Relational frame theory and stimulus equivalence: Conceptual and procedural issues;Relational frame theory y equivalencia estimular: Aspectos conceptuales y metodológicos

International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 181-214

  Barnes Holmes, Dermot ^a   Barnes Holmes, Yvonne ^a   Smeets, Paul M ^b   Cullinan, Veronica ^c   Leader, Geraldine ^d  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

^d NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Language; Precursor to the relational evaluation procedure; Relational frame theory; Respondent type training procedure; Stimulus equivalence

Indexed keywords

EID: 26444589532     PISSN: 15777057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (153)

1. Annett, J.M. & Leslie, J.C. (1995). Stimulus equivalence classes involving olfactory stimuli. The Psychological Record, 45, 439-450.
2. Aristotle (1941). De Memoria et Reminiscentia (J. I. Beare, trans.). In R. McKeon (Ed.), The basic works of Aristotle (pp. 607-617). New York: Random House.
3. Balorta, D.A. & Lorch, R.F. (1986). Depth of automatic spreading activation: Mediated priming effects in pronunciation but not in lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 336-345.
4. Barnes, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91-124.
5. Barnes, D., Browne, M., Smeets, P.M., & Roche, B. (1995). A transfer of functions and a conditional transfer of functions through equivalence relations in three to six year old children. The Psychological Record, 45, 405-430.
6. Barnes, D. & Hampson, P.J. (1993). Stimulus equivalence and connectionism: Implications for behavior analysis and cognitive science. The Psychological Record, 43, 617-638.
7. Barnes, D., Hegarty, N., & Smeets, P.M. (1997). Relating equivalence relations to equivalence relations: A relational framing model of complex human functioning. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 14, 1-27.
8. Barnes, D. & Holmes, Y. (1991). Radical behaviorism, stimulus equivalence and human cognition. The Psychological Record, 41, 19-30.
9. Barnes, D. & Keenan, M. (1993). A transfer of functions through derived arbitrary and non-arbitrary stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 61-81.
10. Barnes, D., McCullagh, P.D., & Keenan, M. (1990). Equivalence class formation in non-hearing impaired children and hearing impaired children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 19-30.
11. Barnes, D. & Roche, B. (1996). Relational frame theory and stimulus equivalence are fundamentally different: A reply to Saunders' commentary. The Psychological Record, 46, 489-508.
12. Barnes, D., Smeets, P.M., & Leader, G. (1996). Procedures for generating emergent matching performances: Implications for stimulus equivalence. In T.R. Zentall and P.M. Smeets (Eds.), Stimulus class formation: Advances in psychology (pp. 153-171). Holland: Elsevier.
13. Barnes-Holmes, D. & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2000). Explaining complex behavior: Two perspectives on the concept of generalized operant classes. The Psychological Record.
14. Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Cullinan, V. (2000). Relational frame theory and Skinner's Verbal Behavior: A possible synthesis. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 69-84.
15. Barnes-Holmes, D., Dymond, S., Roche, B., & Grey, I. (1999). Language and cognition. The Psychologist, 12, 500-504.
16. Barnes-Holmes, D., Hayes, S.C., Dymond, S., & O'Hora, D. (2001). Multiple stimulus relations and the transformation of stimulus functions. In S.C. Hayes, D., Barnes-Holmes & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 51-71). New York: Plenum.
17. Barnes-Holmes, D., Hayes, S.C., & Roche, B. (2001). The (not so) strange death of stimulus equivalence. European Journal of Behaviour Analysis, 1, 35-98.
18. Barnes-Holmes, D., Healy, O., & Hayes, S.C. (2000). Relational frame theory and the relational evaluation procedure: Approaching human language as derived relational responding. In J.C. Leslie & D.E. Blackman (Eds.) Experimental and applied analyses of human behavior (pp. 149-180). Reno, NV: Context Press.
19. Barnes-Holmes, D., Keane, J., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Smeets, P.M. (2000). A derived transfer of emotive functions as a means of establishing differential preferences for soft drinks. The Psychological Record, 50, 493-512.
