Issues facing the field of learning disabilities

Learning Disability Quarterly

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 37-51

  Swanson, H Lee ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034338692     PISSN: 07319487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1511098     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Aaron, P. G. (1997). The impending demise of the discrepancy formula. Review of Education Research, 67(4), 461-502.
2. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MlT Press.
3. Adams, M. J., & Bruck, M. (1993). Word recognition: The interface of educational policies and scientific research. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 113-139.
4. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. London: Oxford University Press.
5. Beitchman, J. H., & Young, A. R. (1997). Learning disorders with a special emphasis on reading disorders: A review of the past 10 years. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 36(8), 1020-1032.
6. Bereiter, C. (1963). Some persisting dilemmas in the measurement of change. In C. W. Harris (Ed.), Problems in measuring change (pp. 3-20). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
7. Bishop, D.V.M. (1991). Developmental reading disabilities: The role of phonological processing has been overestimated. Mind & Language, 6, 97-101.
8. Bishop, D.V.M. & Adams, C. (1990). A prospective study of the relationship between specific language impairment, phonological disorder, and reading retardation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 31, 1027-1050.
9. Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1985). Rhyme and reason in reading and spelling. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1987). Application of hierarchical linear models to assessing change. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 147-158.
11. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback & self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245-281.
12. Carnine, D. (1994). Diverse learners and prevailing, emerging and research based educational approaches and their tools. School Psychology Review, 23, 341-350.
13. Council for Learning Disabilities. (1993). Position statement and concerns about the "Full Inclusion" of students with learning disabilities in regular education classrooms. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16, 126.
14. Cronbach, L., & Furby, L. (1970). How we should measure "change" - or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74, 68-80.
15. Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G. C. (1953). Assessing similarity between profiles. Psychological Bulletin, 74, 68-80.
16. Cruickshank, W. M. (1977). Least restrictive placement: Administrative wishful thinking. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10, 193-194.
17. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.
18. Dearborn, W. F. (1929). Teaching the nonreader. Elementary School Journal, 30, 266-270.
19. Dillon, S. (1994, April 7). A class apart: Special education soaks up New York's school resources. New York Times.
20. Division for Learning Disabilities of the Council for Exceptional Children. (1993). Inclusion: What does it mean for students with learning disabilities? The DLD Times, 10(3), 4i.
21. Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, L.J., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T.E., & Silva, P.A. (1996), The (artefactual) remission of reading disability: Psychometric lessons in the study of stability and change in behavioral development. Developmental Psychology, 32, 132-140.
22. Fletcher, J., Shaywitz, S. E., Shankweiler, D. P., Katz, L., Liberman, I., Stuebing, K., Francis, D., Fowler, A., & Shaywitz, B. A. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 6-23.
23. Foorman, B. (1995). Research on "The great debate" code-oriented versus whole language approaches to reading. School Psychology Review, 24, 376-392.
24. Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Stuebing, K. K., Davidson, K. C., & Thompson, N. M. (1991). Analysis of change: Modeling individual growth. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 59, 27-37.
25. Frankenberger, W., & Fronzaglio, K. (1991). A review of states' criteria and procedures for identifying children with learning disabilities, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 495-500.
26. Frederiksen, J. R., & Warren, B. M. (1987). A cognitive framework for developing expertise in reading. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology Vol. 3 (pp. 1-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (1994). Inclusive schools movement and the radicalization of special education reform. Exceptional Children, 60, 294-309.
28. Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Working memory and language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Gerber, P. I., & Reiff, H. B. (1991). Speaking for themselves: Ethnographic interviews with adults with learning disabilities. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
30. Gersten, R., Walker, H., & Darch, C. (1998). Relationship between teachers' effectiveness and their tolerance for handicapped students. Exceptional Children, 54, 433-438.
31. Gray, W. S. (1940). Reading. Review of Educational Research, 10, 79-106.
32. Harris, K. R. (1991). Developing self-regulated learners: The role of private speech and self-instructions. Educational Psychologist, 25, 35-49.
33. Johns, G. (1981). Difference score measures of organizational behavior variables: A critique. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27, 44-463.
34. Jorm, A., Share, D., Maclean, R., & Matthews, R. (1986). Cognitive factors at school entry predictive of specific reading retardation and general reading awkwardness: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 27, 45-54.
35. Kail, R., & Bisanz, J. (1993). The information processing perspective on cognitive development in childhood and adolescence. In R. Sternberg & C. A. Berg (Eds.), Intellectual development, Vol 1 (pp. 229-260). New York: Cambridge.
36. Kauffman, J. M. (1993). How we might achieve the radical reform of special education. Exceptional Children, 60, 6-16.
37. Kavale, K. A. (1990). Variances and verities in learning disability interventions. In T. E. Scruggs & B.Y.L. Wong (Eds.). Intervention research in learning disabilities (pp. 3-33). New York: Springer-Verlag.
38. Kearney, C. A., & Durand, V. M. (1992). How prepared are our teachers for mainstreamed classroom settings? A survey of post-secondary schools of education in New York State. Exceptional Children, 59, 6-11.
39. Keogh, B. (1988). Improving services for problem learners: Rethinking and restructuring. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21(1), 19-22.
