Establishment and expression of embryonic axes: Comparisons between different model organisms;Établissement et expression des axes embryonnaires: Comparaisons entre différents organismes modèles

Medecine/Sciences

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 526-538

  Prodon, François ^a   Prulière, Gérard ^a   Chenevert, Janet ^a   Sardet, Christian ^a  

^a LABORATOIRE D OCÉANOGRAPHIE DE VILLEFRANCHE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MESSENGER RNA; PROTEIN;

CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CELL DIVISION; CIONA INTESTINALIS; CYTOSKELETON; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYO POLARITY; FERTILIZATION; GASTRULATION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE DEVELOPMENT; REVIEW; SEA URCHIN; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; XENOPUS LAEVIS; AMPHIBIA; ANIMAL; ANIMAL EMBRYO; ANIMAL MODEL; DROSOPHILA; ECTODERM; ENDODERM; GASTRULA; MORPHOGENESIS; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT;

ANURA; ASCIDIACEA; CAENORHABDITIS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CIONA; CIONA INTESTINALIS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ECHINOIDEA; INSECTA; MELANOGASTER; RICKETTSIA SP. PAR; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

AMPHIBIA; ANIMALS; BODY PATTERNING; DROSOPHILA; ECTODERM; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; EMBRYONIC AND FETAL DEVELOPMENT; ENDODERM; GASTRULA; MICE; MODELS, ANIMAL; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 2442534912     PISSN: 07670974     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/medsci/2004205526     Document Type: Review

References (100)

