Taking stock of science in the schoolhouse: Four ideas to foster effective instruction

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 189-199

  Crockett, Jean B ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442600496     PISSN: 00222194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00222194040370030201     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (61)

1. Bateman, B. D. (1992). The essentials of teaching. Creswell, OR: Otter Ink.
2. Bateman, B. D., & Linden, M. A. (1998). Better IEPs: How to develop legally correct and educationally useful programs. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
3. Bays, D. A. (2001). Supervision of special education instruction in rural public school districts: A grounded theory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg.
4. Billingsley, B. S. (2002a). Improving special education teacher retention: Implications from a decade of research, Juournal of Special Education Leadership, 15, 60-66.
5. Billingsley, B. S. (2002b). Special education teacher retention and attrition: A critical analysis of the literature. Gainesville: University of Florida, Center on Personnel Studies in Special Education.
6. Bryant, D. P., Linan-Thompson, S., Ugel, N., Hamff, A., & Hougen, M. (2001). The effects of professional development for middle school general and special education teachers on implementation of reading strategies in inclusive content area classes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 251-264.
7. Cook, B. G. (2001). A comparison of teachers' attitudes toward their included students with mild and severe disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 34, 203-213.
8. Council for Exceptional Children. (2000). Bright futures for exceptional learners: An action agenda to achieve quality conditions for teaching and learning. Reston, VA: Author.
9. Coyne, M. D., Kame'enui, E. j., & Simmons, D. C. (2001). Prevention and intervention in beginning reading: Two complex systems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 62-73.
10. Crockett, J. B. (2001). The meaning of science and empirical rigor in the social sciences [Special issue]. Behavioral Disorders, 27(1).
11. Crockett, J. B. (2002). Special education's role in preparing responsive leaders for inclusive schools. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 157-168.
12. Crockett, J. B. (in press). The science of schooling for students with learning disabilities: Recommendations for service delivery linking practice with research. In B. Y. L. Wong (Ed.), Learning about learning disabilities (3rd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.
13. Crockett, j. B., & Kauffman, J. M. (1998). Classrooms for students with learning disabilities: Realities, dilemmas, and recommendations for service delivery. In B. Y. L. Wong (Ed.), Learning about learning disabilities (pp. 489-525). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
14. Crockett, J. B., & Kauffman, J. M. (1999). The least restrictive environment: Its origins and interpretations in special education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Deshler, D. D., Schumaker, J. B., Lenz, B. K., Bulgren, J. A., Hock, M. F., Knight, J., et al. (2001). Ensuring content-area learning by secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 96-108.
16. Division for Learning Disabilities. (2003). DLD testimony on IDEA reauthorization. The DLD Times, 20(1), 3.
17. Ehrlich, E., Flexner, S. B., Carruth, G., & Hawkins, J. M. (Eds.). (1980). Oxford American dictionary. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Espin, C. A., Deno, S. L., & Albayrak-Kaymak, D. (1998). Individualized education programs in resource and inclusive settings: How "individualized" are they? The Journal of Special Education, 32, 164-174.
19. Feuer, M. J., Towne, L., & Shavelson, R. J. (2002). Scientific culture and educational research. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 4-14.
20. Forness, S. R. (2002). Foreword. In J. M. Kauffman (Ed.), Education deform: Bright people sometimes say stupid things about education (pp. v-vi). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
21. Gersten, R. (2001). Sorting out the roles of research in the improvement of practice. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 45-50.
22. Gersten, R., Chard, D., & Baker, S. (2000). Factors enhancing sustained use of research-based instructional practices. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 445-457.
23. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 279-320.
24. Glickman, C. D. (2002). Leadership for learning: How to help teachers succeed. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
25. Greenwood, C. R. (2001). Science and students with learning and behavioral problems. Behavioral Disorders, 27, 37-52.
26. Gross, B. R. (1996). Flights of fancy: Science, reason, and common sense. In P. R. Gross, N. Levitt, & M. W. Lewis (Eds.), The flight from science and reason (pp. 79-86). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
27. Hassel, K., & Holloway, J. (2002). A framework for school leaders: Linking the ISLLC standards to practice. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
28. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.
29. Kauffman, J. M. (1999). Commentary: Today's special education and its messages for tomorrow. The Journal of Special Education, 32, 244-254.
30. Kauffman, J. M. (2002). Education deform: Bright people sometimes say stupid things about education. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
