Explaining complex behavior: Two perspectives on the concept of generalized operant classes

Psychological Record

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 251-265

  Barnes Holmes, Dermot ^a   Barnes Holmes, Yvonne ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034384153     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03395355     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. BAER, D. M., PETERSON, R. F., & SHERMAN, J. A. (1967). The development of imitation by reinforcing behavioral similarity to a model. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10, 405-416.
2. BARNES, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91-124.
3. BARNES, D. (1996). Naming as a technical term: Sacrificing behavior analysis at the altar of popularity. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 264-267.
4. BARNES, D., & HAMPSON, P. J. (1993). Stimulus equivalence and connectionism: Implications for behavior analysis and cognitive science. The Psychological Record, 43, 617-638.
5. BARNES, D., & HAMPSON, P. J. (1997). Connectionist models of arbitrarily applicable relational responding: A possible role for the hippocampal system. In J. W. Donahoe & V. P. Dorsel (Eds.), Neural network interpretations of cognition: Biobehavioral foundations (pp. 496-521). Netherlands: Elsevier.
6. BARNES, D., HEALY, O., & HAYES, S. C. (in press). Relational frame theory and the relational evaluation procedure: Approaching human language as derived relational responding. In J. C. Leslie & D. E. Blackman (Eds.), Experimental and applied analyses of human behavior. Reno, NV: Context Press.
7. BARNES, D., & HOLMES, Y. (1991). Radical behaviorism, stimulus equivalence, and human cognition. The Psychological Record, 41, 19-31.
8. BARNES, D., & ROCHE, B. (1996). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory are fundamentally different: A reply to Saunders' commentary. The Psychological Record, 46, 489-507.
9. BOELENS, H. (1994). A traditional account of stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 44, 587-605.
10. CATANIA, A. C. (1996). On the origins of behavior structure. In T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets (Eds.), Stimulus class formation in humans and animals (pp. 3-12). North Holland: Elsevier Science.
11. CATANIA, A. C. (1998). Learning (4th ed.). New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.
12. DYMOND, S., & BARNES, D. (1995). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness, more than, and less than. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 163-184.
13. GEWIRTZ, J. L., & STENGLE, K. G. (1968). Learning of generalized imitation as the basis for identification. Psychological Review, 5, 374-397.
14. HAYES, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 19-40). Reno, NV: Context Press.
15. HAYES, S. C. (1994) Relational frame theory: A functional approach to verbal events. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, M. Sato, & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 9-30). Reno, NV: Context Press.
16. HAYES, S. C., GIFFORD, E. V., & WILSON, K. (1996). Stimulus classes and stimulus relations: Arbitrarily applicable relational responding as an operant. In T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets (Eds.), Stimulus class formation in humans and animals (pp. 279-299). North Holland: Elsevier Science.
17. HAYES, S. C. & HAYES, L. J. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as the basis for rule-governance. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 153-190). New York: Plenum Press.
18. HAYES, S. C., & WILSON, K. (1996). Criticisms of relational frame theory: Implications for derived stimulus relations. The Psychological Record, 46, 221-236.
19. HEALY, O., BARNES, D., & SMEETS, P. M. (1998). Derived relational responding as an operant: The effects of between-session feedback. The Psychological Record, 48, 511-536.
20. HORNE, P. J., & LOWE, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185-241.
21. LIPKENS, R., HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1993). Longitudinal study of the development of derived stimulus relations in an infant. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 201-239 .
22. LOWE, C. F., amp; HORNE, P. (1996). Reflections on naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 315-340.
23. LOWENKRON, B. (1998). Some logical functions of joint control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 69, 327-354 .
24. MCILVANE, W. J., DUBE, W. V., & CALLAHAN, T. D. (1995). Attention: A behavior analytic perspective. In G. R. Lyon & N. A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Attention, memory, and executive function (pp. 97-117). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
25. MCILVANE, W. J., DUBE, W. V., KLEDARAS, J. B., IENNACO, F. M., & STODDARD, L. T. (1990). Teaching relational discrimination to individuals with mental retardation: Some problems and possible solutions. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 95, 283-296.
26. NEURINGER, A. (1986). Can people behave randomly?: The role of feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 62-75.
27. POULSON, C. L., KYMISSIS, E., REEVE, K. F., ANDREATOS, M., & REEVE, L. (1991). Generalized vocal imitation in infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 267-279.
28. PRYOR, K. W., HAAG, R., & O'REILLY, J. (1969). The creative porpoise: Training for novel behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 653-661.
29. ROCHE, B., BARNES, D., & SMEETS, P. M. (1997). Incongruous stimulus pairing and conditional discrimination training: Effects on relational responding, Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 143-160.
30. SIDMAN, M. (1990). Equivalence relations: Where do they come from? In D. E. Blackman & H. Lejune (Eds.), Behaviour analysis in theory and in practice: Contributions and controversies (pp. 93-114). Hove, England: Erlbaum.
31. SIDMAN, M. (1992). Equivalence relations: Some basic considerations. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 15-27). Reno, NV: Context Press.
32. SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative, Inc., Publishers.
33. SKINNER, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
34. STEELE, D., & HAYES, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519-555 .