Skin irritation and corrosion

ATLA Alternatives to Laboratory Animals

Volumn 33, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2005, Pages 35-46

  Zuang, Valérie ^a   Alonso, Marie Ange ^b   Botham, Philip A ^c   Eskes, Chantra ^a   Fentem, Julia ^d   Liebsch, Manfred ^e   Van De Sandt, Johannes J M ^f  

^a JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^b EVIC France   (France)

^c JEALOTT S HILL INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^d UNILEVER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^e FEDERAL INSTITUTE FOR RISK ASSESSMENT   (Germany)

^f TNO   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COSMETIC;

ACUTE TOXICITY; ANIMAL TESTING ALTERNATIVE; CELL GROWTH; CELL VIABILITY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CORROSION; ELECTRIC RESISTANCE; EXPLANT; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; MODEL; PH MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; SAFETY; SKIN CULTURE; SKIN IRRITATION; SKIN WATER LOSS; STANDARDIZATION; TOXICITY TESTING; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 22844432717     PISSN: 02611929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/026119290503301s08     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. OECD (2002). OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals No. 404: Acute Dermal Irritation/Corrosion, 13pp. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
2. Botham, P.A., Earl, L.K., Fentem, J.H., Roguet, R. & van de Sandt, J.J.M. (1998). Alternative methods for skin irritation testing: the current status. ECVAM Skin Irritation Task Force Report 1. ATLA 26, 195-211.
3. Zuang, V., Balls, M., Botham, P.A., Coquette, A., Corsini, E., Curren, R.D., Elliott, G.R., Fentem, J.H., Heylings, J.R., Liebsch, M., Medina, J., Roguet, R., van de Sandt, H., Wiemann, C. & Worth, A.P. (2002). Follow-up to the ECVAM Prevalidation Study on In vitro Tests for Acute Skin Irritation. ECVAM Skin Irritation Task Force Report 2. ATLA 30, 109-129.
4. van de Sandt, J., Roguet, R., Cohen, C., Esdaile, D., Ponec, M., Corsini, E., Barker, C., Fusenig, N., Liebsch, M., Benford, D., de Brugerolle de Fraissinette, A. & Fortasch, M. (1999). The use of keratinocytes and human skin models for predicting skin irritation. ATLA 27, 723-743.
5. Fentem, J.H., Briggs, D., Chesné, C., Elliott, G.R., Harbell, J.W., Heylings, J.R., Portes, P., Roguet, R., van de Sandt, J.J.M. & Botham, P.A. (2001). A prevalidation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation: results and evaluation by the Management Team. Toxicology in Vitro 15, 57-93.
6. Fentem, J.H. & Botham, P.A. (2002). ECVAMs activities in validating alternative tests for skin corrosion and irritation. ATLA 30, Suppl. 2, 61-67.
7. ECD (2001). Harmonised Integrated Classification System for Human Health and Environmental Hazards of Chemical Substances and Mixtures. OECD series on testing and assessment, 249pp. Paris. France: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
8. Robinson, M.K., Osborne, R. & Perkins, M.A. (2000). In vitro and human testing strategies for skin irritation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 919, 192-04.
9. Basketter, D.A., Chamberlain, M., Griffiths, H.A., Rowson, M., Whittle, E. & York, M. (1997). The classification of skin irritants by human patch test. Food and Chemical Toxicology 35, 845-52.
10. COLIPA (1995). Cosmetic Product Test Guidelines for the Assessment of Human Skin Compatibility, 22pp. Brussels, Belgium: COLIPA.
11. COLPIA (1997). Test Guidelines for the Assessment of Human Skin Tolerance of Potentially Irritant Cosmetic Ingredients, 17pp. Brussels, Belgium: COLIPA.
12. Portes, P., Grandidier, M-H., Cohen, C. & Roguet, R. (2002). Refinement of the EPISKIN™ protocol for the assessment of acute skin irritation of chemicals: follow-up to the ECVAM prevalidation study. Toxicology in Vitro 16, 765-770.
13. Heylings, J.R., Diot, S., Esdaile, D.J., Fasano, W.J., Manning, L.A. & Owen, H.M. (2003). A prevalidation study on the in vitro skin irritation function test (SIFT) for prediction of acute skin irritation in vivo: results and evaluation of ECVAM Phase III. Toxicology in Vitro 17, 123-138.
14. Faller, C., Bracher, M., Dami, N. & Roguet, R. (2002). Predictive ability of reconstructed human epidermis equivalents for the assessment of skin irritation of cosmetics. Toxicology in Vitro 16, 557-572.
15. Ponec, M. & Kempenaar, J. (1995). Use of human skin recombinants as an in vitro model for testing the irritation potential of cutaneous irritants. Skin Pharmacology 8, 49-59.