20. Beasty, A. (1987). The role of language in the emergence of equivalence relations: A developmental study. Index to Theses with Abstracts, 39, 1149B.
21. Calcagno, S., Dube, W.V., DeFaria Galvao, O., & Sidman, M. (1994). Emergence of conditional discriminations after constructed-response matching-to-sample training. The Psychological Record, 44, 509-520.
22. Carr, D., Wilkinson, K.M., Blackman, D., & McIlvane, W.J. (2000). Equivalence classes in individuals with minimal verbal repertoires. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 101-114.
23. Carrigan, P.G. & Sidman, M. (1992). Conditional discrimination and equivalence relations: A theoretical analysis of control by negative stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 183-204.
24. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
25. Cook, R.G., Cavato, K.K., & Cavato, B.R. (1995). Same-different texture discrimination and concept learning by pigeons. The Psychological Record, 21, 253-261.
26. Cook, R.G. & Katz, J.S. (1999). Dynamic object perception by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 25, 194-210.
27. Cowley, B.J., Green, G., & Braunling-McMorrow, D. (1992). Using stimulus equivalence procedures to teach name-face matching to adults with brain injuries. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 461-475.
28. Cullinan, V., Barnes, D., Hampson, P.J., & Lyddy, F. (1994). A transfer of explicitly and nonexplicitly trained sequence responses through equivalence relations: An experimental demonstration and connectionist model. The Psychological Record, 44, 559-585.
29. Cullinan, V., Barnes, D., & Smeets, P.M. (1998). A precursor to the relational evaluation procedure: Analyzing stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 48, 121-145.
30. Cullinan, V., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Smeets, P.M. (2000). A precursor to the relational evaluation procedure: Analyzing stimulus equivalence II. The Psychological Record, 50, 467-492.
31. Cullinan, V., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Smeets, P.M. (2001). A precursor to the relational evaluation procedure: The search for the contextual cues that control equivalence responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76, 339-349.
32. D'Amato, M.R. & Colombo, M. (1985). Auditory matching-to-sample in monkeys (Cebus apella). Animal Learning and Behavior, 13, 375-382.
33. D'Amato, M.R. & Worsham, R.W. (1974). Retrieval cues and short-term memory in capuchin monkeys. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 86, 274-282.
34. deRose, J.T., deSouza, D.G., Rossito, A.L., & deRose, T.M.S. (1992). Stimulus equivalence and a generalization in reading after matching to sample by exclusion. In S.C. Hayes & L.J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 69-82). Reno NV: Contest Press.
35. Devany, J.M., Hayes, S.C., & Nelson, R.O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 243-257.
36. Dinsmoor, J.A. (1995). Stimulus control II. The Behavior Analyst, 18, 253-269.
37. Dixon, M.H. & Spradlin, J.E. (1976). Establishing stimulus equivalence among retarded adolescents. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 21, 144-164.
38. Dube, W.V., Green, G. & Serna, R.W. (1993). Auditory successive conditional discrimination and auditory stimulus equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 103-114.
39. Dube, W.V. McDonald, S.J., McIlvane, W.J., & Mackay, H.A. (1991). Constructed-response matchingto-sample and spelling instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 305-317.
40. Dube, W.V. & McIlvane, W.J. (1996). Some implications of a stimulus control topography analysis for emergent behavior and stimulus classes. In T. R. Zentall & P.M. Smeets (Eds.), Stimulus class formation in humans and animals: Advances in Psychology. NL: Elsevier.
41. Dugdale, N. & Lowe, C.F. (1990). Naming and stimulus equivalence. In D.E. Blackman & H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behavior analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies (pp. 115-138). Brighton, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Dugdale, N. & Lowe, C.F. (2000). Testing for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of language trained chimpanzees. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 73, 5-22.
43. Duncan, H.J., Beauchamp, G.K., & Yamazaki, H. (1992). Assessing odor generalization in the rat: A sensitive technique. Physiology and Behavior, 52, 617-620.