40. Klinger, J., Vaughn S., Schumm, J., & Shay, C. (1998). Inclusion or pull-out: Which do student prefer? Journal of Learning Disabilties, 31(2), 148-158.
41. Lerner, J. W., Cousin, P. T., & Richeck, M. (1992). Critical issues in learning disabilities: Whole language learning. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 7, 226-230.
42. Manset, G., & Semmel, M. (1997). Are inclusive programs for students with mild disabilities effective? A comparative review of model programs. Journal of Special Education, 31, 155-180.
43. Marston, D. (1996). A comparison of inclusion only, pull-out only, and combined service models. Journal of Special Education, 30(2), 121-132.
44. Meltzer, L. (Ed.). (1994). Strategy assessment and instruction for students with learning disabilities: From theory to practice. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
45. Mercer, C., Jordan, L., Allsopp, D. H., & Mercer, A. R. (1996). Learning disability definitions and criteria used by state education departments. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19(4), 217-232.
46. Monroe, M. (1932). Children who cannot read. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47. National Education Association. (1994). NEA policy on appropriate inclusion. Washington, DC: Author.
48. Orton Dyslexia Society. (1994, Fall). ODS position statement on inclusion [Special issue]. Perspectives on Inclusion, 20(4), 2-3.
49. Pressley, M., & Allington, R. (in press) What should reading instructional research be the research of? Issues in Education.
50. Pressley, M., & Harris K. R. (1994). Increasing the quality of educational intervention research. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 191-208.
51. Pressley, M., & Rankin, J. (1994). More about whole language methods of reading instruction for students at risk for early reading failure. Learning DisabilitiesResearch & Practice, 9, 157-168.
52. Reynolds, C. R. (1984-1985). Critical measurement issues in learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 18, 453-476.
53. Roberts, R., & Mather, N. (1995). The return of students with learning disabilities to regular classrooms: A sellout? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 10, 46-58.
54. Rousch, W. (1995). Arguing over why Johnny can't read Science, 267, 1896-1898.
55. Rumelhart, D. E. (1997). Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance, Vol. 6 (pp. 573-603). hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
56. Rutter, M., & Yule, W. (1975). The concept of specific reading retardation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 16, 181-197.
57. Seidenberg, M. S. (1992). Dyslexia in a computational model of word recognition in reading. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp 243-274). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
58. Shallice, T. (1988). From neuropsychology to mental structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Shanker, A. (1995, September 19). Where we stand: a rush to inclusion. New York Times, The Week in Review, p. 9.
60. Shankweiler, D., & Crain, S. (1986). Language mechanisms and reading disorder: A modular approach. Cognition, 24, 139-168.
61. Shaywitz, S. E., Escobar, M. D., Shaywitz, B. A., Fletcher, J. M., & Makugh, R. (1992). Evidence that dyslexia may represent the lower tail of a normal distribution of reading ability. The New England Journal of Medicine, 326, 145-150.
62. Shaywitz, B. A., Fletcher, J. M., Holahan, J. M., & Shaywitz, S. E. (1992). Discrepancy compared to low achievement definitions of reading disability: Results from the Connecticut Longitudinal Study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 639-648.
63. Shepard, L. A. (1980). An evaluation of the regression discrepancy method for identifying children with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 14, 79-91.
64. Siegel, L. S. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469-479.
65. Siegel, L. S. (1992). An evaluation of the discrepancy definition of dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 618-629.
66. Sovik, N., Frostad, P., & Lie, A. (1994) Can discrepancy between IQ and basic skills be explained by learning strategies? British Journal of Education Psychology, 64, 389-405.
67. Sparks, R. L. (1995). Phonological awareness in hyperlexic children. Reading and Writing, 7, 217-235.
68. Stanovich, K. (1986). Matthew effect in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407.
69. Stanovich, K. E. (1988). The right and wrong places to look for the cognitive locus of reading disability. Annals of Dyslexia, 38, 154-177.
70. Stanovich, K. E. (1990). Concepts in developmental theories of reading skill: Cognitive resources, automaticity, and modularity. Developmental Review, 10, 72-100.
71. Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 7-29.
72. Stanovich, K., & Siegel, L.S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24-53.
73. Stanovich, K. E., & Stanovich, P. (1997). Further thoughts on aptitude/achievement discrepancy. Educational Psychology in Practice, 13(1), 3-8.
74. Swanson, H. L. (1988). Toward a metatheory of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 196-209.
75. Swanson, H. L. (in press). A comprehensive synthesis of reading intervention research for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities.
76. Swanson, H. L., & Christie, L. (1994). Implicit notions about learning disabilities: Some directions for definitions. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 9, 244-254.
77. Swanson, H. L., & Hoskyn, M. (1998). A comprehensive synthesis of experimental intervention for students with learning disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 276-321.
78. Swanson, H. L., & Sache-Lee (in press). A synthesis of single-subject intervention research for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities.
79. Troia, G. A. (in press). Phonological awareness intervention research: A critical review of the experimental methodology. Reading Research Quarterly.
80. Wall, T. D., & Payne, R. (1973). Are deficiency scores deficient? Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, 322-326.
81. Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (1998). Child development and emergent literacy. Child Development, 69(3), 848-872.
82. Yule, W., Rutter, M., Berger, M., & Thompson, J. (1974). Over-and underachievement in reading distribution in the general population. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 44, 1-12.
83. Zimmerman, D. W., & Williams, R. H. (1982). Gain scores in research can be highly reliable. Journal of Educational Measurement, 19, 149-154.