Recall-to-Reject in Recognition: Evidence from ROC Curves

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 67-88

  Rotello, Caren M ^a   MacMillan, Neil A ^b   Van Tassel, Gordon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Recognition; recall; recall to reject; ROC; time course

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002233199     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2701     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Atkinson R. C., Juola J. F. Factors influencing speed and accuracy of word recognition. Kornblum S. Attention and performance IV. 1973;583-612 Academic Press, New York.
2. Atkinson R. C., Juola J. F. Search and decision processes in recognition memory. Krantz D. H., Atkinson R. C., Luce R. D., Suppes P. Contemporary development in mathematical psychology: Learning, memory, and thinking. 1974;243-293 Freeman, New York.
3. Baranski J. V., Petrusic W. M. Probing the locus of confidence judgments: Experiments on the time to determine confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 24:1998;929-945.
4. Brockdorff N., Lamberts K. A feature-sampling account of the time-course of old-new recognition judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 26:2000;77-102.
5. Brown J., Lewis V. J., Monk A. F. Memorability, word frequency and negative recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 29:1977;461-473.
6. Clark S. E. Word frequency effects in associative and item recognition. Memory & Cognition. 20:1992;231-243.
7. Clark S. E., Burchett R. E. R. Word frequency and list composition effects in associative recognition and recall. Memory & Cognition. 22:1994;55-62.
8. Clark S. E., Gronlund S. D. Global matching models of memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 3:1996;37-60.
9. Dosher B. A. Discriminating preexperimental (semantic) information from learned (episodic) associations: A speed-accuracy study. Cognitive Psychology. 16:1984;519-555.
10. Gillund G., Shiffrin R. M. A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review. 91:1984;1-67.
11. Gronlund S. D., Ratcliff R. Time course of item and associative information: Implications for global memory models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 15:1989;846-858.
12. Hintzman D. L. Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review. 95:1988;528-551.
13. Hintzman D. L., Curran T. Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall. Journal of Memory and Language. 33:1994;1-18.
14. Jones C. M., Heit E. An evaluation of the total similarity principle: Effects of similarity on frequency judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 19:1993;799-812.
15. Kucera H., Francis W. N. Computational analysis of present-day American English. 1967;Brown Univ. Press, Providence.
16. Lamberts K. Categorization under time pressure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 124:1995;161-180.
17. Lamberts K. The time course of categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition. 24:1998;695-711.
18. McElree B., Dolan P. O., Jacoby L. L. Isolating the contributions of familiarity and source information to item recognition: A time-course analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 25:1999;563-582.
19. Macmillan N. A., Creelman C. D. Detection theory: A user's guide. 1991;Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
20. Mandler G. Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review. 87:1980;252-271.
21. Metz, C. E. 1998, ROCKIT computer program. Department of Radiology, University of Chicago. Available at, http://www-radiology.uchicago.edu/krl/toppage11.htm .
22. Murdock B. B. A theory of the storage and retrieval of item and associative information. Psychological Review. 89:1982;609-626.
23. Ratcliff R., McKoon G., Tindall M. Empirical generality of data from recognition memory receiver-operating characteristic functions and implications for the global memory models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 20:1994;763-785.
24. Rotello C. M. Metacognition and memory for nonoccurrence. Memory. 7:1999;43-63.
25. Rotello C. M., Heit E. Two-process models of recognition memory: Evidence for recall-to-reject? Journal of Memory and Language. 40:1999;432-453.
26. Rotello, C. M, &, Heit, E. in press, Associative recognition: A case of recall-to-reject processing, Memory & Cognition.
27. Yonelinas A. P. Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 20:1994;1341-1354.
28. Yonelinas A. P. Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition. 25:1997;747-763.
29. Yonelinas A. P., Kroll N. E. A., Dobbins I. G., Lazzara M., Knight R. T. Recollection and familiarity deficits in amnesia: Convergence of remember/know, process dissociation, and receiver operating characteristic data. Neuropsychology. 12:1998;1-17.