Spindle Checkpoint Component Mad2 Contributes to Biorientation of Homologous Chromosomes

Current Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 22, 2003, Pages 1979-1984

  Shonn, Marion A ^a,b   Murray, Amara L ^a   Murray, Andrew W ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUNGI; SACCHAROMYCES;

EID: 0242540358     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2003.10.057     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Shonn, M.A., McCarroll, R., and Murray, A.W. (2000). Requirement of the spindle checkpoint for proper chromosome segregation in budding yeast meiosis. Science 289, 300-303.
2. Li, R., and Murray, A.W. (1991). Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 66, 519-531.
3. Hoyt, M.A., Trotis, L., and Roberts, B.T. (1991). S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell 66, 507-517.
4. Millband, D.N., Campbell, L., and Hardwick, K.G. (2002). The awesome power of multiple model systems: interpreting the complex nature of spindle checkpoint signaling. Trends Cell Biol. 12, 205-209.
5. Hardwick, K.G., Li, R., Mistrot, C., Chen, R.H., Dann, P., Rudner, A., and Murray, A.W. (1999). Lesions in many different spindle components activate the spindle checkpoint in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 152, 509-518.
6. Nicklas, R.B., and Koch, C.A. (1969). Chromosome manipulation III. Induced reorientation and the experimental control of segregation in meiosis. J. Cell Biol. 43, 40-50.
7. Li, X., and Nicklas, R.B. (1995). Mitotic forces control a cell cycle checkpoint. Nature 373, 630-632.
8. Biggins, S., and Murray, A.W. (2001). The budding yeast protein kinase Ipl1/Aurora allows the absence of tension to activate the spindle checkpoint. Genes Dev. 15, 3118-3129.
9. Stern, B.M., and Murray, A.W. (2001). Lack of tension at kinetochores activates the spindle checkpoint in budding yeast. Curr. Biol. 11, 1462-1467.
10. Yamamoto, A., Guacci, V., and Koshland, D. (1996). Pds1p is required for faithful execution of anaphase in the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 133, 85-97.
11. Cohen-Fix, O., Peters, J.M., Kirschner, M.W., and Koshland, D. (1996). Anaphase initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by the APC-dependent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor Pds1p. Genes Dev. 10, 3081-3093.
12. Klein, F., Mahr, P., Galova, M., Buonomo, S.B., Michaelis, C., Nairz, K., and Nasmyth, K. (1999). A central role for cohesins in sister chromatid cohesion, formation of axial elements, and recombination during yeast meiosis. Cell 98, 91-103.
13. Buonomo, S.B., Clyne, R.K., Fuchs, J., Loidl, J., Uhlmann, F., and Nasmyth, K. (2000). Disjunction of homologous chromosomes in meiosis I depends on proteolytic cleavage of the meiotic cohesin Rec8 by separin. Cell 103, 387-398.
14. Nicklas, R.B. (1967). Chromosome micromanipulation. II. Induced reorientation and the experimental control of segregation in meiosis. Chromosoma 21, 17-50.
15. Nicklas, R.B., and Koch, C.A. (1969). Chromosome micromanipulation. 3. Spindle fiber tension and the reorientation of maloriented chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 43, 40-50.
16. Robinett, C.C., Straight, A.F., Li, G., Wilhelm, C., Sudlow, G., Murray, A.W., and Belmont, A. (1996). In vivo localization of DNA sequences and visualization of large scale chromatin organization using lac operator/ repressor recognition. J. Cell Biol. 135, 1685-1700.
17. Straight, A.F., Belmont, A.S., Robinett, C.C., and Murray, A.W. (1996). GFP tagging of budding yeast chromosomes reveals that protein-protein interactions can mediate sister chromatid cohesion. Curr. Biol. 6, 1599-1608.
18. Goshima, G., and Yanagida, M. (2000). Establishing biorientation occurs with precocious separation of the sister kinetochores, but not the arms, in the early spindle of budding yeast. Cell 100, 619-633.
19. He, X., Rines, D.R., Espelin, C.W., and Sorger, P.K. (2001). Molecular analysis of kinetochore-microtubule attachment in budding yeast. Cell 106, 195-206.
20. Shonn, M.A., McCarroll, R., and Murray, A.W. (2002). Spo13 protects meiotic cohesin at centromeres in meiosis I. Genes Dev. 16, 1659-1671.
21. Hwang, L.H., Lau, L.F., Smith, D.L., Mistrot, C.A., Hardwick, K.G., Hwang, E.S., Amon, A., and Murray, A.W. (1998). Budding yeast Cdc20: a target of the spindle checkpoint. Science 279, 1041-1044.
22. Kim, S.H., Lin, D.P., Matsumoto, S., Kitazono, A., and Matsumoto, T. (1998). Fission yeast Slp1: an effector of the Mad2-dependent spindle checkpoint. Science 279, 1045-1047.
23. King, J.M., and Nicklas, R.B. (2000). Tension on chromosomes increases the number of kinetochore microtubules but only within limits. J. Cell Sci. 113, 3815-3823.
24. Ross, L.O., Maxfield, R., and Dawson, D. (1996). Exchanges are not equally able to enhance meiotic chromosome segregation in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 4979-4983.