Establishing fraction-decimal equivalence using a respondent-type training procedure

Psychological Record

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 151-165

  Leader, Geraldine ^a   Barnes Holmes, Dermot ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035578601     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03395391     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. BARNES, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91-124.
2. BARNES, D., & KEENAN, M. (1993). A transfer of functions through derived arbitary and non-arbitary stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, 59, 61-81.
3. BAROODY, A. J., & HUME, J. (1991). Meaningful mathematics instruction: The case of fractions. Remedial and Special Education, 12, 54-68.
4. BELL, A. (1993). Principles for the design of teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24, 5-34.
5. FIELDS, L., & VERHAVE, T. (1987).The structure of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 317-332.
6. HAYES, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues of verbal behavior (pp. 19-40). Reno, NV: Context Press.
7. HAYES, S. C., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & ROCHE, B. (in press). A post-Skinnerian analysis of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum.
8. LEADER, G., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (in press). Matching-to-sample and respondent-type training as methods for producing equivalence relations: Isolating the critical variable. The Psychological Record.
9. LEADER, G., BARNES, D., & SMEETS, P. M. (1996). Establishing equivalence relations using a respondent-type training procedure. The Psychological Record, 46, 685-706.
10. LYNCH, D. C., & CUVO, A. J. (1991 ). Stimulus equivalence instructions of fraction-decimal relations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 115-126.
11. MACE, F. C. (1994). Basic research needed for stimulating the development of behavioral technologies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 61, 529-550.
12. MACKAY, H. A. (1985). Stimulus equivalence in rudimentary reading and spelling. Analysis and Intervention in Development Disabilities, 5, 373-387.
13. MACKAY, H. A., & SIDMAN, M. (1984). Teaching new behaviours via equivalence relations. In P. H. Brooks, R. Sperber, & C. MacCauley (Eds.), Learning and cognition in the mentally retarded (pp. 493-513). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. SIDMAN, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalence. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5-13.
15. SIDMAN, M. (1980). A note on the measurement of conditional discrimination. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 33, 285-289.
16. SIDMAN, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent and verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M. A. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and interaction of behavioral units (pp. 213-245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. SIDMAN, M. (1987). Two choices are not enough. Behavior Analysis, 22, 11-18.
18. SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations: A research story. Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative.
19. SIDMAN, M., & CRESSON, O., Jr. (1973). Reading and crossmodal transfer of stimulus equivalence in severe retardation. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 513-523
20. SMEETS, P. M., LEADER, G., & BARNES, D. (1997). Establishing stimulus classes in adults and children using a respondent-type training procedure: A follow-up study. The Psychological Record, 47, 285-308.
21. STROMER, R., MACKAY, H. A., & STODDARD, L. T. (1992). Classroom applications of stimulus equivalence technology. Journal of Behavioral Education, 2, 225-256.