44. Dymond, S. & Barnes, D. (1994). A derived transfer of response functions through equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 251-267.
45. Dymond, S. & Barnes, D. (1995). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness, more than, and less than. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 163-184.
46. Dymond, S. & Barnes, D. (1996). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness and opposition. The Psychological Record, 46, 271-300.
47. Edwards, C.A., Jagielo, J.A., & Zentall, T.R. (1982). Acquired equivalence and distinctiveness in matching to sample by pigeons: Mediation by reinforcer-specific expectancies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 8, 244-259.
48. Eikeseth, S. & Smith, T. (1992). The development of functional and equivalence classes in highfunctioning autistic children: The role of naming. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 123-133.
49. Fetterman, J.G. & Killen, P.R. (1995). Categorical scaling of time: Implications for clock-counter models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 43-63.
50. Fields, L., Reeve, K.F., Varelas, A., Rosen, D., & Belanich, J. (1997). Equivalence class formation using stimulus-pairing and yes-no responding. The Psychological Record, 47, 661-686.
51. Gheusi, G., Goodall, G., & Dantzer, R. (1997). Individually distinctive odours represent individual conspecifics in rats. Animal Behaviour, 53, 925-944.
52. Green, G., Sigurdardottir, Z.G., & Saunders, R.R. (1991). The role of instructions in the transfer of ordinal functions through equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55, 287-304.
53. Hamm, J., Matheson, W.R., & Honig, W.K. (1997). Mental rotation in pigeons (Columba livia)? Journal of Comparative Psychology, 111, 76-81.
54. Hayes, L.J., Tilley, K.L., & Hayes, S.C. (1988). Extending equivalence class membership to gustatory stimuli. The Psychological Record, 38, 473-482.
55. Hayes, S.C. (1989). Nonhumans have not yet shown stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 385-392.
56. Hayes, S.C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L.J. Hayes & P.N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 19-40). Reno, NV: Context Press.
57. Hayes, S.C. (1994). Relational frame theory: A functional approach to verbal events. In S.C. Hayes, L.J. Hayes, M. Sato, & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 9-29). Reno, NV: Context Press.
58. Hayes, S.C. & Barnes, D. (1997). Analyzing derived stimulus relations requires more than the concept of stimulus class. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 235-244.
59. Hayes, S.C, Barnes-Holmes, D. & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Klewer/Plenum.
60. Hayes, S.C. & Hayes, L.J. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as the basis for rule-governance. In S.C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 153-190). New York: Plenum Press.
61. Hayes, S.C. & Hayes, L.J. (1992). Verbal relations and the evolution of behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1383-1395.
62. Healy, O., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Smeets, P.M. (2000). Derived relational responding as generalized operant behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 207-227.
63. Honig, W.K. & Matheson, W.R. (1995). Discrimination of relative numerosity as stimulus mixture by pigeons with comparable tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 348-363.
64. Horne, P.J. & Lowe, C.F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185-241.
65. Horne, P.J. & Lowe, C.F. (1997). Toward and theory of verbal behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 271-296.
66. Hull, C.L. (1934). The concept of the habit-family hierarchy and maze learning: Part 1. Psychological Review, 41, 33-52.
67. Jenkins, J.J. (1963). Mediated associations: paradigms and situations. In C.N. Cofer & B.S. Musgrave (Eds.), Verbal behavior and learning: Problems and processes (pp. 210-245). New York: McGraw-Hill.
68. Jenkins, J.J. & Palermo, D.S. (1964). Mediation processes and the acquisition of linguistic structure. In U. Bellugi & R. Brown (Eds.). The acquisition of language. Monographs of the society for research in child development, 29, (1, Serial No. 92), 141-169.
69. Jitsumori, M. & Yoshihara, M. (1997). Categorical discrimination of human facial expressions by pigeons: A test of the linear feature model. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 50B, 253-268.
70. Johnson-Laird, P.N. & Byrne, R.M.J. (1990). Deduction. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
71. Kastak, C.R. & Schusterman, R.J. (2001). Equivalence classification by California sea lions using class-specific reinforcers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76, 131-158.
