Chromosomal evolution and speciation: A recombination-based approach

New Phytologist

Volumn 161, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 107-112

  Livingstone, Kevin ^a,b   Rieseberg, Loren ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TRINITY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Chromosomal rearrangements; Karyotype; Karyotypic evolution; Recombination; Reproductive isolation; Speciation

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME; KARYOTYPE; RECOMBINATION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

MAGNOLIOPHYTA; SOLANACEAE;

EID: 0348019100     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00942.x     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology 215: 403-410.
2. Barton NH, Rouhani S. 1991. The probability of fixation of a new karyotype in a continuous population. Evolution 45: 499-517.
3. Bonierbale MW, Plaisted RL, Tanksley SD. 1988. RFLP maps based on a common set of clones reveal modes of chromosomal evolution in potato and tomato. Genetics 120: 1095-1103.
4. Carr GD. 1975. Chromosome evolution and aneuploid reduction in Calycadenia pauciflora (Asteraceae). Evolution 29: 681-699.
5. Carr GD. 1977, A cytological conspectus of the genus Calycadenia (Asteraceae): an example of contrasting modes of evolution. American Journal of Botany 64: 694-703.
6. Carr RL, Carr GD. 1983. Chromosome races and structural heterozygosity in Calycadenia ciliosa Greene (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 70: 744-755.
7. Carr GD, Carr RL. 2000. A new chromosome race of Calycadenia pauciflora (Asteraceae: Heliantheae-Madiinae) from Butte County, California. American Journal of Botany 87: 1459-1465.
8. Coyne JA, Aulard S, Berry A. 1991. Lack of underdominance in a naturally occurring pericentric inversion in Drosophila melanogaster and its implications for chromosome evolution. Genetics 129: 791-802.
9. Coyne JA, Meyers W, Crittenden AP, Sniegowski P. 1993. The fertility effects of pericentric inversions in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 134: 487-496.
10. Devos K, Gale MD. 2000. Genome relationships: the grass model in current research. Plant Cell 12: 637-646.
11. Doganlar S, Frary A, Daunay M-C, Lester RN, Tanksley SD. 2002. A comparative genetic linkage map for eggplant (Solanum melongena) and its implications for genome evolution in the Solanaceae. Genetics 161: 1697-1711.
12. Gale MD, Devos KM. 1998. Plant comparative generics after 10 years. Science 282: 656-658.
13. Grant V. 1981. Plant speciation. New York, USA: Columbia University Press.
14. Hedrick PW. 1981. The establishment of chromosomal variants. Evolution 35: 322-332.
15. Initiative TAG. 2000. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408: 796-815.
16. Lagercrantz U. 1998. Comparative mapping between Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica nigra indicates that Brassica genomes have evolved through extensive genome replication accompanied by chromosome fusions and frequent rearrangements. Genetics 150: 1217-1228.
17. Lande R. 1984. The expected fixation rate of chromosomal inversions. Evolution 38: 743-752.
18. Levin DA. 2002. The role of chromosomal change in plant evolution. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
19. Livingstone K, Churchill G, Jahn MK. 2000. Linkage mapping in populations with karyotypic rearrangements. Journal of Heredity 91: 423-428.
20. Livingstone KD, Lackney VK, Blauth JR, Van Wijk R, Jahn MK. 1999. Genome mapping in Capsicum and the evolution of genome structure in rhe Solanaceae. Genetics 152: 1183-1202.
21. Lynch M, Conery JS. 2000. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290: 1151-1155.
22. Lynch M, Force A. 2000a. The probability of duplicate gene preservation by subfunctionalization. Genetics 154: 459-473.
23. Lynch M, Force AG. 2000b. The origin of interspecific genomic incompatibility via gene duplication. American Naturalist 156: 590-605.
24. Navarro A, Barton NH. 2003a. Accumulating postzygotic isolation genes in parapatry: a new twist on chromosomal speciation. Evolution 57: 447-459.
25. Navarro A, Barton NH. 2003b. Chromosomal speciation and molecular divergence - accelerated evolution in rearranged chromosomes. Science 300: 321-324.
26. Noor MAF, Grams KL, Bertucci LA, Reiland J. 2001. Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98: 12084-12088.
27. Ortíz-Barrientos D, Reiland J, Hey J, Noor MAF. 2003. Recombination and the divergence of hybridizing species. Genetica 116: 167-178.
28. Paterson JT, Stone WS. 1952. Evolution in the genus Drosophila. New York, USA: Macmillan.
29. Perez F, Menedez A, Dehal P, Quiros CF. 1999. Genomic structural differentiation in Solanum: comparative mapping of the A- and E-genomes. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 98: 1183-1193.
30. Pertuzé RA, Ji Y, Chetelat RT. 2002. Comparative linkage map of the Solanum lycopersicoides and S. sitiens genomes and their differentiation from tomato. Genome 45: 1003-1012.
31. Rieseberg LH. 2001. Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16: 351-358.
32. Rieseberg LH, Whitton J, Gardner K. 1999. Hybrid zones and the genetic architecture of a barrier to gene flow between two sunflower species. Genetics 152: 713-727.
33. SanMiguel P, Tikhonov A, Jin Y-K, Molchalskia N, Zakharov D, Melake-Bernham A, Springer PS, Edwards KJ, Lee M, Auramova Z, Bennetzen JL. 1996. Nested retrotransposons in the intergenic regions of the maize genome. Science 274: 765-768.
34. Schaeffer SW, Goetting-Minesky MP, Kovacevic M, Peoples JR, Graybill JL, Miller JM, Kim K, Nelson JG, Anderson WA. 2003. Evolutionary genomics of inversions in Drosophila pseudoobscura: evidence for epistasis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 100: 8319-8324.
35. Snow R. 1960. Chromosomal differentiation in Clarkia dudleyana. American Journal of Botany 47: 302-309.
36. Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Tate JA. 2004. Advances in the study of polyploidy since plant speciation. New Phytologist 161: (In press.)
37. Spirito F. 1992. The exact values of the probability of fixation of underdominant chromosomal rearrangements. Theoretical Population Biology 41: 111-120.
38. Spirito F. 1998. The role of chromosomal change in speciation. In: Howard DJ, Berlocher SH, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. New York, USA: Oxford University Press, 320-329.
39. Tanksley SD, Ganal MW, Prince JP, et al. 1992. High density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics 132: 1141-1160.
40. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22: 4673-4680.
41. Walsh JB. 1982. Rate of accumulation of reproductive isolation by chromosome rearrangements. American Naturalist 120: 510-532.
42. Wedberg HL, Lewis H, Venkatesh CS. 1968. Translocation heterozygotes and supernumerary chromosomes in wild populations of Clarkia williamsonii. Evolution 22: 93-107.
43. Wright S. 1941. On the probability of fixation of reciprocal translocations. American Naturalist 75: 513-522.