A precursor to the relational evaluation procedure: Analyzing stimulus equivalence II

Psychological Record

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 467-492

  Cullinan, Veronica A ^a   Barnes Holmes, Dermot ^b   Smeets, Paul M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^c National University of Ireland ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034376489     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03395366     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. BARNES, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91-124.
2. BARNES, D., BROWNE, M., SMEETS, P. M., & ROCHE, B. (1995). A transfer of functions and a conditional transfer of functions through equivalence relations in three- to six-year-old children. The Psychological Record, 45, 405-430.
3. BARNES, D., & HOLMES, Y. (1991). Radical behaviorism, stimulus equivalence and human cognition. The Psychological Record, 41, 19-30.
4. BARNES, D., & KEENAN, M. (1993). A transfer of functions through derived arbitrary and non-arbitrary stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 61-81.
5. BARNES, D., & ROCHE, B. (1996). Relational frame theory and stimulus equivalence are fundamentally different: A reply to Saunders' commentary. The Psychological Record, 46, 489-507.
6. BARNES, D., SMEETS, P. M., & LEADER, G. (1996). Procedures for generating emergent matching performances: Implications for stimulus equivalence. In T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets (Eds.), Stimulus class formation: Advances in psychology (pp. 153-171). Holland: Elsevier.
7. BARNES-HOLMES, D., & BARNES-HOLMES, Y. (2000). Explaining complex behavior: Two perspectives on the concept of generalized operant classes. The Psychological Record, 50, 251-265.
8. BARNES-HOLMES, D., DYMOND, S., ROCHE, B., & GREY, I. (1999). Behaviour analysis: A new agenda for language and cognition. The Psychologist, 12, 500-504.
9. BARNES-HOLMES, D., HAYES, S. C., HEGARTY, N., & DYMOND, S. (in press). Multiple stimulus relations, the transformations of stimulus functions and the limits of the class concept. In S. C. Hayes & D. Barnes-Holmes (Eds.), Relational frame theory: Creating an alternative behavioral agenda in language and cognition. Reno, NV: Context Press.
10. BARNES-HOLMES, D., HEALY, O., & HAYES, S. C. (in press). Relational frame theory and the relational evaluation procedure: Approaching human language as derived relational responding. In J. C. Leslie & D. E. Blackman (Eds.), Experimental and applied analyses of human behavior. Reno, NV: Context Press.
11. BARNES-HOLMES, D., KEANE, J., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., & SMEETS, P. M. (2000). A derived transfer of emotive functions as a means of establishing differential preferences for soft drinks. The Psychological Record, 50, 493-511.
12. CULLINAN, V. A., BARNES, D., HAMPSON, P. J., & LYDDY, F. (1994). A transfer of explicitly and nonexplicitly trained sequence responses through equivalence relations: An experimental demonstration and connectionist model. The Psychological Record, 44, 559-585.
13. CULLINAN, V. A., BARNES, D., & SMEETS, P. M. (1998). A precursor to the relational evaluation procedure: Analyzing stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 48, 121-145.
14. D'AMATO, M. R., & COLOMBO, M. (1985). Auditory matching-to-sample in monkeys (Cebus apella). Animal Learning and Behavior, 13, 375-382.
15. DUBE, W. V., & MCILVANE, W. J. (1996). Some implications of a stimulus control topography analysis for emergent behavior and stimulus classes. In T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets (Eds.), Stimulus class formation in humans and animals: Advances in psychology. NL: Elsevier.
16. DYMOND, S., & BARNES, D. (1994). A transfer of self-discrimination response functions through equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 251-267.
17. FIELDS, L., ADAMS, B. J., NEWMAN, S., & VERHAVE, T. (1992). Interactions among emergent relations during equivalence class formation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45B, 125-138.
18. HAYES, S. C., & BARNES, D., (1997). Analyzing derived stimulus relations requires more than the concept of stimulus class. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 235-244.
19. HAYES, S. C., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (in press). Relational frame theory: Creating an alternative behavioral agenda in language and cognition. Reno, NV: Context Press.
20. LEADER, G., BARNES, D., & SMEETS, P. M., (1996). Establishing equivalence relations using a respondent-type training procedure. The Psychological Record, 46, 685-706.
21. PILGRIM, C., & GALIZIO, M. (1990). Relations between baseline contingencies and equivalence probe performances. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 213-224.
22. PILGRIM, C., & GALIZIO, M. (1995). Reversal of baseline relations and stimulus equivalence: I. Adults. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 63, 225-238.
23. ROCHE, B., BARNES, D,. & SMEETS, P. M. (1997). Incogruous stimulus paring and conditional discrimination training: Effects on rational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 143-160.
24. SAUNDERS, R. R., DRAKE, K. M., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1999). Equivalence class establishment, expansion, and modification in preschool children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 71, 195-214.
25. SCHENK, J. J. (1995). Complex stimuli in nonreinforced simple discrimination tasks: Emergent simple and conditional discriminations. The Psychological Record, 45, 477-494.
26. SIDMAN, M. (1990). Equivalence relations: Where do they come from? In D. E. Blackman & H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behaviour analysis in theory and practice. U.K.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27. SMEETS, P. M., LEADER, G., & BARNES, D. (1997). Establishing stimulus classes with adults and children using a respondent training procedure: A follow-up study. The Psychological Record, 47, 285-308.
28. SMEETS, P. M., SCHENK, J. J., & BARNES, D. (1994). Establishing arbitrary stimulus classes via identity matching training and nonreinforced matching with complex stimuli. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48B, 311-328.
29. WULFERT, E., DOUGHER, M. J., & GREENWAY, D. E. (1991). Protocol analysis of the correspondence of verbal behavior and equivalence class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 489-504.