72. Kastak, C.R. & Schusterman, R.J. (2002). Sea lions and equivalence: Expanding classes by exclusion. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 449-465.
73. Keane, M.T. (1988). Analogical problem solving. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.
74. Kohlenberg, B.S., Hayes, S.C., & Hayes, L.J. (1991). The transfer of specific and general consequential functions through simple and conditional equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 119-137.
75. Lane, S.D. & Critchfield, T.S. (1996). Verbal self-reports of emergent relations in a stimulus equivalence procedure. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 355-374.
76. Lazar, R.M. (1977). Extending sequence-class membership with matching-to-sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 381-392.
77. Lazar, R.M. & Kotlarchyk, B.J. (1986). Second-order control of sequence-class equivalences in children. Behavioural Processes, 13, 205-215.
78. Leader, G., Barnes, D., & Smeets, P.M., (1996). Establishing equivalence relations using a respondenttype training procedure. The Psychological Record, 46, 685-706.
79. Leader, G., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Smeets, P.M. (2000). Establishing equivalence relations using a respondent-type training procedure III. The Psychological Record, 50, 63-79.
80. Leader, G. & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2001). Establishing fraction-decimal equivalence using a respondenttype training procedure. The Psychological Record, 51, 151-166.
81. Lionello-DeNolf, K.M. & Urcuioli, P.J. (2002). Stimulus control topographies and tests of symmetry in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 467-495.
82. Lipkens, R. (1992). A behavior analysis of complex human functioning: Analogical reasoning. Unpublished doctoral thesis: University of Nevada, Reno.
83. Lipkens, R., Kop, P.F.M., & Matthijs, W. (1988). A test of symmetry and transitivity in the conditional discrimination performance of pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 395-409.
84. Lowe, C.F. & Beasty, A. (1987). Language and the emergence of equivalence relations: A developmental study. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 40, A42.
85. Luciano, M.C., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2001). Early development history and equivalence relations. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 1, 137-149.
86. Mackay, H.M. & Sidman, M. (1984). Teaching new behavior via equivalence relations. In P.H. Brooks, R. Sperber & C. McCauley (Eds.), Learning and cognition in the mentally retarded (pp. 493-513). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
87. Markham, M.R. & Dougher, M.J. (1993). Compound stimuli in emergent stimulus relations: Extending the scope of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 529-542.
88. Matos, M.A. & D'Oliveira, M.M.H. (1992). Equivalence relations in reading. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 83-94). Reno NV: Context Press.
89. McIlvane, W.J., Serna, R.W., Dube, W.V., & Stromer, R. (2000). Stimulus control topography coherence and stimulus equivalence: Reconciling test outcomes with theory. In J.C. Leslie & D.E. Blackman (Eds.), Experimental and applied analysis of human behavior (pp. 85-110). Reno, NV: Context Press.
90. McNamara, T.P. & Altarriba, J. (1988). Depth of spreading activation revisited: Semantic mediated priming occurs in lexical decisions. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 545-559.
91. McNamara, T.P. & Healy, A.F. (1988). Semantic, phonological, and mediated priming in reading and lexical decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 398-409.
92. Neiworth, J. & Wright, A.A. (1984). Monkeys (Macaca mulatta) learn category matching in a nonidentical same-different task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 429-435.
93. Neill, J.C. & Harrison, J.M. (1987). Auditory discrimination: The Konorski quality-location effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 81-95.
94. Newell, A. & Simon, H.A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
95. O'Hora, D., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., & Smeets, P.M. (in press). Derived relational networks and control by novel instructions: A possible model of generative verbal responding. The Psychological Record.
96. Osgood, C. E., (1953). Method and theory in experimental psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
97. Piaget, J. (1967). The child's conception of the world. Totawa, N. J.: Littlefield, Adams.
98. Pilgrim, C. & Galizio, M. (1990). Relations between baseline contingencies and equivalence probe performances. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 213-224.
99. Pilgrim, C. & Galizio, M. (1995). Reversal of baseline relations and stimulus equivalence: I adults. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 63, 225-238.