1. Wilson EB. The cell in development and inheritance. New York: Macmillan, 1896.
2. Child CM. Patterns and problems of development. Chicago, 1941.
3. Sardet C, Prodon, F, Pruliere, G, Chenevert J. Polarisation des œufs et des embryons: principes communs. Med Sci (Paris) 2004; 20: 414-23.
4. Goldstein B, Freeman G. Axis specification in animal development. BioEssays 1997; 19: 105-16.
5. Goldstein B, Frisse LM, Thomas WK. Embryonic axis specification in nematodes: Evolution of the first step in development. Curr Biol 1998; 8: 157-60.
6. Gilbert SF. developmental biology. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates Inc., 2000: 749
7. Wolpert L. Principles of development. New York: Oxford University Press Inc., 2002: 542
8. Pellettieri J, Seydoux G. Anterior-posterior polarity in C. elegans and Drosophila. PARallels and differences. Science 2002; 298: 1946-50.
9. Wodarz A. Establishing cell polarity in development. Nat Cell Biol 2002; 4: E39-44.
10. 2+ signalling during fertilization of echinoderm eggs. Sem Cell Dev Biol 2001; 12: 45-51.
11. Stricker SA. Comparative biology of calcium signaling during fertilization and egg activation in animals. Dev Biol 1999; 211: 157-76.
12. Sardet C, Prodon F, Dumollard R, et al. Structure and function of the egg cortex from oogenesis through fertilization. Dev Biol 2002; 241: 1-23.
13. Sardet C, McDougall A, Houliston E. Cytoplasmic domains in egg. Trends Cell Biol 1994; 4: 166-71.
14. Frick JE, Ruppert EE. Primordial germ cells and oocytes of Branchiostoma virginiae (Cephalochordata, Acrania) are flagellated epithelial cells: Relationship between epithelial and primary egg polarity. Zygote 1997; 5: 139-51.
15. Wylie C. Germ cells. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2000; 10: 410-3.
16. Matova N, Cooley L. Comparative aspects of animal oogenesis. Dev Biol 2001; 231: 291-320.
17. Ikenishi K. Germ plasm in Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila and Xenopus. Dev Growth Differ 1998; 40: 1-10.
18. Carre D, Djediat C, Sardet C. Formation of a large Vasa-positive germ granule and its inheritance by germ cells in the enigmatic Chaetognaths. Development 2002; 129: 661-70.
19. Gard DL. Confocal microscopy and 3-D reconstruction of the cytoskeleton of Xenopus oocytes. Microsc Res Tech 1999; 44: 388-414.
20. Houston DW, King ML. Germ plasm and molecular determinants of germ cell fate. Curr Top Dev Biol 2000; 50: 155-81.
21. Kloc M, Bilinski S, Chan AP, et al. RNA localization and germ cell determination in Xenopus. Int Rev Cytol 2001; 203: 63-91.
22. Chang P, Perez-Mongiovi D, Houliston E. Organisation of Xenopus oocyte and egg cortices. Microsc Res Tech 1999; 44: 415-29.
23. Kloc M, Zearfoss NR, Etkin LD. Mechanisms of subcellular mRNA localization. Cell 2002; 108: 533-44.
24. Gard DL. Axis formation during amphibian oogenesis: Re-evaluating the role of the cytoskeleton. Curr Top Dev Biol 1995; 30: 215-52.
25. Terasaki M, Runft LL, Hand AR. Changes in organization of the endoplasmic reticulum during Xenopus oocyte maturation and activation. Mol Biol Cell 2001; 12: 1103-16.
26. Verlhac MH, Lefebvre C, Guillaud P, et al. Asymmetric division in mouse oocytes: With or without Mos. Curr Biol 2000; 10: 1303-6.
27. Fernandez J, Roegiers F, Cantillana V, Sardet C. Formation and localization of cytoplasmic domains in leech and ascidian zygotes. Int J Dev Biol 1998; 42: 1075-84.
28. Nishida H. Specification of developmental fates in ascidian embryos: Molecular approach to maternal determinants and signaling molecules. Int Rev Cytol 2002; 217: 227-76.
29. Sasakura Y, Ogasawara M, Makabe KW. Two pathways of maternal RNA localization at the posterior-vegetal cytoplasm in early ascidian embryo. Dev Biol 2000; 220: 365-78.
30. Sardet C, Nishida H, Prodon F, Sawada K. Maternal mRNAs of PEM and macho 1, the ascidian muscle determinant, associate and move with a rough endoplasmic reticulum network in the egg cortex. Development 2003; 130: 5839-49.
31. King ML, Zhou Y, Bubunenko M. Polarizing genetic information in the egg: RNA localization in the frog oocyte. BioEssays 1999; 21: 546-57.
32. Ossipova O, He X, Green J. Molecular cloning and developmental expression of Par-1/MARK homologues XPar-1A and XPar-1B from Xenopus laevis. Gene Expr Patterns 2002; 2: 145-50.
33. Choi SC, Kim J, Han JK. Identification and developmental expression of par-6 gene in Xenopus laevis. Mech Dev 2000; 91: 347-50.
34. Ohno S. Intercellular junctions and cellular polarity: The PAR-aPKC complex, a conserved core cassette playing fundamental roles in cell polarity. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2001; 13: 641-8.
35. Van Eeden F, St Johnston D. The polarisation of the anterior-posterior and dorsal-ventral axes during Drosophila oogenesis. Curr Dp Gen Dev 1999; 9: 396-404.
