Dual-process models of associative recognition in young and older adults: Evidence from receiver operating characteristics

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 768-788

  Healy, Michael R ^a,b,d   Light, Leah L ^b   Chung, Christie ^a,c  

^a CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PITZER COLLEGE   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d OTX Research Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Associative recognition; Dual process theories of memory; Memory and aging; Models of recognition memory; Recognition memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ATTENTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONG TERM MEMORY; MALE; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REVIEW; ROC CURVE; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); ROC CURVE; SIGNAL DETECTION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 23844552437     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.4.768     Document Type: Review

References (82)

1. Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B. N. Petrox & F. Caski (Eds.), Second International Symposium on Information Theory (pp. 267-281). Budapest, Hungary: Akademiai Kiado.
2. Arndt, J., & Reder, L. M. (2002). Word frequency and receiver operating characteristic curves in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 830-842.
3. Atkinson, R. C., & Juola, J. F. (1974). Search and decision processes in recognition memory. In D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, & P. Suppes (Eds.), Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology: Vol. 1. Learning, memory, and thinking (pp. 243-293). San Francisco: Freeman.
4. Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Duchek, J. M., Adams, D., Roediger, H. L., McDermott, K. B., & Yerys, B. E. (1999). Veridical and false memories in healthy older adults and in dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16, 361-384.
5. Benjamin, A. S. (2001). On the dual effects of repetition on false recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 941-947.
6. Benjamin, A. S., & Craik, F. I. M. (2001). Parallel effects of aging and time pressure on memory for source: Evidence from the spacing effect. Memory & Cognition, 29, 691-697.
7. Burke, D. M., & Light, L. L. (1981). Memory and aging: The role of retrieval processes. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 513-546.
8. Chalfonte, B. L., & Johnson, M. K. (1996). Feature memory and binding in young and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 24, 403-416.
9. Clark, S. E., & Gronlund, S. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 37-60.
10. Cleary, A. M., Curran, T., & Greene, R. L. (2001). Memory for detail in item versus associative recognition. Memory & Cognition, 29, 413-423.
11. Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 33(A), 497-505.
12. Davidson, P. S. R., & Glisky, E. L. (2002). Neuropsychological correlates of recollection and familiarity in normal aging. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 174-186.
13. Delis, D. C., Kramer, J. H., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B. A. (1987). California Verbal Learning Test: Adult version. New York: Psychological Corporation.
14. Erdfelder, E., & Buchner, A. (1998). Process-dissociation measurement models: Threshold theory or detection theory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 83-96.
15. Francis, W. N., & Kučera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
16. Gardiner, J. M. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective experience. Memory & Cognition, 16, 309-313.
17. Glanzer, M., Kim, K., Hilford, A., & Adams, J. K. (1999). Slope of the receiver-operating characteristic in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 500-513.
18. Harkins, S. W., Chapman, R. C., & Eisdorfer, C. (1979). Memory loss and response bias in senescence. Journal of Gerontology, 34, 66-72.
19. Heathcote, A. (2003). Item recognition memory and the receiver operating characteristic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1210-1230.
20. Hintzman, D. L. (1986). "Schema abstraction" in a multiple-trace memory model Psychological Review, 93, 411-428.
21. Hintzman, D. L., & Curran, T. (1994). Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 1-18.
22. Humphreys, M. S., Bain, J. D., & Pike, R. (1989). Different ways to cue a coherent memory system: A theory for episodic, semantic, and procedural tasks. Psychological Review, 96, 208-233.
23. Huyser, K., & van der Laan, J. (1994). dataThief (Version 2.0) [Computer software and manual]. Retrieved March 25, 2003, from http://www .nikhef.nl/~keeshu/datathief/
24. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
