Effect of incomplete crown ferrules on load capacity of endodontically treated maxillary incisors restored with fiber posts, composite build-ups, and all-ceramic crowns: An in vitro evaluation after chewing simulation

Acta Odontologica Scandinavica

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 31-36

  Naumann, Michael ^a,c   Preuss, Anja ^a   Rosentritt, Martin ^b  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^c Department of Prosthodontics and Geriatric Dentistry ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

Ferrule effect; Fracture load; Post and core

Indexed keywords

GLASS FIBER;

ARTICLE; CERAMICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; INCISOR; INJURY; KRUSKAL WALLIS TEST; MASTICATION; MAXILLA; RANK SUM TEST; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

COMPOSITE RESINS; CROWNS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; GLASS; HUMANS; INCISOR; MASTICATION; MAXILLA; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 31544461558     PISSN: 00016357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016350500331120     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Sedgley CM, Messer HH. Are endodontically treated teeth more brittle? J Endod 1992;18:332-5.
2. Steele A, Johnson BR. In vitro fracture strength of endodontically treated premolars. J Endod 1999;25:6-8.
3. Howe CA, McKendry DJ. Effect of endodontic access preparation on resistance to crown-root fracture. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;121:712-5.
4. Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod 1989;15:512-6.
5. Stankiewicz NR, Wilson PR. The ferrule effect: a literature review. Int Endod J 2002;35:575-81.
6. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:529-36.
7. Libman WJ, Nicholls JI. Load fatigue of teeth restored with cast posts and cores and complete crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:155-61.
8. Mezzomo E, Massa F, Libera SD. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with two different post-and-core designs cemented with two different cements: an in vitro study. Part I. Quintessence Int 2003;34:301-6.
9. Zhi-Yue L, Yu-Xing Z. Effects of post-core design and ferrule on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:368-73.
10. Gegauff AG. Effect of crown lengthening and ferrule placement on static load failure of cemented cast post-cores and crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:169-79.
11. Saupe WA, Gluskin AH, Radke RA, Jr. A comparative study of fracture resistance between morphologic dowel and cores and a resin-reinforced dowel system in the intraradicular restoration of structurally compromised roots. Quintessence Int 1996;27:483-91.
12. Zerman N, Cavalleri G. Traumatic injuries to permanent incisors. Endod Dent Traumatol 1993;9:61-4.
13. Krejci I, Reich T, Lutz F, Albertoni M. An in vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems. 1. A computer-controlled mastication simulator. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1990;100:953-60.
14. Kern M, Strub JR, Lu XY. Wear of composite resin veneering materials in a dual-axis chewing simulator. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:372-8.
15. Butz F, Lennon AM, Heydecke G, Strub JR. Survival rate and fracture strength of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with moderate defects restored with different post-and-core systems: an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:58-64.
16. Heydecke G, Butz F, Strub JR. Fracture strength and survival rate of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with approximal cavities after restoration with different post and core systems: an in-vitro study. J Dent 2001;29:427-33.
17. Krejci I, Lutz F. In-vitro test results of the evaluation of dental restoration systems. Correlation with in-vivo results. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1990;100:1445-9.
18. Lundgren D, Laurell L. Occlusal force pattern during chewing and biting in dentitions restored with fixed bridges of cross-arch extension. I. Bilateral end abutments. J Oral Rehabil 1986;13:57-71.
19. Coca I, Schwickerath H. Zur Beanspruchung von Kronen im Frontzahnbereich. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1987;42:339-41.
20. Torbjorner A, Fransson B. Biomechanical aspects of prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:135-41.
21. Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:565-7.
22. Assif D, Oren E, Marshak BL, Aviv I. Photoelastic analysis of stress transfer by endodontically treated teeth to the supporting structure using different restorative techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:535-43.
23. Torbjorner A, Fransson B. A literature review on the prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:369-76.
24. Rosentritt M, Sikora M, Behr M, Handel G. In vitro fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of metallic and tooth-coloured post systems. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:675-81.
25. Heydecke G, Butz F, Hussein A, Strub JR. Fracture strength after dynamic loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:438-45.
26. Akkayan B, Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:431-7.