Ironic Effects of Repetition: Measuring Age-Related Differences in Memory

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 3-22

  Jacoby, Larry L ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; READING; RECALL; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); READING; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 0032611479     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.1.3     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Atkinson, R. C., & Juola, J. F. (1974). Search and decision processes in recognition memory. In D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce & P. Suppes (Eds.), Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology: Vol. 1. Learning, memory and thinking (pp. 243-293). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
2. Bartlett, J. C., Strater, L., & Fulton, A. (1991). False recency and false fame of faces in young adulthood and old age. Memory & Cognition, 19, 177-188.
3. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1990). Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548-564.
4. Bruck, M. L., & Ceci, S. J. (1995). Amicus brief for the case of State of New Jersey v. Michaels presented by Committee of Concerned Social Scientists. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 272-322.
5. Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., Steffens, M. C., & Martensen, H. (1997). The nature of memory processes underlying recognition judgments in the process dissociation procedure. Memory & Cognition, 25, 508-517.
6. Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., & Vaterrodt-Plünnecke, B. (1995). Toward unbiased measurement of conscious and unconscious memory processes within the process dissociation framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 137-160.
7. Camp, C. J., & Schaller, J. R. (1989). Epilogue: Spaced retrieval memory training in an adult day-care center. Educational Gerontology, 15, 641-648.
8. Cermak, L. S., Verfaellie, M., Butler, T., & Jacoby, L. L. (1993). Attributions of familiarity in amnesia: Evidence from a fame judgment task. Neuropsychology, 7, 510-518.
9. Clark, S. E., & Gronlund, S. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 37-60.
10. Cohen, G., & Faulkner, D. (1989). Age differences in source forgetting: Effects on reality monitoring and eyewitness testimony. Psychology and Aging, 4, 10-17.
11. Craik, F. I. M. (1982). Selective changes in encoding as a function of reduced processing capacity. In F. Klix, J. Hoffman, & E. van der Meer (Eds.), Cognitive research in psychology (pp. 152-161). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
12. Craik, F. I. M., & McDowd, J. M. (1987). Age differences in recall and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 474-479.
13. Curran, T., & Hintzman, D. L. (1995). Violations of the independence assumption in process dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 531-547.
14. Curran, T., & Hintzman, D. L. (1997). Consequences and causes of correlations in process dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 496-504.
15. Dosher, B. A. (1984). Discriminating preexperimental (semantic) from learned (episodic) associations: A speed-accuracy study. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 519-555.
16. Dywan, J., & Jacoby, L. L. (1990). Effects of aging on source monitoring: Differences in susceptibility to false fame. Psychology and Aging, 5, 379-387.
17. Dywan, J., Segalowitz, S. J., Henderson, D., & Jacoby, L. L. (1993). Memory for source after traumatic brain injury. Brain & Cognition, 21, 20-43.
18. Erdfelder, E., & Buchner, A. (1998). Process-dissociation measurement models: Threshold theory or detection theory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 83-96.
19. Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). G-power: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28, 1-11.
20. Foley, M. A., & Johnson, M. K. (1985). Confusions between memories for performed and imagined actions: A developmental comparison. Child Development, 56, 1145-1155.
21. Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67.
22. Graf, P., & Komatsu, S. (1994). Process dissociation procedure: Handle with caution! European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6, 113-129.
23. Harvey, P. D. (1985). Reality monitoring in mania and schizophrenia: The association of thought disorder and performance. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 173, 67-73.
24. Hashtroudi, S., Johnson, M. K., & Chrosniak, L. D. (1989). Aging and source monitoring. Psychology and Aging, 4, 106-112.
25. Hay, J. F., & Jacoby, L. L. (in press). Separating habit and recollection in young and elderly adults: Effects of elaborative processing and distinctiveness. Psychology and Aging.
26. Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95, 528-551.
27. Hintzman, D. L., & Curran, T. (1994). Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 1-18.
28. Hintzman, D. L., & Curran, T. (1997). More than one way to violate independence: Reply to Jacoby and Shrout (1997). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 511-513.
29. Hu, X. (1997). General Processing Tree Models (Version 0.99) [Computer software]. Memphis, TN: University of Memphis. (Available on the World Wide Web: http://xhuoffice.psyc. memphis.edu/gpt/index.htm)
30. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
31. Jacoby, L. L. (1998). Invariance in automatic influences of memory: Toward a user's guide for the process-dissociation procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 3-26.
32. Jacoby, L. L. (in press). Deceiving the elderly: Effects of accessibility bias in cued-recall performance. Cognitive Neuropsychology.
33. Jacoby, L. L., Begg, I. M., & Toth, J. P. (1997). In defense of functional independence: Violations of assumptions underlying the process-dissociation procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 484-495.
34. Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 3, 306-340.
35. Jacoby, L. L., Jones, T. J., & Dolan, P. O. (in press). Two effects of repetition: Support for a dual-process model of Know judgments and exclusion errors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
36. Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., Brown, J., & Jasechko, J. (1989). Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences of the past. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 326-338.
37. Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., & McElree, B. (in press). The role of cognitive control: Early selection vs. late correction. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford.
38. Jacoby, L. L., & Shrout, P. E. (1997). Toward a psychometric analysis of violations of the independence assumption in process dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 505-510.
39. Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., & Yonelinas, A. P. (1993). Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 139-154.
40. Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., Yonelinas, A. P., & Debner, J. A. (1994). The relationship between conscious and unconscious influences: Independence or redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 216-219.
41. Jacoby, L. L., Woloshyn, V., & Kelley, C. M. (1989). Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 115-125.
42. Jacoby, L. L., Yonelinas, A. P., & Jennings, J. M. (1997). The relation between conscious and unconscious (automatic) influences: A declaration of independence. In J. D. Cohen & J. W. Schooler (Eds.), Scientific approaches to consciousness. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Jennings, J. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1993). Automatic versus intentional uses of memory: Aging, attention, and control. Psychology and Aging, 8, 283-293.
44. Jennings, J. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1997). An opposition procedure for detecting age-related deficits in recollection: Telling effects of repetition. Psychology and Aging, 12, 352-361.
45. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
46. Johnson, M. K., Kounios, J., & Reeder, J. A. (1994). Time-course studies of reality monitoring and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1409-1419.
47. Joordens, S., & Merikle, P. M. (1993). Independence or redundancy? Two models of conscious and unconscious influences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 462-467.
48. Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
49. Light, L. L., La Voie, D., Valencia-Laver, D., Albertson-Owens, S. A., & Mead, G. (1992). Direct and indirect measures of memory for modality in young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1284-1297.
50. Lindsay, D. S., & Johnson, M. K. (1989). The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source. Memory & Cognition, 17, 349-358.
51. Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252-271.
52. McElree, B., Dolan, P. O., & Jacoby, L. L. (in press). Isolating the contributions of familiarity and source information to item recognition: A time-course analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
53. McIntyre, J. S., & Craik, F. I. M. (1987). Age differences in memory for item and source information. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 175-192.
54. Mitchell, D. B., Hunt, R. R., & Schmitt, F. A. (1988). The generation effect and reality monitoring: Evidence for dementia and normal aging. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 79-84.
55. Mulligan, N. W., & Hirshman, E. (1997). Measuring the bases of recognition memory: An investigation of the process-dissociation framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 280-304.
56. Multhaup, K. S. (1995). Aging, source, and decision criteria: When false fame errors do and do not occur. Psychology and Aging, 10, 492-497.
57. Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information. Psychological Review, 89, 609-626.
58. Murnane, K., & Bayen, U. J. (1996). An evaluation of empirical measures of source identification. Memory & Cognition, 24, 417-428.
59. Rabinowitz, J. C. (1984). Aging and recognition failure. Journal of Gerontology, 39, 65-71.
60. Ratcliff, R., Van Zandt, T., & McKoon, G. (1995). Process dissociation, single-process theories, and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 352-374.
61. Richardson-Klavehn, A., Gardiner, J. M., & Java, R. I. (1996). Memory: Task dissociations, process dissociations and dissociations of consciousness. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Implicit cognition (pp. 85-158). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
62. Riefer, D. M., & Batchelder, W. (1988). Multinomial modeling and the measurement of cognitive processes. Psychological Review, 95, 318-339.
63. Salthouse, T. (1996). The processing speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403-429.
64. Schacter, D. L., Kagan, J., & Leichtman, M. D. (1995). True and false memories in children and adults: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 411-428.
65. Schacter, D. L., Koutstaal, W., Johnson, M. K., Gross, M. S., & Angell, K. E. (1997). False recollection induced by photographs: A comparison of older and younger adults. Psychology and Aging, 12, 203-215.
66. Schacter, D. L., Norman, K. A., & Koutstaal, W. (1998). The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 289-318.
67. Schneider, W. (1990). Micro Experimental Laboratory (Version 1.0) [Computer software]. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
68. Spencer, W. D., & Raz, N. (1995). Differencial effects of aging on memory for content and context: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 10, 527-539.
69. Squire, L. R., & McKee, R. (1992). Influence of prior events on cognitive judgments in amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 106-115.
70. Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101, 34-52.
71. Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Dissociations of processes in recognition memory: Effects of interference and of response speed. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 516-534.
72. Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (1995). Dissociating automatic and controlled processes in a memory-search task: Beyond implicit memory. Psychological Research, 57, 156-165.
73. Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (1996). Response bias and the process dissociation procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 422-439.
74. Yonelinas, A. P., Kroll, N. E. A., Dobbins, J., Lazzara, M., & Knight, R. T. (1998). Recollection and familiarity deficits in amnesia: Convergence of remember-know, process dissociation, and receiver operating characteristics data. Neuropsychology, 12, 323-339.