A male-fertile Lycopersicon esculentum x Solanum lycopersicoides hybrid enables direct backcrossing to tomato at the diploid level

Euphytica

Volumn 95, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 99-108

  Chetelat, Roger T ^a   Cisneros, Pedro ^a   Stamova, Liliana ^a   Rick, Charles M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Botrytis cinerea; Breeding; Gray mold; Introgression; Isozymes; Tomato

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; SOLANUM LYCOPERSICOIDES;

EID: 0030992626     PISSN: 00142336     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1002958030799     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Andersen, W.R., 1963. Cytoplasmic sterility in hybrids of Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum pennellii. Rep Tomato Genet Coop 13: 7-8.
2. Ball, T. & C. Sink, 1988. Resistance to chilling injury in Solanum lycopersicoides + Lycopersicon esculentum somatic hybrids. Rep Tomato Genet Coop 38: 10.
3. Bournival, B.L., C.E. Vallejos & J.W. Scott, 1988. Two new enzyme loci for chromosome 1. Rep Tomato Genet Coop 38: 10-11.
4. Chetelat, R.T. & DeVerna, 1993. Map location of Malate dehydrogenase-1 (Mdh-1), a new marker for 3L. Rep Tomato Genet Coop 43: 13.
5. Chetelat, R.T., W. Pudlo & J.W. DeVerna, 1993a. Map location of Formate dehydrogenase-1 (Fdh-1), a new isozyme marker on 2L. Rep Tomato Genet Coop 43: 11-12.
6. Chetelat, R.T., C.M. Rick & J.W. DeVerna, 1989. Isozyme analysis, chromosome pairing, and fertility of Lycopersicon esculentum X Solanum lycopersicoides diploid backcross hybrids. Genome 32: 783-790.
7. Chetelat, R.T., M. Takahashi & J.W. DeVerna, 1993b. Map location of Diaphorase-3 (Dia-3), a new isozyme marker on 9S. Rep Tomato Genet Coop 43: 10.
8. DeVerna, J.W., R.T. Chetelat & C.M. Rick, 1987. Cytogenetic, electrophoretic, and morphological analysis of progeny of sesquidiploid Lycopersicon esculentum - Solanum lycopersicoides hybrids X L. pennellii. Biol Zent bl 106: 417-428.
9. DeVerna, J.W. & G.B. Collins, 1984. Maternal haploids of Petunia axillaris (Lam.) B.S.P. via culture of placenta attached ovules. Theor Appl Genet 69: 187-192.
10. Farley, J.D., W.L. George & E.A. Kerr, 1976. Resistance to Botrytis cinerea. Rep Tomato Genet Coop 26: 7.
11. Gradziel, T.M. & R.W. Robinson, 1989. Solanum lycopersicoides gene introgression to tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum, through the systematic avoidance and suppression of breeding barriers. Sex Plant Reprod 2: 43-52.
12. Guri, A., L.J. Dunbar & K.C. Sink, 1991. Somatic hybridization between selected Lycopersicon and Solanum species. Plant Cell Rep 10: 76-80.
13. Handley, L.W., R.L. Nickels, M.W. Cameron, P.P. Moore & K.C. Sink, 1986. Somatic hybrid plants between Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum lycopersicoides. Theor Appl Genet 71: 691-697.
14. Hossain, M., S. Imanishi & A. Matsumoto, 1994. Production of somatic hybrids between tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and nightshade (Solanum lycopersicoides) by electrofusion. Breeding Sci 44: 405-412.
15. Kamps, T.L., T.G. Isleib, R.C. Herner & K.C. Sink, 1987. Evaluation of techniques to measure chilling injury in tomato. HortSci 22: 1309-1312.
16. Khush, G.S. & C.M. Rick, 1963. Meiosis in hybrids between Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum pennellii. Genetica 33: 167-183.
17. Laemmlen, F.F. & K.C. Sink, 1978. Evaluation of Petunia cultivars for Botrytis resistance. Plant Dis Rep 62: 361-365.
18. Lavy-Meir, G., R. Barkai-Golan & E. Kopeliovitch, 1989. Resistance of tomato ripening mutants and their hybrids to Botrytis cinerea. Plant Dis 73: 976-978.
19. Levi, A., B.L. Ridley & K.C. Sink, 1988. Biased organelle transmission in somatic hybrids of Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum lycopersicoides. Curr Genet 14: 177-182.
20. 2 populations containing L. esculentum versus L. pennellii cytoplasm. Sex Plant Reprod 8: 361-368.
21. McCabe, P.f., L.J. Dunbar, A. Guri & K.C. Sink, 1993. T-DNA-tagged chromosome-12 in donor Lycopersicon esculentum X L. pennellii is retained in asymmetric somatic hybrids with recipient Solanum lycopersicoides. Theor Appl Genet 86: 377-382.
22. McClean, P.E. & M.R. Hanson, 1986. Mitochondrial DNA sequence divergence among Lycopersicon and related Solanum species. Genetics 112: 649-667.
23. McGuire, D.C. & C.M. Rick, 1954. Self-incompatibility in species of Lycopersicon Sect. Eriopersicon and hybrids with L. esculentum. Hilgardia 23: 101-123.
24. Menzel, M.Y., 1962. Pachytene chromosomes of the intergeneric hybrid Lycopersicon esculentum X Solanum lycopersicoides. Amer J Bot 49: 605-615.
