Efficient synthesis of small molecule macroarrays: optimization of the macroarray synthesis platform and examination of microwave and conventional heating methods

Tetrahedron

Volumn 62, Issue 19, 2006, Pages 4715-4727

  Bowman, Matthew D ^a   Jacobson, Megan M ^a   Pujanauski, Brian G ^a   Blackwell, Helen E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHALCONE DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL REACTION; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY; DERIVATIZATION; HEAT TREATMENT; HIGH TEMPERATURE; MICROWAVE IRRADIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURIFICATION; REACTION ANALYSIS; SYNTHESIS;

EID: 33645959862     PISSN: 00404020     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2006.02.083     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Ley S.V., and Baxendale I.R. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 1 (2002) 573-586 and references therein
2. Lam K.S., and Renil M. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 6 (2002) 353-358
3. Newkome G.R., Childs B.J., Rourk M.J., Baker G.R., and Moorefield C.N. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 61 (1999) 243-253
4. Wang J., Yoo Y., Gao C., Takeuchi I., Sun X., Chang H., Xiang X.-D., and Schultz P.G. Science 279 (1998) 1712-1714
5. Mello J.V., and Finney N.S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 (2005) 10124-10125
6. Winssinger N., Harris J.L., Backes B.J., and Schultz P.G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 40 (2001) 3152-3155
7. Hergenrother P.J., Depew K.M., and Schreiber S.L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122 (2000) 7849-7850
8. Figeys D., Ducret A., Yates III J.R., and Aebersold R. Nat. Biotechnol. 11 (1996) 1544
9. Burke M.D., Berger E.M., and Schreiber S.L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 (2005) 1973-1996
10. Boyle N.A., and Janda K.D. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 6 (2002) 339-346
11. Tan D.S., and Burbaum J.J. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Devel. 3 (2000) 439-453
12. Li W.B., and Yan B. J. Org. Chem. 63 (1998) 4092-4097
13. Frank R. Tetrahedron 48 (1992) 9217-9232
14. For recent reviews of SPOT-synthesis, see:. Frank R. J. Immunol. Methods 267 (2002) 13-26
15. Reineke U., Volkmer-Engert R., and Schneider-Mergener J. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 12 (2001) 59-64
16. 2).
17. Reineke U., Volkmer-Engert R., and Schneider-Mergener J. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 12 (2001) 59-64 and references therein
18. Hilpert K., Volkmer-Engert R., Walter T., and Hancock R.E.W. Nat. Biotechnol. 23 (2005) 1008-1012
19. For selected examples, see:
20. Scharn D., Germeroth L., Schneider-Mergener J., and Wenschuh H. J. Org. Chem. 66 (2001) 507-513
21. Jobron L., and Hummel G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 39 (2000) 1621-1624
22. Ast T., Heine N., Germeroth L., Schneider-Mergener J., and Wenschuh H. Tetrahedron Lett. 40 (1999) 4317-4318
23. For recent commentaries on MW-assisted combinatorial chemistry, see:
24. Blackwell H.E. Org. Biomol. Chem. 1 (2003) 1251-1255
25. Kappe C.O. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 6 (2002) 314-320
26. For recent reviews on MW-assisted organic chemistry, see:
27. Kappe C.O. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43 (2004) 6250-6284
28. Santagada V., Frecentese F., Perissutti E., Favretto L., and Caliendo G. QSAR Comb. Sci. 23 (2004) 919-944
29. Bowman M.D., Jeske R.C., and Blackwell H.E. Org. Lett. 6 (2004) 2019-2022
30. Lin Q., O'Neill J.C., and Blackwell H.E. Org. Lett. 7 (2005) 4455-4458
31. Wang S.S. J. Am. Chem. Soc 95 (1973) 1328-1333
32. Amine functionalization levels were determined by derivatization of support 3 with Fmoc-OSu, cleavage of the N-Fmoc group with piperidine, and quantitation of released fulvene product using UV spectroscopy (at 296 nm) according to standard procedures. See:. Carpino L.A., and Han G.Y. J. Org. Chem. 37 (1972) 3404-3409
33. Scharn D., Wenschuh H., Reineke U., Schneider-Mergener J., and Germeroth L. J. Comb. Chem. 2 (2000) 361-369
34. For further information about this commercial MW reactor system, see:. http://www.milestonesci.com/index2.php
35. Performing this MW-assisted reaction using automated temperature control during the reaction was not possible due to the low solvent volumes used.
36. Linker loading on support determined by quantifying the amount of free amine (using standard UV Fmoc analysis; see Ref. 22) on the support before and after coupling of the pro-linker unit and its reduction. The difference between these two values was indicative of the amount of linker coupled to the support.
37. Sheppard R.C., and Williams B.J. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 20 (1982) 451-454
38. Stuerga D., and Gaillard P. Tetrahedron 52 (1996) 5505-5510
39. Kröhnke F. Synthesis (1976) 1-24
40. Cave G.W.V., and Raston C.L. Chem. Commun. (2000) 2199-2200
41. Constable E.C., Harverson P., Smith D.R., and Whall L.A. Tetrahedron 50 (1994) 7799-7806
42. Zimmerman S.C., VanZyl C.M., and Hamilton G.S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111 (1989) 1373-1381
43. See Ref. 5;
44. Fang A.G., Mello J.V., and Finney N.S. Tetrahedron 60 (2004) 11075-11087
45. Weiss M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 74 (1952) 200-202
46. Tu S., Li T., Shi F., Fang F., Zhu S., Wei X., and Zong Z. Chem. Lett. 34 (2005) 732-733
47. Grosche P., Höltzel A., Walk T.B., Trautwein A.W., and Jung G. Synthesis 11 (1999) 1961-1970
48. For further information about this commercial MW reactor system, see:. http://www.cem.com/
49. Purity and yields determined by integration of HPLC spectra at 254 nm and comparison to a UV calibration curve generated for triarylpyridine 16r. See Supplementary material.
50. For a recent commentary on this process, see:. Alcázar J. J. Comb. Chem. 7 (2005) 353-355
51. Padilla-Tosta M.E., Lloris J.M., Martinez-Màñez R., Marcos M.D., Miranda M.A., Pardo T., Sancenón F., and Soto J. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. (2001) 1475-1482
52. Gao F.G., and Bard A.J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122 (2000) 7426-7427
53. Bowman M.D., Jacobson M.M., and Blackwell H.E. Org. Lett. (2006) in press
54. Webb T.R. Synthesis (1984) 213-214