Comment: Chromatin physics: Replacing multiple, representation-centered descriptions at discrete scales by a continuous, function-dependent self-scaled model

European Physical Journal E

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 379-384

  Lavelle, C ^a   Benecke, A ^b  

^a INSTITUT DE RADIOPROTECTION ET DE SÛRETÉ NUCLÉAIRE   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUNCTIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

CHROMATIN; DISCRETE SCALES; FUNCTION-DEPENDENT SELF-SCALED MODEL; REPRESENTATION-CENTERED DESCRIPTIONS;

BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS;

DNA;

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOPHYSICS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; CHROMATIN; GENETICS; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEOSOME; REVIEW;

BIOPHYSICS; CHROMATIN; DNA; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NUCLEOSOMES;

EID: 33645278321     PISSN: 12928941     EISSN: 1292895X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1140/epje/i2005-10059-9     Document Type: Review

References (75)

1. J.D. Watson, F.H. Crick, Nature 171, 737 (1953).
2. H.E. Avery, C.M. MacLeod, M. McCarty, J. Exp. Med. 79, 137 (1944).
3. U. Bockelmann, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 14, 368 (2004).
4. P. Mangeol et al., Probing DNA and RNA single molecules with a double optical tweezer, this issue, p. 311.
5. C.H. Lee et al., Comparison of the measured phase diagrams in the force-temperature plane for the unzipping of two different natural DNA sequences, this issue, p. 339.
6. G. Anselmi et al., Biophys. Chem. 95, 23 (2002).
7. T.E. Cloutier, J. Widom, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 3645 (2005).
8. J. Yan, J.F. Marko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 108108 (2004).
9. M.T. Rivero et al., Exp. Cell Res. 295, 161 (2004).
10. A.E. Vinogradov, Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 1838 (2003).
11. R. Bundschuh, U. Gerland, Dynamics of intramolecular recognition: Base-pairing in DNA/RNA near and far from equilibrium, this issue, p. 319.
12. S.E. Halford, J.F. Marko, Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 3040 (2004).
13. R.V. Polozov et al., J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 16, 1135 (1999).
14. A. Bird, Genes Dev. 16, 6 (2002).
15. K.D. Robertson, Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 597 (2005).
16. T.M. Geiman, K.D. Robertson, J. Cell. Biochem. 87, 117 (2002).
17. R.D. Kornberg, Science 184, 868 (1974).
18. M. Noll, Nature 251, 249 (1974).
19. R.D. Kornberg, Y. Lorch, Cell 98, 285 (1999).
20. R.T. Kamakaka, S. Biggins, Genes Dev. 19, 295 (2005).
21. C.L. Peterson, M.A. Laniel, Curr. Biol. 14, R546 (2004).
22. A. Sivolob, C. Lavelle, A. Prunell, J. Mol. Biol. 326, 49 (2003).
23. H. Schiessel, The nucleosome: A transparent, slippery, sticky and yet stable DNA-protein complex, this issue, p. 251.
24. A. Sivolob, A. Prunell, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 362, 1519 (2004).
25. F. De Lucia et al., J. Mol. Biol. 285, 1101 (1999).
26. A. Bancaud et al., Structural dynamics of single chromatin fibres revealed by torsional manipulation, submitted.
27. C. Lavelle, A. Sivolob, A. Prunell, in preparation.
28. C.P. Prior et al., Cell 34, 1033 (1983).
29. J. Mozziconacci, J.M. Victor, J. Struct. Biol. 143, 72 (2003).
30. M. Alilat et al., J. Mol. Biol. 291, 815 (1999).
31. A. Hamiche et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 7588 (1996).
32. P.B. Becker, EMBO J. 21, 4749 (2002).
33. A. Flaus, T. Owen-Hughes, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 14, 165 (2004).
34. C.J. Brandl, K. Struhl, Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 4256 (1990).
35. M. Kanduri et al., Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 3339 (2002).
36. N. Gilbert, J. Allan, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 11949 (2001).
37. C. Vaillant et al., Formation and positioning of nucleosomes: Effect of sequence-dependent long-range correlated structural disorder, this issue, p. 263.
38. Y.Y. Hsu, Y.H. Wang, J. Biol. Chem. 277, 17315 (2002).
39. D.T. Kirkpatrick et al., Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 7661 (1999).
40. C. Anselmi et al., Biophys. J. 79, 601 (2000).
41. V.G. Levitsky, Nucleic Acids Res. 32 (Web Server issue), W346-9 (2004).
42. A. Lesne, J.-M. Victor, Chromatin fiber functional organization: Some plausible models, this issue, p. 279.
43. J. Zlatanova, S.H. Leuba, J. Mol. Biol. 331, 1 (2003).
44. C. Claudet, J. Bednar, Pulling the chromatin, this issue, p. 331.
45. T.A. Blank, P.B. Becker, J. Mol. Biol. 252, 305 (1995).
46. F. Fuks, The view from the biochemist, this issue, p. 367.
47. A. Benecke, Chromatin code, local non-equilibrium dynamics, and the emergence of transcription regulatory programs, this issue, p. 353.
48. Y. Huyen et al., Nature 432, 406 (2004).
49. S. Henikoff, Y. Dalal, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 15, 177 (2005).
50. E.R. Foster, J.A. Downs, FEBS J. 272, 3231 (2005).
51. A.S. Belmont et al., Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 11, 307 (1999).
52. A.S. Belmont, K. Bruce, J. Cell. Biol. 127, 287 (1994).
53. K. Byrd, V.G. Corces, J. Cell. Biol. 162, 565 (2003).
54. D. Sproul, N. Gilbert, W.A. Bickmore, Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 775 (2005).
55. D. Carter et al., Nat. Genet. 32, 623 (2002).
56. P.R. Cook, J. Cell. Sci. 116, 4483 (2003).
57. J.R. Swedlow, T. Hirano, Mol. Cell 11, 557 (2003).
58. B.D. Lavoie, E. Hogan, D. Koshland, J. Cell. Biol. 156, 805 (2002).
59. S. Almagro et al., J. Biol. Chem. 279, 5118 (2004).
60. J.F. Marko, M.G. Poirier, Biochem. Cell. Biol. 81, 209 (2003).
61. J. Mozziconacci et al., FEBS Lett. 580, 368 (2006).
62. T. Cremer, C. Cremer, Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 292 (2001).
63. T. Cremer et al., Biol. Cell 96, 555 (2004).
64. T. Misteli, Bioessays 27, 477 (2005).
65. S. Kozubek et al., Chromosoma 108, 426 (1999).
66. T. Misteli, Cell 119, 153 (2004).
67. L. Parada, T. Misteli, Trends Cell. Biol. 12, 425 (2002).
68. L.A. Parada, P.G. McQueen, T. Misteli, Genome Biol. 5, R44 (2004).
69. D. Gerlich et al., Cell 112, 751 (2003).
70. E.M. Manders et al., Chromosome Res. 11, 537 (2003).
71. J. Langowski, Polymer chain models of DNA and chromatin, this issue, p. 241.
72. G. Li et al., Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 46 (2005).
73. S. Henikoff, T. Furuyama, K. Ahmad, Trends Genet. 20, 320 (2004).
74. R. Blossey, Regulating chromatin: On code and dynamic models, this issue, p. 371.
75. J.-F. Allemand et al., Loops in DNA: An overview of experimental and theoretical approaches, this issue, p. 293.