16. Tinois, E., Tillier, J., Gaucherand, M., Dumas, H., Tardy, M. & Thivolet J. (1991). In vitro and posttransplantation differentiation of human keratinocytes grown on the human type IV collagen film of a bilayered dermal substitute. Experimental Cell Research 193, 310-319.
17. Roguet, R., Cohen, C., Dossou, K.G. & Rougier, A. (1994). EPISKIN, a reconstituted epidermis for assessing in vitro the irritancy of topically applied compounds. Toxicology in Vitro 8, 49-59.
18. Roguet, R., Cohen, C., Robles, C., Courtellemont, P., Tolle, M., Guillot, J.P. & Duteil, X. (1998). An interlaboratory study of the reproducibility and relevance of EPISKIN™, a reconstructed human epidermis, in the assessment of cosmetics irritancy. Toxicology in Vitro 12, 295-304.
19. Cannon, C.L., Neal, P.J., Southee, J.A., Kubilus, J. & Klausner, M. (1994). New epidermal model for dermal irritancy testing. Toxicology in Vitro 8, 889-891.
20. Earl, L.K., Hall-Manning, T.J. & Holland, G.H. (1999). The determination of acute chemically induced skin irritation using a human skin model. In Alternatives to Animal Testing II. Proceedings of the Second International Scientific Conference Organised by the European Cosmetic Industry (ed. D.G. Clark, S.G. Lisansky & R. Macmillan), 227pp. Newbury, UK: CPL Press.
21. Rosdy, M. & Clauss L.C. (1990). Complete human epidermal cell differentiation in chemical defined medium at the air-liquid interface on inert filter substrates. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 95, 409-414.
22. de Brugerolle de Fraissinette, A., Picarles, V., Chibout, S., Kolopp, M., Medina, J., Burtin, P., Ebelin, M.E., Osborne, S., Mayer, F.K., Spake, A., Rosdy, M., De Wever, B., Ettlin, R.A. & Cordier A. (1999). Predictivity of an in vitro model for acute and chronic skin irritation (SkinEthic) applied to the testing of topical vehicles. Cell Biology and Toxicology 15, 121-135.
23. Robinson, M.K., Cohen, C., de Brugerolle de Fraissinette, A., Ponec, M., Whittle, E. & Fentem, J.H. (2000). Non-animal testing strategies for assessment of the skin corrosion and skin irritation potential of ingredients and finished products. Food and Chemical Toxicology 40, 573-592.
24. Boelsma, E., Tanojo, H., Boddé, H. & Ponec, M. (1996). Assessment of the potential irritancy of oleic acid on human skin: evaluation in vitro and in vivo. Toxicology in Vitro 10, 729-742.
25. Boelsma, E., Gibbs, S., Faller, C. & Ponec, M. (2000). Characterization and comparison of reconstructed skin models: morphological and immunohistochemical evaluation. Acta Dermato-Venerologica 80, 82-88.
26. Medina, J., de Brugerolle de Fraissinette, A., Chibout, S.D., Kolopp, M., Kammermann, R., Burtin, P., Ebelin, M.E. & Cordier, A. (2000). Use of human skin equivalent Apligraf for in vitro assessment of cumulative skin irritation potential of topical products. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 164, 38-45.
27. Heylings, J.R., Clowes, H.M. & Hughes, L. (2001). Comparison of tissue sources for the skin integrity function test (SIFT). Toxicology in Vitro 13, 597-600.
28. Cronin, M.T.D, Dearden J.C., Walker, J.D. & Worth, A.P. (2003). Quantitative structure-activity relationships for human health effects: commonalities with other endpoints. Environmental and Toxicological Chemistry 22, 1829-1843.
29. Hulzebos, E.M., Maslankiewicz, L. & Walker, J.D. (2003). Verification of literature-derived SARs for skin irritation and corrosion. QSAR and Combinatorial Science 22, 351-363.
30. Patlewicz, G., Rodford, R. & Walker, J.D. (2003). QSARs for predicting skin and eye irritation. Environmental & Toxicological Chemistry 22, 1862-1869.
31. Barratt, M.D. (1996). Quantitative structure-activity relationships for skin irritation and corrosivity of neutral and electrophilic organic chemicals. Toxicology in Vitro 10, 247-256.
32. Hayashi, H., Nakamura, Y., Higashi, K., Kato, H., Kishida, F. & Kaneko, H. (1999). A quantitative structure-activity relationship study of the skin irritation potential of phenols. Toxicology in Vitro 13, 915-922.
33. Smith, J.S., Macina, O.T., Sussman, N.B., Luster, M.I. & Karol, M.H. (2000). A robust structure-activity relationship (SAR) model for esters that cause skin irritation in humans. Toxicological Sciences 55, 215-222.
34. Cronin, M.T.D., Jaworska, J.S., Walker, J.D., Comber, M.H.I., Watts, C.D. & Worth, A.P. (2003). Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict health effects of chemical substances. Environmental Health Perspectives 10, 1391-1402.
35. Gerner, I., Graetschel, G., Kahl, J. & Schlede, E. (2000). Development of a decision support system for the introduction of alternative methods into local irritancy/corrositivity testing strategies. Development of a relational database. ATLA 28, 11-28.