25. Miller, J.C. & S.D. Tanksley, 1990. RFLP analysis of phylogenetic relationships and genetic variation in the genus Lycopersicon. Theor Appl Genet 80: 437-448.
26. Moore, P.P. & K.C. Sink, 1988. Characterization of a Lycopersicon esculentum X Solanum lycopersicoides somatic hybrid lacking a glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase isozyme. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 13: 39-47.
27. Neal, C.A. & L.D. Topoleski, 1983. Effects of the basal medium on growth of immature tomato embryos in vitro. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 108: 434-438.
28. Oleszek, W., S. Shannon & R.W. Robinson, 1986. Steroidal alkaloids of Solanum lycopersicoides. Acta Soc Bot Poloniae 55: 653-657.
29. Phills, B.R., R. Provvidenti & R.W. Robinson, 1977a. Reaction of Solanum lycopersicoides to viral diseases of the tomato. Rep Tomato Genet Coop 27: 18.
30. Phills, B.R., R.W. Robinson & J.W. Shail, 1977a. Evaluation of Solanum lycopersicoides for resistance to fungal disease and nematodes. Rep Tomato Genet Coop 27: 18-19.
31. Rick, C.M., 1951. Hybrids between Lycopersicon esculentum Mill, and Solanum lycopersicoides Dun. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 37: 741-744.
32. Rick, C.M., 1963. Differential zygotic lethality in a tomato species hybrid. Genetics 48: 1497-1507.
33. Rick, C.M., 1969. Controlled introgression of chromosomes of Solanum pennellii into Lycopersicon esculentum: segregation and recombination. Genetics 62: 753-768.
34. Rick, C.M., 1979. Biosystematic studies in Lycopersicon and closely related species of Solanum. In: J.G. Hawkes, R.N. Lester & A.D. Skelding (Eds), The Biology and Taxonomy of the Solanaceae, pp. 667-678.
35. Rick, C.M., 1983. Crossability between L. esculentum and a new race of L. peruvianum. Rep Tomato Genet Coop 33: 12.
36. Rick, C.M., 1988. Tomato-like nightshades: affinities, autecology, and breeders opportunities. Econ Bot 42: 145-154.
37. Rick, C.M., 1995. Tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum (Solanaceae). In: J. Smartt & N.W. Simmonds (Eds), Evolution of Crop Plants, 2nd Ed., pp. 452-457. Longman Scientific & Technical, London.
38. Rick, C.M. & R.T. Chetelat, 1995. Utilization of related wild species for tomato improvement. Acta Hort 412: 21-38.
39. Rick, C.M., R.T. Chetelat & J.W. DeVerna, 1988. Recombination in sesquidiploid hybrids of Lycopersicon esculentum X Solanum lycopersicoides and derivatives. Theor Appl Genet 76: 647-655.
40. Rick, C.M., J.W. DeVerna, R.T. Chetelat & M.A. Stevens, 1986. Meiosis in sesquidiploid hybrids of Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum lycopersicoides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 3580-3583.
41. Rick, C.M. & J.F. Fobes, 1975. Allozyme variation in the cultivated tomato and closely related species. Bull Torrey Bot Club 102: 376-384.
42. Rick, C.M., J.F. Fobes & S.D. Tanksley, 1979. Evolution of mating systems in Lycopersicon hirsutum as deduced from genetic variation in electrophoretic and morphological characters. Pl Syst Evol 132: 279-298.
43. Robinson, R.W. & B.R. Phills, 1977. Solanum lycopersicoides: a source of tolerance to low temperature. Rep Tomato Genet Coop 27: 25.
44. Spooner, D.M., G.J. Anderson & R.K. Jansen, 1993. Chloroplast DNA evidence for the interrelationships of tomatoes, potatoes, and pepinos (Solanaceae). Amer J Bot 80: 676-688.
45. Stall, R.E., 1991. Gray mold. In: J.B. Jones, J.P. Jones, R.E. Stall & T.A. Zitter (Eds), Compendium of Tomato Diseases, pp. 16-17. Amer Phytopath Soc Press, St. Paul.
46. Tanksley, S.D., M.W. Ganal, J.P. Prince, M.C. de Vicente, M.W. Bonierbale, P. Broun, T.M. Fulton, J.J. Giovanonni, S. Grandillo, G.B. Martin, R. Messeguer, J.C. Miller, L. Miller, A.H. Paterson, O. Pineda, M. Roder, R.A. Wing, W. Wu & N.D. Young, 1992. High density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics 132: 1141-1160.
47. Tanksley, S.D., H. Medina-Filho & C.M. Rick, 1982. Use of naturally occurring enzyme variation to detect and map genes controlling quantitative traits in an interspecific backcross of tomato. Heredity 49: 11-25.
48. Urbasch, I., 1986. Resistance of different cultivated and wild tomato plants (Lycopersicon spp.) to Botrytis cinerea Pers. J Phytopath 116: 344-351.
49. Wendel, J.F. & N.F. Weeden, 1989. Visualization and interpretation of plant isozymes. In: D.E. Soltis & P.S. Soltis (Eds), Isozymes in Plant Biology, pp. 5-45. Dioscorides Press, Portland.
50. Wolf, S., D. Yakir, M.A. Stevens & J. Rudich, 1986. Cold temperature tolerance of wild tomato species. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 111: 960-964.
51. Zamir, D. & Y. Tadmor, 1986. Unequal segregation of nuclear genes in plants. Bot Gaz 147: 355-358.