25. Jacoby, L. L. (1999). Ironic effect of repetition: Measuring age-related differences in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 3-22.
26. Jones, T. C., & Jacoby, L. L. (2001). Feature and conjunction errors in recognition memory: Evidence for dual-process theory. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 82-102.
27. Kelley, R., & Wixted, J. T. (2001). On the nature of associative information in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 701-722.
28. Kensinger, E. A., & Schacter, D. L. (1999). When true memories suppress false memories: Effects of ageing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16, 399-415.
29. Kijewski, M. F., Swensson, R. G., & Judd, P. F. (1989). Analysis of rating data from multiple-alternative tasks. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 33, 428-451.
30. Kliegl, R., & Lindenberger, U. (1993). Modeling intrusions and correct recall in episodic memory: Adult age differences in encoding of list context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 617-637.
31. Koutstaal, W., & Schacter, D. L. (1997). Gist-based false recognition of pictures in older and younger adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 555-583.
32. Koutstaal, W., Schacter, D. L., Galluccio, L., & Stofer, K. A. (1999). Reducing gist-based false alarms in older adults: Encoding and retrieval manipulations. Psychology and Aging, 14, 220-237.
33. La Voie, D. J., & Light, L. L. (1994). Adult age differences in repetition priming: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 9, 539-553.
34. Li, S.-C. (2002). Connecting the many levels and facets of cognitive aging. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 38-43.
35. Light, L. L. (1991). Memory and aging: Four hypotheses in search of data. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 333-376.
36. Light, L. L., Chung, C., Pendergrass, R., & Van Ocker, J. C. (in press). Effects of repetition and response deadline on item recognition in young and older adults. Memory & Cognition.
37. Light, L. L., Healy, M. R., Patterson, M. M., & Chung, C. (2005). Dual-process models of memory in young and older adults: Evidence from associative recognition. In L. Taconnat, D. Clarys, S. Vanneste, & M. Isingrini (Eds.), Manifestations cognitives du vieillissement psychologique: Actes des VIIèmes journées du vieillissement cognitif (pp. 95-116). Paris: Publibook.
38. Light, L. L., Patterson, M. M., Chung, C., & Healy, M. R. (2004). Effects of repetition and response deadline on associative recognition in young and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1182-1193.
39. Light, L. L., Prull, M. P., La Voie, D. J., & Healy, M. R. (2000). Dual-process theories of memory in old age. In T. J. Perfect & E. A. Maylor (Eds.), Models of cognitive aging (pp. 238-300). New York: Oxford University Press.
40. Macho, S. (2002). Cognitive modeling with spreadsheets. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 19-36.
41. Macho, S. (2004). Modeling associative recognition: A comparison of two-high-threshold, two-high-threshold signal detection, and mixture distribution models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 83-97.
42. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
43. Malmberg, K. J. (2002). On the form of ROCs constructed from confidence ratings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 380-387.
44. Malmberg, K. J., Zeelenberg, R., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2004). Turning up the noise or turning down the volume? On the nature of the impairment of episodic recognition memory by Midazolam. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 540-549.
45. Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252-271.
46. Multhaup, K. S. (1995). Aging, source, and decision criteria: When false fame errors do not occur. Psychology and Aging, 10, 492-497.
47. Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2000). Adult age differences in memory performance: Tests of an associative deficit hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1170-1187.
48. Naveh-Benjamin, M., Hussain, Z., Guez, J., & Bar-On, M. (2003). Adult age differences in episodic memory: Further support for an associative-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 826-837.
49. Nelson, M. J., & Denny, E. C. (1960). The Nelson-Denny Reading Test. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
50. Norman, K. A., & O'Reilly, R. C. (2003). Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: A complementary-learning- systems approach. Psychological Review, 110, 611-646.
51. Norman, K. A., & Schacter, D. L. (1997). False recognition in younger and older adults: Exploring the characteristics of illusory memories. Memory & Cognition, 25, 838-848.