36. Riechmann V, Ephrussi A. Axis formation during Drosophila oogenesis. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2001; 11: 374-83.
37. Navarro C, Lehmann R, Morris J. Oogenesis: Setting one sister above the rest. Curr Biol 2001; 11: R162-5.
38. Lopez-Schier H. The polarisation of the anteroposterior axis in Drosophila. Bioessays 2003; 25: 781-91.
39. Kemphues K. PARsing embryonic polarity. Cell 2000; 101: 345-8.
40. Johnstone D, Lasko P. Translational regulation and RNA localization in Drosophila oocytes and embryos. Annu Rev Genet 2001; 35: 365-406.
41. Cha BJ, Serbus LR, Koppetsch BS, Theurkauf WE. Kinesin I-dependent cortical exclusion restricts pole plasm to the oocyte posterior. Nat Cell Biol 2002; 4: 592-8.
42. Houchmandzadeh B, Wieschaus E, Leibler S. Establishment of developmental precision and proportions in the early Drosophila embryo. Nature 2002; 415: 798-802.
43. Blankenship JT, Wieschaus E. Two new roles for the Drosophila AP patterning system in early morphogenesis. Development 2001; 128: 5129-38.
44. Anderson KV. Pinning down positional information: Dorsal-ventral polarity in the Drosophila embryo. Cell 1998; 95: 439-42.
45. Dissing M, Giordano H, DeLotto R. Autoproteolysis and feedback in a protease cascade directing Drosophila dorsal-ventral cell fate. Embo J 2001; 20: 2387-93.
46. Stathopoulos A, Van Drenth M, Erives A, et al. Whole-genome analysis of dorsal-ventral patterning in the Drosophila embryo. Cell 2002; 111: 687-701.
47. 2+ oscillations in eggs and embryo development. Development 2002; 129: 3533-44.
48. Suzuki K, Tanaka Y, Nakajima Y, et al. Spatiotemporal relationships among early events of fertilization in sea urchin eggs revealed by multiview microscopy. Biophys J 1995; 68: 739-48.
49. Berridge MJ, Lipp P, Bootman MD. The versatility and universality of calcium signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2000; 1: 11-21.
50. Roegiers F, McDougall A, Sardet C. The sperm entry point defines the orientation of the calcium-induced contraction wave that directs the first phase of cytoplasmic reorganization in the ascidian egg. Development 1995; 121: 3457-66.
51. Dumollard R, Sardet C. Three different calcium wave pacemakers in ascidian eggs. J Cell Sci 2001; 114: 2471-81.
52. Roegiers F, Djediat C, Dumollard R, et al. Phases of cytoplasmic and cortical reorganizations of the ascidian zygote between fertilization and first division. Development 1999; 126: 3101-17.
53. Xanthos JB, Kofron M, Tao Q, et al. The roles of three signaling pathways in the formation and function of the Spemann organizer. Development 2002; 129: 4027-43.
54. Holland LZ. Body-plan evolution in the bilateria: Early antero-posterior patterning and the deuterostome-protostome dichotomy. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2000; 10: 434-42.
55. Samuel AD, Murthy VN, Hengartner MO. Calcium dynamics during fertilization in C. elegans. BMC Dev Biol 2001; 1: 8.
56. Golden A. Cytoplasmic flow and the establishment of polarity in C. elegans 1-cell embryos. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2000; 10: 414-20.
57. Goldstein B. Embryonic polarity: A role for microtubules. Curr Biol 2000; 10: R820-2.
58. Lyczak R, Gomes JE, Bowerman B. Heads or tails: Cell polarity and axis formation in the early Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. Dev Cell 2002; 3: 157-66.
59. Rappleye CA, Paredez AR, Smith CN, et al. The coronin-like protein POD-1 is required for anterior-posterior axis formation and cellular architecture in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genes Dev 1999; 13: 2838-51.
60. Gonczy P. Mechanisms of spindle positioning: Focus on flies and worms. Trends Cell Biol 2002; 12: 332-9.
61. Elinson RP, Houliston E. Cytoskeleton in Xenopus oocytes and eggs. Sem Cell Biol 1990; 1: 349-57.
62. Marrari Y, Terasaki M, Arrowsmith V, Houliston E. Local inhibition of cortical rotation in Xenopus eggs by an anti-KRP antibody. Dev Biol 2000; 224: 250-62.
63. Miller JR, Rowning BA, Larabell CA, et al. Establishment of the dorsal-ventral axis in Xenopus embryos coincides with the dorsal enrichment of dishevelled that is dependent on cortical rotation. J Cell Biol 1999; 146: 427-37.
64. Larabell CA, Torres M, Rowning BA, et al. Establishment of the dorso-ventral axis in Xenopus embryos is presaged by early asymmetries in beta-catenin that are modulated by the Wnt signaling pathway. J Cell Biol 1997; 136: 1123-36.
65. Beckhelling C, Perez-Mongiovi D, Houliston E. Localised MPF regulation in eggs. Biol Cell 2000; 92: 245-53.
66. Perez-Mongiovi D, Beckhelling C, Chang P, et al. E. Nuclei and microtubule asters stimulate maturation/M phase promoting factor (MPF) activation in Xenopus eggs and egg cytoplasmic extracts. J Cell Biol 2000; 150: 963-74.
