Design of combinatorial protein libraries of optimal size

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 769-777

  Saraf, Manish C ^a   Gupta, Anshuman ^a   Maranas, Costas D ^a  

^a The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Combinatorial protein libraries; Directed evolution protocols; Optimal library design; Protein engineering; Residue residue clashes

Indexed keywords

DIHYDROFOLATE REDUCTASE; HYBRID PROTEIN; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BACILLUS SUBTILIS; CALCULATION; COMBINATORIAL LIBRARY; CROSSING OVER; ESCHERICHIA COLI; LACTOBACILLUS CASEI; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; QUALITY CONTROL;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACIDS; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES; DATABASES, PROTEIN; DIRECTED MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; PROTEINS;

BACILLUS SUBTILIS; COLI BACILLUS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; LACTOBACILLUS CASEI;

EID: 24644518006     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20490     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Stemmer WP. Rapid evolution of a protein in vitro by DNA shuffling. Nature 1994;370:389-391.
2. Joern JM, Meinhold P, Arnold FH. Analysis of shuffled gene libraries. J Mol Biol 2002;316:643-656.
3. Moore GL, Maranas CD. Computational challenges in combinatorial library design for protein engineering. AICHE J 2004;50:262-272.
4. Ness JE, Kim S, Gottman A, Pak R, Krebber A, Borchert TV, Govindarajan S, Mundorff EC, Minshull J. Synthetic shuffling expands functional protein diversity by allowing amino acids to recombine independently. Nat Biotechnol 2002;20:1251-1255.
5. Coco WM, Encell LP, Levinson WE, Crist MJ, Loomis AK, Licato LL, Arensdorf JJ, Sica N, Pienkos PT, Monticello DJ. Growth factor engineering by degenerate homoduplex gene family recombination. Nat Biotechnol 2002;20:1246-1250.
6. Hiraga K, Arnold FH. General method for sequence-independent site-directed chimeragenesis. J Mol Biol 2003;330:287-296.
7. Patrick WM, Firth AE, Blackburn JM. User-friendly algorithms for estimating completeness and diversity in randomized protein-encoding libraries. Protein Eng 2003;16:451-457.
8. Ostermeier M. Synthetic gene libraries: in search of the optimal diversity. Trends Biotechnol 2003;21:244-247.
9. Osborne MJ, Schnell J, Benkovic SJ, Dyson HJ, Wright PE. Backbone dynamics in dihydrofolate reductase complexes: role of loop flexibility in the catalytic mechanism. Biochemistry 2001;40:9846-9859.
10. Rod TH, Radkiewicz JL, Brooks CL 3rd. Correlated motion and the effect of distal mutations in dihydrofolate reductase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:6980-6985.
11. Sawaya MR, Kraut J. Loop and subdomain movements in the mechanism of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase: crystallographic evidence. Biochemistry 1997;36:586-603.
12. Agarwal PK, Billeter SR, Rajagopalan PT, Benkovic SJ, Hammes-Schiffer S. Network of coupled promoting motions in enyzme catalysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:2794-2799.
13. Saraf MC, Horswill AR, Benkovic SJ, Maranas CD. FamClash: a method for ranking the activity of engineered enyzmes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:4142-4147.
14. Saraf MC, Maranas CD. Using a residue clash map to functionally characterize protein recombination hybrids. Protein Eng 2003;16:1025-1034.
15. Moore GL, Maranas CD. Identifying residue-residue clashes in protein hydrids by using a second-order mean-field approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:5091-5096.
16. Voigt CA, Martinez C, Wang ZG, Mayo SL, Arnold FH. Protein building blocks preserved by recombination. Nat Struct Biol 2002;9:553-558.
17. Meyer MM, Silberg JJ, Voigt CA, Endelman JB, Mayo SL, Wang ZG, Arnold FH. Library analysis of SCHEME-guided protein recombination. Protein Sci 2003;12:1686-1693.
18. Endelman JB, Silberg JJ, Wang ZG, Arnold FH. Site-directed protein recombination as a shortest-path problem. Protein Eng Des Sel 2004;17:589-594.
19. Saraf MC, Moore GL, Maranas CD. Using multiple sequence correlation analysis to characterize functionally important protein regions. Protein Eng 2003;16:397-406.
20. Lichtarge O, Bourne HR, Cohen FE. An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J Mol Biol 1996;257:342-358.
21. Nagi AD, Regan L. An inverse correlation between loop length and stability in a four-helix-bundle protein. Fold Des 1997;2:67-75.
22. Bogarad LD, Deem MW. A hierarchical approach to protein molecular evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:2591-2595.
23. Glover F. Improved linear integer programming formulations of nonlinear integer problems. Manage Sci 1975;22:455-460.
24. Bateman A, Coin L, Durbin R, Finn RD, Holich V, Griffiths-Jones S, Khanna A, Marshall M, Moxon S, Sonnhammer EL, Studholme DJ, Yeats C, Eddy SR. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32(Database issue)D138-D141.
25. Brooke A, Kendrick D, Meeraus A, Raman R. GAMS: the solver manuals. Washington, DC: GAMS Developemnt Corporation; 2005.
26. Brooke A, Kendrick D, Meeraus A, Raman R. GAMS: a user's guide. Washington, DC: GAMS Development Corporation; 2003.
27. Looger LL, Dwyer MA, Smith JJ, Hellinga HW. Computational design of receptor and sensor proteins with novel functions. Nature 2003;423:185-190.
28. Dwyer MA, Looper LL, Hellinga HW. Computational design of a biologically active enzyme. Science 2004;304:1967-1971.
29. Kuhlman B, Dantas G, Ireton GC, Varani G, Stoddard BL, Baker D. Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy. Science 2003;302:1364-1368.