Early verbal developmental history and equivalence relations;Historia de desarrollo verbal temprano y relaciones de equivalencia

International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 137-149

  Luciano, M Carmen ^a   Barnes Holmes, Yvonne ^b   Barnes Holmes, Dermot ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALMERÍA   (Spain)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 26444576905     PISSN: 15777057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Augustson, K.G., & Dougher, M.J. (1992). Teaching conditional discrimination to young children. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 9, 21-24.
2. Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D. & Cullinan, V. (2001). Education. In Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D. & Roche, B. (Eds.) Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition, (pp. 132-142). New York: Plenum.
3. Barnes-Holmes, Y., Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (in press). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. In H. Reese (Ed). Advances in child development. Vol. 28. New York: Academic Press.
4. Boolens, H. (1994). A traditional account of stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 44, 587-605.
5. Carr, D., Wilkinson, M., Blackman, D. & McIlvane, W.J. (2000). Equivalence classes in individuals with minimal verbal repertoires. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 101-114.
6. Clayton, M.C., & Hayes, L.J. (1999). Conceptual differences in the analysis of stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 49, 145-161.
7. Devany, J.M., Hayes, S.C., & Nelson, R.O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 243-257.
8. Dymond, S., & Barnes, D. (1995). A transformation of self-discrimination responses functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness, more than, and less than. Journal of the Experimental Analysis orf Behavior, 64, 163-184.
9. Dymond, S., & Barnes, D. (1996). A transformation orf self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness and opposition. The Psychological Record, 46, 271-300.
10. Dugdale, N. & Lowe, F. (2000). Testing for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of languagetrained chimpanzees. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 73, 5-22.
11. Eikeseth, S., & Smith, T. (1992). The development of functional and equivalence classes in hightfunctioning autistic children: The role of naming. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 123-133.
12. Epstein, R. (1985). The spontaneous interconnection of three repertoires. The Psychological Record, 35, 131-141.
13. Epstein, R., Lanza, R.P., & Skinner, B.F. (1981). "Self-awareness" in the pigeon. Science, 212, 695-696.
14. Gómez, S., Barnes-Holmes. D, & Luciano, M.C. (2001). Generalized break equivalence I. The Psychological Record, 51, 131-150.
15. Green, G. (1990). Difference in development of visual and auditory-visual equivalence relations. American Journal on Mental Retardations, 95, 260-270.
16. Guess, D., Sailor, W., & Baer, D.M. (1976). Functional speech and language training for the severely handicapped. Parts I, II & III. Lawrence, KS: H.H. Enterprises.
17. Hayes, L.J. (1992). Equivalence as a process. En S.C. Hayes & L.J. Hayes, (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 97-108). Reno, NV: Context Press.
18. Hayes, L.J. (1996). Listening with understanding and speaking with meaning. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 282-283.
19. Hayes, S.C. (1989). Nonhumans have not yet shown stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 385-392.
20. Hayes, S.C. & Hayes, L. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as a basis for rule-governance. In S.C. Hayes (Ed.) Rule governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pág. 153-190). New York: Plenum Press.
21. Hayes, S.C., & Hayes, L.J. (1992) Verbal relations, cognition, and the evolution of behavior analysis.American Psychologist, 47, 1383-1395.
22. Hayes, S.C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 19-40). Reno,NV: Context Press.
23. Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D. & Roche, B. (Eds.) (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum.
24. Hayes, S.C., Gifford, E.V., y Wilson, K.G. (1996). Stimulus Classes and Stimulus Relations: Arbitrarily Applicable Relational Responding as an Operant. En T.R. Zentall & P.M. Smeets (Editors). Stimulus Class Formation in Humans and Animals (pp. 279-299). North Holland: Elsevier Science B.V.
25. Horne, P.J., & Lowe, F. (1996). On the origins of naming and others symbolyc behavior. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185-241.
26. Kent, L. (1974). Language acquisition program for the retarded or multiply impaired. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
27. Kozloff, M. (1974). Education of children with learning and behavior problems. New York: John Wiley and Sons. (El aprendizaje y la conducta en la infancia. Barcelona: Fontanella).
28. Leader, G., Barnes, D., & Smeets, P.M. (1996). Establishing equivalence relations using a respondenttype training procedure. The Psychological Record, 46, 685-706.
29. Lipkens, R., Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1993). Longitudinal study of the development of derived relations in an infant. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 201-239.
30. Lovaas, I.O. (1990). Enseñanza de niños con trastornos de desarrollo. Barcelona: Martínez Roca.
31. Luciano, M.D. (1991). Problem Solving Behavior: An experimental example. Psicothema, 3, 297-317.
32. Luciano, M.C. (1993). La conducta verbal a la luz de recientes investigaciones. Su papel sobre otras conductas verbales y no verbales. Psicothema, 5, 351-374.
33. Luciano, M.C. (1996). Intervención psicológica en Retraso en Desarrollo: Una perspectiva funcional. En Luciano, M.C. (Ed), Manual de Psicología Clínica (pág. 465-526).Valencia: Promolibro.
34. Luciano, M.C., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2001). Establishing reports of Saying and Doing and Discriminations of Say-Do Relations. Manuscript under review.
35. Luciano, M.C., Gómez-Becerra, I. & Rodriguez, M. (2001). Equivalence in early development. Manuscript under review.
36. Markham, M.R. y Dougher, M.J. (1993). Compound stimuli in emergent stimulus relations: Extending the scope of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 529-542.
37. McIlvaine, W.J., Serna, R.W., Duge, W.V., & Stromer, R. (2000). Stimulus control topography coherence and stimulus equivalence: Reconciling test outcomes with theory. In J. Leslie & D. E. Blackman (Eds). Issues in experimental and applied analyses of human behavior (pp. 85-110). Reno, NV. Context Press.
38. McIntire, W.J., Cleary, J., & Thompson, T. (1987). Conditional relations by monkeys: Reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 47, 279-285.
39. Pilgrim, C. & Galizio, M. (2000). Stimulus Equivalence and Units of Analysis. In J. Leslie & D. E. Blackman (Eds). Issues in experimental and applied analyses of human behavior (pp. 111-126). Reno, NV. Context Press.
40. Rehfeldt, R.A., & Hayes, L.J. (1998). The operant-respondent distinction revisited: Toward an understanding of stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 48, 187-210.
41. Schusterman, R. J., & Kastak, D. (1993). A California sea lion is capable of forming equivalence relations. The Psychological Record, 43, 823-839.
42. Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5-13.
43. Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.
44. Sidman, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 127-146.
45. Steele, D. & Hayes, S.C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519-555.
46. Strommer, R., McIlvane, W.J., y Serna, R.W. (1993). Complex stimulus control and equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 585-598.
47. Valero, L. (1992). La emergencia de nuevas conductas a través de relaciones de equivalencia. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad de Granada.
48. Yamamoto, J. & Asano, T. (1995) Stimulus equivalence in a chimpanzee. The Psychological Record, 45, 3-21.
49. Ybarra, J.L. Luciano, M.C., y Gómez, S. (En prensa). Relaciones de equivalencia: Competitividad entre la historia pre-experimental y experimental. Revista Internacional de Psicología Clínica y de la Salud.
50. Zentall, T.R. & Smeets, P. M. (1996). Stimulus class formation in humans and animals. Amsterdam: Elsevier.