Effects of constructivist-oriented instruction on elementary school students' cognitive structures

Journal of Biological Education

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 113-119

  Wu, Ying Tien ^a,b   Tsai, Chin Chung ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Biological reproduction; Cognitive structure; Constructivist; Flow map; Taiwan

Indexed keywords

EID: 22244490637     PISSN: 00219266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00219266.2005.9655977     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Alparslan C, Tekkaya C and Geban O (2003) Using the conceptual change instruction to improve learning. Journal of Biological Education, 37(3), 135-139.
2. Anderson O R (1997). A neurocognitive perspective on current learning theory and science instructional strategies. Science Education, 81(1), 67-89.
3. Anderson O R and Demetrius O J (1993) A flow-map method of representing cognitive structure based on respondents' narrative using science content. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 953-969.
4. Ausubel D P (1968) Educational psychology: A cognitive viewpoint. New York: Rinehart & Winston.
5. Bean T W, Searles D, Singer H and Cowen S (2001). Learning concepts from biology text through pictorial analogies and an analogical study guide. Journal of Educational Research, 83(4), 233-237.
6. Bettencourt A (1993) The construction of knowledge: A radical constructivist view. In K. Tobin (ed), The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education (pp 39-50). Hillsdale, New Jersey: LEA.
7. Bodner G M (1996). Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 63(10), 873-878.
8. Bischoff P J and Anderson O R (2001) Development of knowledge frameworks and higher order cognitive operations among secondary school students who studied a unit on ecology. Journal of Biological Education, 35(2), 81-88.
9. Christianson R G and Fisher K M (1999) Comparison of student learning about diffusion and osmosis in constructivist and traditional classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 21(6), 687-698.
10. Cohen J (1998) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science (2nd Ed). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence.
11. Driver R, Asoko H, Leach J, Mortimer E and Scott P (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12.
12. Driver R and Bell B (1986) Students' thinking and the learning of science: A constructivist view. School Science Review, 67(240), 443-456.
13. Fosnot C T (1996) Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In: C T Fosnot (ed), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives and practice, (pp 3-7). New York: Teachers College Press.
14. Kearney M, Treagust D F, Yeo S and Zadnik M G (2001) Student and teacher perceptions of the use of multimedia supported predict-observe-explain tasks to probe understanding. Research in Science Education, 31, 589-615.
15. Kinchin I M (2000). Concept mapping in biology. Journal of Biological Education. 34(2), 61-68.
16. Lawson A E (2001) Using the learning cycle to teach biology concepts and reasoning patterns. Journal of Biological Education, 35(4), 165-169.
17. Liew C W.(1995). A predict-observe-explain teaching sequence for learning about students' understanding of heat and expansion of liquid. Australian Science Teachers' Journal, 41(1), 68-71.
18. Marinopoulos D and Stavridou H (2002) The influence of a collaborative learning environment on primary students' conceptions about acid rain. Journal of Biological Education, 37(1), 18-24.
19. Matthews M R (2002) Constructivism and science education: A further appraisal. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(2), 121-134.
20. Mintzes J J (2001) Prior knowledge and locus of control in cognitive learning among college biology students. Education, 100(2), 138-145.
21. Mintzes J J, Wandersee J H and Novak J D (1998) Teaching Science for Understanding. London: Academic Press.
22. Mintzes J J, Wandersee J H and Novak J D (2001) Assessing understanding in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 35(3), 118-124.
23. Odom A L and Kelly P V (2001) Integrating concept mapping and learning cycle to teach diffusion and osmosis concepts to high school biology students. Science Education, 85, 615-635.
24. Palmer D (1995) The POE in the primary school: An evaluation. Research in Science Education, 25(3), 323-332.
25. Pines A L (1985) Toward a taxonomy of conceptual relations and the implications for the evaluation of cognitive structures. In: L H T West and A L Pines (eds), Cognitive structures and conceptual change, (pp 101-115). Orlando: Academic Press.
26. Schmid R F and Telaro G. (1990) Concept mapping as an instructional strategy for high school biology. Journal of Educational Research, 84(2), 78-85.
27. Shavelson R J (1974) Methods for examining representations of a subject-matter structure in a student's memory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11, 231-249.
28. Staver J R (1998) Constructivism: Sound theory for explicating the practice of science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(5), 501-520.
29. Soyibo K and Evans H G (2002) Effects of co-operative learning strategy on ninth-graders' understanding of human nutrition. Australian Science Teachers' Journal, 48(2), 32-35.
30. Tsai C-C (1998) An analysis of scientific epistemological beliefs and learning orientation of Taiwan eighth graders. Science Education, 82, 473-489.
31. Tsai C-C (1999) 'Laboratory exercise help me memorize the scientific truths': A case study of eighth graders' scientific epistemological views and learning in laboratory activities. Science Education, 83, 654-674.
32. Tsai C-C (2001) Probing students' cognitive structures in science: The use of a flow map method coupled with a metalistening technique. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 27, 257-268.
33. Tsai C-C (2003) Using a 'conflict map' as an instructional tool to change student alternative conceptions in simple series electric-circuits. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 307-327
34. Tsai C-C and Huang C-M (2001) Development of cognitive structures and information processing strategies of elementary school students learning about biological reproduction. Journal of Biological Education, 36, 21-26.
35. Tsai C-C and Huang C-M (2002) Exploring students' cognitive structures in learning science: A review of relevant methods. Journal of Biological Education, 36, 163-169.
36. Taylor P C and Fisher B J (1991) CLES: An instrument for assessing constructivist learning environments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Lake Geneva, WI.
37. West L H T, Fensham P J and Garrard J E (1985) Describing the cognitive structures of learners following instruction in chemistry. In: L H T West and A L Pines (eds), Cognitive structures and conceptual change, (pp 29-48). Orlando: Academic Press.
38. White R and Gunstone R (1992) Prediction-observation-explanation. In: R White and R Gunstone (eds), Probing understanding, (pp 44-64). London: The Falmer Press.