100. Pilgrim, C. & Galizio, M. (1996). Stimulus equivalence: A class of correlations, or a correlations of classes? In T.R. Zentall & P.M. Smeets (Eds), Stimulus class formation in humans and animals (pp. 173-195). Holland: Elsevier.
101. Ray, B.A. & Sidman, M. (1970). Reinforcement schedules and stimulus control. In W.N. Schoenfeld (Ed.), The theory of reinforcement schedules (pp. 187-214). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
102. Reed, P. & Pizzimenti, L. (1995). Lack of consistent individual differences in rats on tasks that require response inhibition. Animal Learning and Behavior, 23, 454-460.
103. Reese, H.W. (1968). The perception of stimulus relations: Discrimination learning and transposition. San Deigo, CA: Academic Press.
104. Roche, B. & Barnes, D. (1996). Arbitrarily applicable relational responding and sexual categorization: A critical test of the derived difference relation. The Psychological Record, 46, 451-475.
105. Roche, B. & Barnes, D. (1998). The experimental analysis of human sexual arousal: Some recent developments. The Behavior Analyst, 21, 37-52.
106. Roche, B. & Barnes, D., & Smeets, P.M. (1997). Incongruous stimulus pairing contingencies and conditional discrimination training: Effects on relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 143-160.
107. Roche, B., Barnes-Holmes, D., Smeets, P.M., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & McGeedy, S. (2000). Contextual control over the derived transformation of discriminative and sexual arousal functions. The Psychological Record, 50, 267-292.
108. Saunders, K.J., Saunders, R.R., Kirby, K.C., & Spradlin, J.E. (1988). The merger and development of equivalence classes by unreinforced conditional selection of comparison stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 145-162.
109. Saunders, K.J., Saunders, R.R., Williams, D.C., & Spradlin, J.E. (1993). An interaction of instructions and training design on stimulus class formation: Extending the analysis of equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 725-744.
110. Saunders, K.J., Saunders, R.R., Kirby, K.C., & Spradlin, J.E. (1988). The merger and development of equivalence classes by unreinforced conditional selection of comparison stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 145-162.
111. Saunders, R.R., Drake, K.M., & Spradlin, J.E. (1999). Equivalence class establishment, expansion, and modification in preschool children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 71, 195-214.
112. Schenk, J.J. (1995). Complex stimuli in nonreinforced simple discrimination tasks: Emergent simple and conditional discriminations. The Psychological Record, 45, 477-494.
113. Schusterman, R.J. & Kastak, D. (1993). A California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) is capable of forming equivalence relations. The Psychological Record, 43, 823-839.
114. Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5-13.
115. Sidman, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 213-245). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum.
116. Sidman, M. (1990). Equivalence relations: Where do they come from? In D.E. Blackman & H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behaviour analysis in theory and practice. U.K.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
117. Sidman, S. (1992). Equivalence relations: Some basic considerations. In S. C. & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 15-27). Reno, NV: Context Press.
118. Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative.
119. Sidman, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 127-146.
120. Sidman, M., Kirk., & Willson-Morris, M. (1985). Six-member stimulus classes generated by conditional discrimination procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 21-42.
121. Sidman, M., Rauzin, R., Lazar, R., Cunningham, S., Tailby, W., & Carrigan, P. (1982). A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children. Journ of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 23-44.
122. Sidman, M. & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching-to-sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5-22.
123. Sigurdardottir, Z.G., Green, G., & Saunders, R.R. (1990). Equivalence classes generated by sequence training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 47-64.
124. Skinner, B.F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
125. Skinner, B.F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
126. Smeets, P.M., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Akpinar, D. & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2003). Reversal of equivalence relations. The Psychological Record, 53, 91-120.
127. Smeets, P.M., Leader, G., & Barnes, D. (1997). Establishing stimulus classes with adults and children using a respondent training procedure: A follow-up study. The Psychological Record, 47, 285-308.