67. Marikawa Y, Elinson RP. Relationship of vegetal cortical dorsal factors in the Xenopus egg with the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Mech Dev 1999; 89: 93-102.
68. Nishida H. Cell fate specification by localized cytoplasmic determinants and cell interactions in ascidian embryos. Int Rev Cytol 1997; 176: 245-306.
69. Nishida H, Sawada K. macho-1 encodes a localized mRNA in ascidian eggs that specifies muscle fate during embryogenesis. Nature 2001; 409: 724-9.
70. Takamura K, Fujimura M, Yamaguchi Y. Primordial germ cells originate from the endodermal strand cells in the ascidian Ciona intestinalis. Dev Genes Evol 2002; 212: 11-8.
71. Seydoux G, Schedl T. The germline in C. elegans: origins, proliferation, and silencing. Int Rev Cytol 2001; 203: 139-85.
72. Goldstein B. When cells tell their neighbors which direction to divide. Dev Dyn 2000; 218: 23-9.
73. Labouesse M, Mango SE. Patterning the C. elegans embryo: moving beyond the cell lineage. Trends Genet 1999; 15: 307-13.
74. Horstadius S. Experimental embryology of echinoderms. London: Clarendon Press, 1973
75. Boveri T. Über die polarität des seeigeleies. Ver der Phys Med Ges zu Wuerzburg 1901; 34: 145-75.
76. Coffman JA, Davidson EH. Oral-abaral axis specification in the sea urchin embryo. I. Axis entrainment by respiratory asymmetry. Dev Biol 2001; 230: 18-28.
77. Henry JJ, Raff RA. Evolutionary change in the process of dorsoventral axis determination in the direct developing sea urchin, Heliocidaris erythrogramma. Dev Biol 1990; 141: 55-69.
78. Gross JM, Peterson RE, Wu SY, McClay DR. LvTbx2/3: A T-box family transcription factor involved in formation of the oral/aboral axis of the sea urchin embryo. Development 2003; 130: 1989-99.
79. Schroeder TE. Expressions of the prefertilization polar axis in sea urchin eggs. Dev Biol 1980; 79: 428-43.
80. Sardet C, Chang P. A marker of animal-vegetal polarity in the egg of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus. The pigment band. Exp Cell Res 1985; 160: 73-82.
81. Angerer LM, Angerer RC. Animal-vegetal axis patterning mechanisms in the early sea urchin embryo. Dev Biol 2000; 218: 1-2.
82. Brandhorst BP, Klein WH. Molecular patterning along the sea urchin animal-vegetal axis. Int Rev Cytol 2002; 213: 183-232.
83. Emily-Fenouil F, Ghiglione C, Lhomond G, et al. GSK3beta/shaggy mediates patterning along the animal-vegetal axis of the sea urchin embryo. Development 1998; 125: 2489-98.
84. McClay DR, Peterson RE, Range RC, et al. A micromere induction signal is activated by beta-catenin and acts through notch to initiate specification of secondary mesenchyme cells in the sea urchin embryo. Development 2000; 127: 5113-22.
85. Sweet HC, Hodor PG, Ettensohn CA. The role of micromere signaling in Notch activation and mesoderm specification during sea urchin embryogenesis. Development 1999; 126: 5255-65.
86. Beddington RS, Robertson EJ. Axis development and early asymmetry in mammals. Cell 1999; 96: 195-209.
87. Lu CC, Brennan J, Robertson EJ. From fertilization to gastrulation: Axis formation in the mouse embryo. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2001; 11: 384-92.
88. Zernicka-Goetz M. Patterning of the embryo: The first spatial decisions in the life of a mouse. Development 2002; 129: 815-29.
89. Weber RJ, Pedersen RA, Wianny F, et al. Polarity of the mouse embryo is anticipated before implantation. Development 1999; 126: 5591-8.
90. Gardner RL. Polarity in early mammalian development. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1999; 9: 417-21.
91. Ciemerych MA, Mesnard D, Zernicka-Goetz M. Animal and vegetal poles of the mouse egg predict the polarity of the embryonic axis, yet are non essential for development. Development 2000; 127: 3467-74.
92. Piotrowska K, Zernicka-Goetz M. Early patterning of the mouse embryo. Contributions of sperm and egg. Development 2002; 129: 5803-13.
93. Edwards RG. Ovarian differentiation and human embryo quality. 1. Molecular and morphogenetic homologies between oocytes and embryos in Drosophila, C. elegans, Xenopus and mammals. Reprod Biomed Online 2001; 3: 138-60.
94. Piotrowska K, Zernicka-Goetz M. Role for sperm in spatial patterning of the early mouse embryo. Nature 2001; 409: 517-21.
95. Johnson MH. Mammalian development: Axes in the egg? Curr Biol 2001; 11: R281-4.
96. 2+ oscillations in fertilized mouse eggs. Dev Biol 2000; 218: 299-313.
97. 2+ signal regime on development. Development 2001; 128: 917-28.
98. Huxley JS. Problems of relative growth. New York: Dial Press, 1932.
99. Chabry LM. Contribution à l'embryologie normale et tératologique des ascidies simples. J Anat Physiol Norm Pathol 1887; 23: 167-321.
100. Driesch D. The potency of the first two cleavage cells in echinoderm development: Experimental production of partial and double formation. New York, Hafner, 1974: 1892.