52. Prull, M. W., Crandell, L. L., Martin, A. M., III, Backus, H. F., & Light, L. L. (2004). Recollection and familiarity in recognition memory: Adult age differences and neuropsychological test correlates. Manuscript submitted for publication.
53. Quamme, J. R., Frederick, C., Kroll, N. E. A., Yonelinas, A. P., & Dobbins, I. G. (2002). Recognition memory for source and occurrence: The importance of recollection. Memory & Cognition, 30, 893-907.
54. Raaijmakers, J. G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1992). Models for recall and recognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 205-234.
55. Ratcliff, R., Sheu, C.-F., & Gronlund, S. D. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychological Review, 99, 518-535.
56. Rotello, C. M., & Heit, E. (1999). Two-process models of recognition memory: Evidence for recall-to-reject? Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 432-453.
57. Rotello, C. M., & Heit, E. (2000). Associative recognition: A case of recall-to-reject processing. Memory & Cognition, 28, 907-922.
58. Rotello, C. M., Macmillan, N. A., & Van Tassel, G. (2000). Recall-to-reject in recognition: Evidence from ROC curves. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 67-88.
59. Salthouse, T. A. (1992). Influence of processing speed on adult age differences in working memory. Acta Psychologica, 79, 155-170.
60. Salthouse, T. A., Fristoe, N., & Rhee, S. H. (1996). How localized are age-related effects on neuropsychological measures? Neuropsychology, 10, 272-285.
61. Schacter, D. L., Osowiecki, D., Kaszniak, A. W., Kihlstrom, J. F., & Valdiserri, M. (1994). Source memory: Extending the boundaries of age-related deficits. Psychology and Aging, 9, 81-89.
62. Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (1999). Effects of divided attention and time course on automatic and controlled components of memory in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 14, 331-345.
63. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.
64. Simpson, A. J., & Fitter, M. J. (1973). What is the best index of detectability? Psychological Bulletin, 80, 481.
65. Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34-50.
66. Spencer, W. D., & Raz, N. (1995). Differential effects of aging on memory for content and context: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 10, 527-539.
67. Stretch, V., & Wixted, J. (1998). On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1379-1396.
68. Toth, J. P., & Parks, C. (in press). Effects of age on estimated familiarity in the process-dissociation procedure: The role of noncriterial recollection. Memory & Cognition.
69. Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology, 26, 1-12.
70. Tun, P. A., Wingfield, A., Rosen, M. J., & Blanchard, L. (1998). Response latencies for false memories: Gist-based processes in normal aging. Psychology and Aging, 13, 230-241.
71. Verde, M. F., & Rotello, C. M. (2003). Does familiarity change in the revelation effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 739-746.
72. Verhaeghen, P., Marcoen, A., & Goossens, L. (1993). Facts and fiction about memory aging: A quantitative integration of research findings. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 48, P157-P171.
73. Wickens, T. D. (2002). Elementary signal detection theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
74. Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 13411354.
75. Yonelinas, A. P. (1997). Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition, 25, 747-763.
76. Yonelinas, A. P. (2001). Components of episodic memory: The contribution of recollection and familiarity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 350, 1363-1374.
77. Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441-517.
78. Yonelinas, A. P., Dobbins, I., Szymanski, M. D., Dhaliwal, H. S., & King, L. (1996). Signal-detection, threshold, and dual-process models of recognition memory: ROCs and conscious recollection. Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 418-441.
79. Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (1995). The relation between remembering and knowing as bases for recognition: Effects of size congruency. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 622-643.
80. Yonelinas, A. P., Kroll, N. E. A., Dobbins, I. G., & Soltani, M. (1999). Recognition memory of faces: When familiarity supports associative recognition judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 654-661.
81. Yonelinas, A. P., Regehr, G., & Jacoby, L. L. (1995). Incorporating response bias in a dual-process theory of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 821-835.
82. Zacks, R. T., Hasher, L., & Li, K. Z. H. (2000). Human memory. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 293-357). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.