Establishing equivalence relations using a respondent-type training procedure

Psychological Record

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 685-706

  Leader, Geraldine ^b   Barnes, Dermot ^a   Smeets, Paul M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030496210     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03395192     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. BARNES, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91-124.
2. BARNES, D. (1996). Naming as a technical term: Sacrificing behavior analysis at the altar of popularity (Commentary). Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 264-267.
3. BARNES, D., BROWNE, M., SMEETS, P. M., & ROCHE, B. (1995). A transfer of functions and a conditional transfer of functions through equivalence relations in three-to six-year-old children. The Psychological Record. 45, 405-430.
4. BARNES, D., & HOLMES, Y. (1991). Radical behaviorism, stimulus equivalence, and human cognition. The Psychological Record, 41, 19-31.
5. BARNES, D., & KEENAN, M. (1993). A transfer of functions through derived arbitrary and non-arbitrary stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 61-81.
6. BARNES, D., MCCULLAGH, P. D., & KEENAN, M. (1990). Equivalence class formation in non-hearing impaired children and hearing impaired children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 19-30.
7. BARNES, D., & ROCHE, B. (1996). Relational frame theory and stimulus equivalence are fundamentally different: A reply to Saunders. The Psychological Record, 46, 489-508.
8. CULLINAN, V. A., BARNES, D., HAMPSON, P. J., & LYDDY, F. (1994). A transfer of explicitly and nonexplicitly trained sequence responses through equivalence relations: An experimental demonstration and connectionist model. The Psychological Record, 44, 559-585.
9. DEROSE, J. C., MCILVANE, W. J DUBE, W. V., GALPIN, V. C., & STODDARD, L. T. (1988). Emergent simple discrimination established by indirect relation to differential consequences. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 1-20.
10. DEVANY, J. M., HAYES, S. C., & NELSON, R. O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 243-257.
11. DYMOND, S., & BARNES, D. (1994). A transfer of self-discrimination response functions through equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 251-267.
12. EIKESETH, S., & SMITH, T. (1992). The development of functional and equivalence classes in high functioning autistic children: The role of naming. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 123-133.
13. FIELDS, L., ADAMS, B. J., NEWMAN, S., & VERHAVE, T. (1992). Interactions among emergent relations during equivalence class formation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45B, 125-138.
14. FIELDS, L., & VERHAVE, T. (1987). The structure of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 317-332.
15. GREEN, G., SIGURDARDOTTIR, Z. G., & SAUNDERS, R. R. (1991). The role of instructions in the transfer of ordinal functions through equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55, 287-304.
16. GREEN, G., STROMER, R., & MACKAY, H. A. (1993). Relational learning in stimulus sequences. The Psychological Record, 43, 599-616.
17. HAYES, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 19-40). Reno, NV: Context Press.
18. HAYES, S. C. (1994). Relational frame theory: A functional approach to verbal events. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, M. Sato, & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 9-30). Reno, NV: Context Press.
19. HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as the basis for rule-governance. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule governed behavior: Cognition contingencies and instructional control (pp. 153-190). New York: Plenum Press.
20. HEGARTY, N., BARNES, D., & SMEETS, P. M. (1995). Relating equivalence relations to equivalence relations and relating nonequivalence relations to nonequivalence relations. Paper presented during the symposium "Emerging themes in stimulus equivalence" at the Annual Conference of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Group, London, England, U.K.
21. MARKHAM, M. R., & DOUGHER, M. J. (1993). Compound stimuli in emergent stimulus relations: Extending the scope of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 529-542.
22. SAUNDERS, K. J., SAUNDERS, R. R., WILLIAMS, D. C., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1993). An interaction of instructions and training design on stimulus class formation: Extending the analysis of equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 725-744.
23. SAUNDERS, R. R., SAUNDERS, K. J., KIRBY, K. C., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1988). The merger and development of equivalence classes by unreinforced conditional selection of comparison stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 145-162.
24. SIDMAN, M. (1971). Reading and auditory - visual equivalences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5-13.
25. SIDMAN, M. (1990). Equivalence relations: Where do they come from? In D. E. Blackman & H. L. Lejeune (Eds.), Behavior analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies (pp. 93-114). Hove, England: Erlbaum.
26. SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston, MA: Author's Cooperative.