Science and sanity in special education

Behavioral Disorders

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 21-29

  Vaughn, Sharon ^a   Dammann, James E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b University of Texas ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035541702     PISSN: 01987429     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/019874290102700107     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Banks, J. A. (1998). The lives and values of researchers: Implications for educating citizens in a multicultural society. Educational Researcher, 27(7), 6.
2. Carnine, D. (1997). Bridging the research-to-practice gap. Exceptional Children, 63, 513-521.
3. Carnine, D. (2000, April). Why education experts resist effective practices. Report of the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
4. Chall, J. S. (2000). The academic achievement challenge. New York: Guilford.
5. Cooper, H. (1996). Speaking power to truth: Reflections of an educational researcher after 4 years of school board service. Educational Researcher, 25(1), 29-34.
6. Diamond, J. (1997). Guns, germs, and steel. New York: Norton.
7. Gage, N. L. (1991). The obviousness of social and educational research results. Educational Researcher, 20(1), 10-16.
8. Gersten, R., & Brengelman, S. U. (1996). The quest to translate research into classroom practice: The emerging knowledge base. Remedial and Special Education, 17(2), 67-74.
9. Gersten, R., Schiller, E., & Vaughn, S. (Eds.). (2000). Contemporary special education research: Syntheses of the knowledge base on critical instructional issues. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Gersten, R., Vaughn, S., Deshler, D., & Schiller, E. (1997). What we know about using research findings: Implications for improving special education practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 466-476.
11. Gross, P. R., & Levitt, N. (1994). The academic left and its quarrels with science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
12. Holton, G. (1993). Science and anti-science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Howe, K., & Eisenhart, M. (1990). Standards for qualitative (and quantitative) research: A prolegomenon. Educational Researcher, 19(4), 2-9.
14. Kauffman, J. M. (1993). How we might achieve the radical reform of special education. Exceptional Children, 60, 6-16.
15. Lyon, G. R. (1999). Statement to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, U.S. House of Representatives.
16. Malouf, D. B., & Schiller, E. P. (1995). Practice and research in special education. Exceptional Children, 61, 414-424.
17. National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health.
18. Peshkin, A. (1988). In search of subjectivity - one's own. Educational Researcher, 17(1), 17-22.
19. Schumm, J. S., & Vaughn, S. (1991). Making adaptations for mainstreamed students: General classroom teachers' perspectives. Remedial and Special Education, 12(4), 18-27.
20. Shermer, M. (1997). Why people believe weird things. New York: Freeman.
21. Smith, J. K., & Heshusius, L. (1986). Closing down the conversation: The end of the quantitative-qualitative debate among educational inquirers. Educational Researcher, 75(1), 4-12.
22. Stanovich, K. E. (1994). Romance and reality. Reading Teacher, 47, 280-291.
23. Stanovich, K. E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading. New York: Guilford.
24. Walberg, H. J. (1998). Foreword. In K. Topping & S. Ehly (Eds.), Peer-assisted learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.