36. Gerner, I., Zinke, S., Graetschel, G. & Schlede, E. (2000). Development of a decision support system for the introduction of alternative methods into local irritancy/corrosivity testing strategies. Creation of fundamental rules for a decision support system. ATLA 28, 665-698.
37. Zinke, S., Gerner, I. & Schlede, E. (2000). Local irritation/corrosion testing strategies: development of a decision support system for the introduction of alternative methods. ATLA 28, 29-40.
38. Fentem, J.H., Archer, G.E.B., Balls, M., Botham, P.A., Curren, R.D., Earl, L.K., Esdaile, D.J., Holzhütter, H.G. & Liebsch, M. (1998). The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for skin corrosivity. 2. Results and evaluation by the Management Team. Toxicology in Vitro 12, 483-524.
39. Liebsch, M., Traue, D., Barrabas, C., Spielmann, H., Uphill, P., Wilkins, S., Wiemann, C., Kaufmann, T., Remmele, M. & Holzhütter, H.G. (2000). The ECVAM prevalidation study on the use of EpiDerm for skin corrosivity testing. ATLA 28, 371-401.
40. ECVAM (1998). Statement on the scientific validity of the EPISKIN™ test (an in vitro test for skin corrosivity). ATLA 26, 277-280.
41. ECVAM (1998). Statement on the scientific validity of the rat skin transcutaneous electrical resistance (TER) test (an in vitro test for skin corrosivity). ATLA 26, 275-277.
42. ECVAM (2000). Statement on the application of the Epiderm™ human skin model for skin corrosivity testing. ATLA 28, 365-366.
43. EU (2000). Annex I to Commission Directive 2000/33/EC adapting to technical progress for the 27th time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances. Official Journal of the European Union L136, 91-97.
44. ECVAM (2001). Statement on the application of the CORROSITEX® assay for skin corrosivity testing. ATLA 29, 96-97.
45. NIH (1999). Corrositex®: an in vitro test method for assessing dermal corrosivity potential of chemicals. NIH Publication No. 99-4495, 236pp. Research Triangle Park, NC, USA: NIEHS.
46. Barratt, M.D. (1996). Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for skin corrosivity of organic acids, bases and phenols: principal components and neural network analysis of extended datasets. Toxicology in Vitro 10, 85-94.
47. Whittle, E.G., Barratt, M.D., Carter, J.A., Basketter, D.A. & Chamberlain, M. (1996). The skin corrosivity potential of fatty acids: in vitro rat and human skin testing and QSAR studies. Toxicology in Vitro 10, 95-100.
48. Barratt, M.D., Brantom, P.G., Fentem, J.H., Gerner, I., Walker, A.P. & Worth, A.P. (1998). The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for skin corrosivity. 1. Selection and distribution of the test chemicals. Toxicology in Vitro 12, 471-482.
49. Barratt, M.D., Dixit, M.B. & Jones, P.A. (1996). The use of in vitro cytotoxicity measurements in QSAR methods for the prediction of the skin corrosivity potential of acids. Toxicology in Vitro 10, 283-290.
50. Worth A.P. (2000). The Integrated Use of Physicochemical and In Vitro Data for Predicting Chemical Toxicity. PhD Thesis, 369pp. Liverpool John Moores University, UK.
51. Worth, A.P. & Cronin, M.T.D. (2001). The use of bootstrap resampling to assess the uncertainty of Cooper statistics. ATLA 29, 447-459.
52. Worth, A.P., Fentem, J.H., Balls, M., Botham, P.A., Curren, R.D., Earl, L.K., Esdaile, D.J. & Liebsch, M. (1998). An evaluation of the proposed OECD testing strategy for skin corrosion. ATLA 26, 709-720.
53. Worth, A.P. & Cronin, M.T.D. (2001). The use of pH measurements to predict the potential of chemicals to cause acute dermal and ocular toxicity. Toxicology 169, 119-131.
54. EU (2004). Annex 2D to Commission Directive 2004/73/EC adapting to technical progress for the 29th time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances.
55. NIH (2002). ICCVAM evaluation of EPISKIN™, EpiDerm™ (EPI-200), and the rat skin transcutaneous electrical resistance (TER) assay: in vitro test methods for assessing dermal corrosivity potential of chemicals. NIH Publication No. 02-4502, 196pp. Research Triangle Park, NC, USA: NIEHS.
56. OECD (2002). OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals No. 430. In vitro Skin Corrosion: Transcutaneous Electrical Resistance Test (TER), 12pp. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
57. OECD (2002). OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals No. 431. In vitro Skin Corrosion: Human Skin Model Test, 8pp. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
58. ICCVAM (2002). OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. Proposal for a new guideline. In vitro membrane barrier test system for skin corrosion, 16pp. NC, USA: ICCVAM, NIEHS.