation in the postsegmental hindbrain. Development 122, 2143-2152.
90. Wingender, E., Chen, X., Hehl, R., Karas, H., Liebich, I., Matys, V., Meinhardt, T, Pruss, M., Reuter, I.. and Schacherer, F. (2000). TRANSFAC: an integrated system for gene expression regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 316-319.
91. Yee, S. P. and Rigby, P. W. (1993). The regulation of myogenin gene expression during the embryonic development of the mouse. Genes Dev. 7, 1277-1289.