A precursor to the relational evaluation procedure: Analyzing stimulus equivalence

Psychological Record

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 121-145

  Cullinan, Veronica A ^b   Barnes, Dermot ^a   Smeets, Paul M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032393882     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03395262     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. CULLINAN, V. A., BARNES, D., HAMPSON, P. J., & LYDDY, F. (1994). A transfer of explicitly and nonexplicitly trained sequence responses through equivalence relations: An experimental demonstration and connectionist model. The Psychological Record, 44, 559-585.
2. D'AMATO, M. R., & COLOMBO, M. (1985). Auditory matching-to-sample in monkeys (Cebus apella). Animal Learning and Behavior, 13, 375-382.
3. DUBE, W. V., & MCILVANE, W. J. (1996). Some implications of a stimulus control topography analysis for emergent behavior and stimulus classes. In T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets (Eds.), Stimulus class formation in humans and animals (pp. 197-218). Amsterdam, Holland: Elsevier.
4. DYMOND, S., & BARNES, D. (1994). A transfer of self-discrimination response functions through equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 251-267.
5. FIELDS, L., ADAMS, B. J., NEWMAN, S., & VERHAVE, T. (1992). Interactions among emergent relations during equivalence class formation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45B, 125-138.
6. HAYES, S. C., & BARNES, D. (1997). Analyzing derived stimulus relations requires more than the concept of stimulus class. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 235-244.
7. LEADER, G., BARNES, D., & SMEETS, P. M. (1996). Establishing equivalence relations using a respondent-type training procedure. The Psychological Record, 46, 685-706.
8. MARKHAM, M. R., & DOUGHER, M. J. (1993). Compound stimuli in emergent stimulus relations: Extending the scope of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 529-542.
9. REEEVE, K. F., FIELDS, L., VARELAS, A., ROSEN, D., BELANICH, J., & HOBBIE, S. (1996) Equivalence class formation using a stimulus-pairing/yes-no procedure. Paper presented during the symposium "Generalization of emergent relations and equivalence class formation: Different perspectives," at the Association for Behavior Analysis, 22nd Annual Convention, San Francisco, California, USA.
10. SAUNDERS, R. R., WACHTER, J., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1988). Establishing auditory stimulus control over an eight-member equivalence class via conditional discrimination procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 95-115.
11. SAUNDERS, K. J., SAUNDERS, R. R., WILLIAMS, D. C., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1993). An interaction of instructions and training design on stimulus class formation: Extending the analysis of equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 725-744.
12. SCHENK, J. J. (1993). Emergent conditional discrimination in children: Matching to compound stimuli. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46B (4), 345-365.
13. SMEETS, P. M., SCHENK, J. J., & BARNES, D. (1995). Establishing arbitrary stimulus classes via identity matching training and nonreinforced matching with complex stimuli. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48B, 311-328.
14. SMEETS, P. M., & STRIEFEL, S. (1994). Matching to complex stimuli under non-reinforced conditions: Errorless transfer from identity to arbitrary matching tasks. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47B (1), 39-62.
15. STROMER, R., MCILVANE, W. J., & SERNA, R. W. (1993). Complex stimulus control and equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 585-598.