In vitro fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of metallic and tooth-coloured post systems

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 675-681

  Rosentritt, M ^a,b   Sikora, M ^a   Behr, M ^a   Handel, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ceramic post; Fracture resistance; Glassfibre post; Marginal fit; Post and core

Indexed keywords

CEMENT; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; CERAMICS; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INCISOR; MAXILLA; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TOOTH COLOR; TOOTH CROWN;

CEMENTATION; CROWNS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; GLASS; HUMANS; INCISOR; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TITANIUM; TOOTH FRACTURES;

EID: 3242725836     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01286.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent. 1999;27:275-278.
2. Cohen BI, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Comparison of the retentive properties of two hollow-tube post systems to those of a solid post design. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;70:234-238.
3. Kahn FH, Rosenberg PA, Schulman A, Pines M. Comparison of fatigue for three prefabricated post systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;75:148-153.
4. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Deutsch AS, Musikant BL. Fracture strengths of three core restorative materials supported with or without a prefabricated split-shank post. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78:560-565.
5. Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71: 565-567.
6. Gluskin AH, Radke RA, Frost SL, Watanabe LG. The mandibular incisor: rethinking guidelines for post and core design. J Endodont. 1995;21:33-37.
7. Dietschi D, Romelli M, Goretti A. Adaptation of adhesive posts and cores to dentin after fatigue testing. Int J Prosthodont. 1997;10:498-507.
8. Kwiatkowski S, Geller W. A preliminary consideration of the glass-ceramic dowel post and core. Int J Prosthodont. 1989;2:51-55.
9. Kern M, Pleimes AW, Strub JR. Fracture strengths of metallic and all-ceramic post- and core restorations. Dtsch Zahnärtzl Z. 1995;50:451-453.
10. Rosentritt M, Fürer C, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G. Comparison of in vitro fracture strength of metallic and tooth-coloured posts and cores. J Oral Rehabil. 2000;27:595-601.
11. Schmalz G, Federlin M, Reich E. Effect of dimension of luting space and luting composite on the marginal adaptation of a class II ceramic inlay. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73:392-399.
12. Krejci I, Lutz F. In-vitro test results of the evaluation of dental restoration systems. Correlation with in-vivo results. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1990;100:1445-1449.
13. Rosentritt M, Leibrock A, Lang R, Scharnagl M, Behr M, Handel G: Regensburger masticator. Materials testing. 1997;39:77-80.
14. Roulet JF, Reich T, Blunck U, Noack M. Quantitative margin analysis in the scanning electron microscopy. Scanning Microsc. 1989;3:147-158.
15. Rosentritt M, Plein T, Kolbeck C, Behr M, Handel G. In vitro fracture force and marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns fixed on natural and artificial teeth. Int J Prosthodont. 2000;13:387-391.
16. Goracci G, Mori G, Bazzucchi M. Marginal seal and biocompatibility of a fourth-generation bonding agent. Dent Mater. 1995;11:343-347.
17. Isidor F, Oedman P, Brondum K. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using pre-fabricated carbon fiber posts. Int J Prosthodont. 1996;9:131-136.
18. Killiarisis S, Kjellberg H, Wenneberg B, Engstrom C. The relationship between maximal force, bite force endurance, and facial morphology during growth. A cross-sectional study. Acta Odontol Scand. 1993;51:323-331.
19. Strub JR, Pontius O, Koutayas S. Survival rate and fracture strength of incisors restored with different post and core systems after exposure in the artificial mouth. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28:120-124.
20. Heydecke G, Butz F, Strub JR. Fracture strength and survuíval rate of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with approximal cavities after restoration with different post and core systems: an in-vitro study. J Dent. 2001;29:427-433.
21. Mendoza DB, Eakle WS. Retention of posts cemented with various dentinal bonding cements. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;72:591-594.
22. Cormier JC, Burns DR, Moon P. In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fiber, ceramic, and conventional post systems at various stages of restoration. J Prosthodont. 2001;10:26.
23. Ko CC, Chi CS, Chung KH, Lee MC. Effects of posts on dentin stress distribution in pulpless teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:421-427.
24. Assif D, Bitensky A, Pilo R, Oren E. Effect of post design on resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth with complete crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69:36.
25. Ho MH, Lee SY, Chen HH, Lee MC. Three-dimesnional finite element analysis of the effects of posts on stress distribution in dentin. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;72:367-372.
26. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;63:529.
27. Altshul JH, Marshall G, Morgan LA, Baumgartner JG. Comparison of dentinal crack incidence and of post removal time resulting from post removal by ultrasonic or mechanical force. J Endod. 1997;23:683-686.