Cognitive modeling with spreadsheets

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 19-36

  Macho, Siegfried ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FRIBOURG   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; COGNITION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DECISION TREE; FOOD ALLERGY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEARNING; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; COGNITION; DATA DISPLAY; DECISION TREES; FOOD HYPERSENSITIVITY; HUMANS; LEARNING; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); SIGNAL DETECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SOFTWARE;

EID: 0036479526     PISSN: 07433808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03195420     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. BAKER, A. G., VALLÉE-TOURANGEAU, F., & MURPHY, R. A. (2000). Asymptotic judgment of cause in a relative validity paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 28, 466-479.
2. BATCHELDER, W. H., & RIEFER, D. M. (1990). Multinomial models of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548-564.
3. BAYEN, U. J., MURNANE, K., & ERDFELDER, E. (1996). Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 197-215.
4. BAYEN, U. J., NAKAMURA, G. V., DUPUIS, S. E., & YANG, C.-L. (2000). The use of schematic knowledge about sources in source monitoring. Memory & Cognition, 28, 480-500.
5. BUCHNER, A., ERDFELDER, E., & VATERRODT-PLÜNNECKE, B. (1995). Toward unbiased measurement of conscious and unconscious memory processes within the dissociation framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 137-160.
6. DECARLO, L. T. (1998). Signal detection theory and generalized linear models. Psychological Methods, 3, 186-205.
7. ERDFELDER, E., & BUCHNER, A. (1998a). Decomposing the hindsight bias: A multinomial processing tree model for separating recollection and reconstruction in hindsight bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 387-414.
8. ERDFELDER, E., & BUCHNER, A. (1998b). Process-dissociation measurement models: Threshold theory or detection theory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 83-96.
9. HU, X., & BATCHELDER, W. H. (1994). The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the EM algorithm. Psychometrica, 59, 21-47.
10. JACOBY, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Language & Memory, 30, 513-541.
11. KLAUER, K. C., & WEGENER, I. (1998). Unraveling social categorization in the "Who said what?" paradigm. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 75, 1155-1178.
12. KRUSCHKE, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99, 22-44.
13. MACHO, S. (in press). Kognitive Modellierung mit neuronalen Netzen: Eine praktisch orientierte Einführung [Cognitive modeling with neural networks: An applied introduction] (Freiburger Beiträge zur Psychologie). Bern: Hans Huber.
14. MACMILLAN, N. A., & CREELMAN, D. C. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. ORVIS, W. J. (1996). Excel for scientists and engineers. San Francisco: Sybex.
16. PEARCE, J. M. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61-73.
17. PEARCE, J. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 101, 587-607.
18. RATCLIFF, R., SHEU, C.-F., & GRONLUND, S. D. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychological Review, 99, 518-535.
19. RESCORLA, R. A., & WAGNER, A. R. (1972). A theory in Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. In A. H. Blach & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
20. RIEFER, D. M., & BATCHELDER. W. H. (1988). Multinomial modeling and the measurement of cognitive processes. Psychological Review, 95, 318-339.
21. SHANKS, D. R., CHARLES, D., DARBY, R. J., & AZMI, A. (1998). Configural processes in human associative learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1353-1378.
22. VALLÉE-TOURANGEAU, F., MURPHY, R.A., & BAKER, A. G. (1998).Causal induction in the presence of a perfect negative cue: Contrasting predictions from associative and statistical models. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51B, 173-191.
23. VALLÉE-TOURANGEAU, F., MURPHY, R. A., DREW, S., & BAKER, A. G. (1998). Judging the importance of constant and variable candidate causes: A test of the Power PC theory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 65-84.
24. VAN OVERWALLE, F., & ROOY, D. F. (1998). A connectionist approach to causal attribution. In S. J. Read & L. C. Miller (Eds.), Connectionist models of social reasoning and social behavior. (pp. 143-171). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. YONELINAS, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 1341-1354.
26. YONELINAS, A. P., & JACOBY, L. L. (1996). Response bias and the process-dissociation procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 422-434.