31. Kaufman, M. J., & Lewis, L. M. (1999). Confusing each with all: A policy warning. In R. Gallimore, L. P. Bernheimer, D. L. MacMillan, D. L. Speece, & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Developmental perspectives on children with high-incidence disabilities (pp. 223-244). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (2000). Policy decisions in special education: The role of meta-analysis. In R. Gersten, E. P. Schiller, & S. Vaughn (Eds.). (2000). Contemporary special education research: Syntheses of the knowledge base on critical instructional issues (pp. 281-326). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Klingner, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (2002). The changing roles and responsibilities of an LD specialist. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 19-31.
34. Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M. T., Schumm, J. S., & Elbaum, B. (1998). Out-comes for students with and without learning disabilities in inclusive class-rooms. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 153-161.
35. Landrum, T. J., Cook, B. G., Tankersley, M., and Fitzgerald, S. (2002). Teacher perceptions of the trustworthiness, usability, and accessibility of information from different sources. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 42-48.
36. Lashley, C., & Boscardin, M. L. (2002). Special education administration at a crossroads: Availability, licensure, and preparation of special education administrators. Gainesville: University of Florida, Center on Personnel Studies in Special Education.
37. Mastropieri, M. A. (2001). Introduction to the special issue: Is the glass half full or half empty? Challenges encountered by first-year special education teachers. The Journal of Special Education, 34, 66-74.
38. Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2001). Promoting inclusion in secondary class-rooms. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 265-274.
39. McCray, A. D., Vaughn, S., & Neal, L. I. (2001). Not all students learn to read by third grade: Middle school students speak out about their reading disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 35, 17-30.
40. Mock, D. R., & Kauffman, J. M. (in press). The delusion of full inclusion. In J. W. Jacobson, J. A. Mulick, & R. M. Foxx (Eds.), Fads: Dubious and improbable treatments for developmental disabilities. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Mostert, M. P., & Kavale, K. A. (2001). Evaluation of research for usable knowledge in behavioral disorders: Ignoring the irrelevant, considering the germane. Behavioral Disorders, 27, 53-68.
42. O'Connor, R. E. (1999). Teachers learning Ladders to Literacy. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14, 203-214.
43. Sasso, G. M. (2001). The retreat from inquiry and knowledge in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 34, 178-193.
44. Sharp, K. G., & Patasky, V. M. (2002). The current legal status of inclusion. Horsham, PA: LRP.
45. Speece, D., & Keogh, B. (Eds.). (1996). Research on classroom ecologies: Implications for inclusion of children with learning disabilities. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72, 387-431.
47. Study of Personnel Needs in Special Education. (2001). General education teachers' role in special education. Retrieved November 4, 2002, from http://www.spense.org
48. Swanson, H. L. (2000a). Issues facing the field of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23, 37-50.
49. Swanson, H. L. (2000b). What instruction works for students with learning disabilities? Summarizing the results from a meta-analysis of intervention studies. In R. Gersten, E. P. Schiller, & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Contemporary special education research: Syntheses of the knowledge base on critical instructional issues (pp. 1-30). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Swanson, H. L., & Deshler, D. (2003). Instructing adolescents with learning disabilities: Converting a meta-analysis to practice, journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 124-135.
51. Swanson, H. L., & Hoskyn, M. (1998). A synthesis of experimental intervention literature for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 68, 271-321.
52. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. (2001). Twenty-third annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
53. Vaughn, S., & Damman, J. E. (2001). Science and sanity in special education. Behavioral Disorders, 27, 21-29.
54. Vaughn, S., Gersten, R., & Chard, D. J. (2000). The underlying message in LD intervention research: Findings from research syntheses. Exceptional Children, 67, 99-114.
55. Weiss, M. P., & Brigham, F. J. (2000). Co-teaching and the model of shared responsibility: What does the research support? In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 14, pp. 217-245). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
56. Weiss, M. P., & Lloyd, J. W. (2002). Congruence between roles and actions of secondary special educators in co-taught and special education settings. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 58-68.
57. Williams, J. P. (2000). Foreword. In R. Gersten, E. P. Schiller, & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Contemporary special education research: Syntheses of the knowledge base on critical instructional issues (pp. vii-viii). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
58. Woodward, J. P., & Kaufman, M. J. (1998). Contextual issues and their influence on curricular change. In E. J. Kame'enui & D. W. Carnine (Eds.), Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners (pp. 179-191). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
59. Yinger, R. J., & Nolen, A. L. (2003). Surviving the legitimacy challenge. Phi Delta Kappan, 84, 386-390.
60. Zigmond, N. (1997). Educating students with disabilities: The future of special education. In J. W. Lloyd, E. J. Kameenui, & D. Chard (Eds.), Issues in educating students with disabilities (pp. 377-390). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. Zigmond, N., & Magiera, K. (2002). A focus on co-teaching. Current Practice Alerts, 6, Retrieved November 4, 2002, from http://www. teachingld.org/pdf/Alert6.pdf