128. Smeets, P.M., Schenk, J.J., & Barnes, D. (1994). Establishing arbitrary stimulus classes via identity matching training and nonreinforced matching with complex stimuli. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48B, 311-328.
129. Smeets, P.M. & Striefel, S. (1994). Matching to complex stimuli under non-reinforced conditions: Errorless transfer from identity to arbitrary matching tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47B, 39-62.
130. Spradlin, J.E. & Dixon, M. (1976). Establishing a conditional discrimination withoutn direct training: Stimulus classes and labels. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 80, 555-561.
131. Staunton, S., Barnes-Holmes, D., Whelan, R., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2003). Priming and event related potentials (ERPs) as measures of derived relational responding. Paper presented at the Annual Convention for the Association for Behavior Analysis, San Francisco, USA.
132. Steele, D. & Hayes, S.C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519-555.
133. Sternberg, R.J. (1985). Beyond I.Q.: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
134. Stewart, I., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (in press). A functional-analytic model of analogy using the relational evaluation procedure. The Psychological Record.
135. Stromer, R.R. (1991). Stimulus equivalence: Implications for teaching. In W. Ishaq (Ed.), Human behavior in today's world (pp. 109-122). New York: Praeger.
136. Stromer, R.R. & Mackay, H.A. (1993). Human sequential behavior: Relations among stimuli, class formation, and derived sequences. The Psychological Record, 43, 107-131.
137. Stromer, R., McIlvane, W.J., & Serna, R.W. (1993). Complex stimulus control and equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 584-598.
138. Terrace, H.S. (1983). Simultaneous chaining. In M.L. Commons, R.J. Herrnstein, & A.R. Wagner (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior, Vol 4: Discrimination processes. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
139. Terrace, H.S., Straub, R., Bever, T.G. & Seidenberg, M. (1977). Representation of a sequence by pigeons. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 10, 269.
140. Tierney, K.J., De Largy, P., & Bracken, M. (1995). Formation of an equivalence class incorporating haptic stimuli. The Psychological Record, 45, 431-438.
141. Visdómine, J.C. & Luciano, M.C. (2002). Formación de locus de control por transferencia de funciones. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 2, 57-73.
142. Warner, M.D. & Rilling, M.E. (1997). Pigeons extract redundant, multiple features and attend to multiple contours when recognizing line drawings. The Psychological Record, 47, 123-144.
143. Wasserman, E.A. (1976). Successive mathing-to-sample in the pigeon: Variations on a theme by Kornorski. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 8, 278-282.
144. Wasserman, E.A., Grosch, J., & Nevin, J.A. (1982). Effects of signaled retention intervals on pigeon short-term memory. Animal Learning and Behavior, 10, 330-338.
145. Wasserman, E.A., Hugart, J.A., & Kirkpatrick-Steger, K. (1995). Pigeons show same-different conceptualization after training with complex visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 248-252.
146. Watt, A.W., Keenan, M., Barnes, D., & Cairns, E. (1991). Social categorization and stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 41, 33-50.
147. Wearden, J.H. (1985). Categorical scaling of stimulus duration by humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 318-330.
148. Williams, D.C., Saunders, K.J., Saunders, R.R., & Spradlin, J.E. (1995). Unreinforced conditional selection of within three-choice conditional discriminations. The Psychological Record, 45, 613-627.
149. Wilson, K.G. & Hayes, S.C. (1996). Resurgence of derived stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 66, 267-281.
150. Wright, A.A., Santiago, H.C., & Sands, S.F. (1984). Monkey memory: Same/different concept learning, serial probe acquisition, and probe delay effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 513-529.
151. Wright, A.A., Shyan, M.R., & Jitsumori, M. (1990). Auditory same/different concept learning by monkeys. Animal Learning and Behavior, 18, 287-294.
152. Wulfert, E., Dougher, M.J., & Greenway, D.E. (1991). Protocol analysis of the correspondence of verbal behavior and equivalence class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 489-504.
153. Wulfert, E. & Hayes, S. C. (1988). Transfer of a conditional ordering response through conditional equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 125-144.