Can 'the public' be considered as a fourth helix in university-industry-government relations? Report on the Fourth Triple Helix Conference, 2002

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 55-61

  Leydesdorff, Loet ^a   Etzkowitz, Henry ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

STATE-BUSINESS RELATIONS; UNIVERSITY SECTOR;

EID: 0037967292     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/147154303781780678     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Arrow, K J (1974). The Limits of Organization (W W Norton, New York).
2. Ashby, R (1958). "Requisite variety and its implications for the control of complex systems", Cybemetica, 1(2), pages 1-17.
3. Berg, Per Olof, Anders Linde-Laursen and Orvar Löfgren (2000), Invoking a Transnational Metropolis: The Making of the Øresund Region (Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen).
4. Berger, P L, and T Luckmann (1966), The Social Construction of Reality: a Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (Doubleday, Garden City).
5. Commission of the European Communities (2001), Science and Society Action Plan, Communication from the Commission to the Council. The European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Brussels, 4 December.
6. Cutcliffe, S H (2000), Ideas, Machines, and Values: an Introduction to Science, Technology and Society Studies (Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham MD).
7. Etzkowitz, H. and M Gulbrandsen (1999). "Public entrepreneur: the trajectory of United States science, technology and industrial policy", Science and Public Policy, 26(1), pages 53-62.
8. Etzkowitz, H, and L Leydesdorff (1998), "The endless transition: a 'Triple Helix' of university-industry-government relations". Minerva, 36, pages 203-208.
9. Etzkowitz, H, and L Leydesdorff (2000), "The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and 'Mode 2' to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations", Research Policy, 29(2), pages 109-123.
10. Etzkowitz, H. J Mello and M Almeida (forthcoming), "Evolution of the incubator: the emergence of civil society and the transformation of science and technology in Brazil", Research Policy, under review.
11. Farkas, N E (2002), Bread, Cheese, and Expertise: Dutch science shops and democratic institutions, unpublished PhD Thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.
12. Gibbons, M, C Limoges, H Nowotny, S Schwartzman, P Scott and M Trow (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (Sage, London).
13. Giere, R (1999), Science Without Laws: Science and Its Conceptual Foundations (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
14. Hull, D L (1988), Science as a Process: an Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
15. Hull, D L (2001), Science and Selection: Essays on Biological Evolution and the Philosophy of Science (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
16. Krugman, P (1996), The Self-Organizing Economy (Blackwell, Malden MA and Oxford).
17. Latour, B, and P Weibel (2002). ICONOCLASH: Beyond the Image Wars in Science, Religion and Art (MIT Press, Cambridge MA).
18. Leydesdorff, L, P Cooke and M Olazaran (2002), "Technology transfer in European regions", Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), pages 5-13.
19. Leydesdorff, L, and H Etzkowitz (1998), "The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies", Science and Public Policy, 25(3), pages 195-203.
20. Lloyd, E A (1988), The Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory (Greenwood Press, New York).
21. Luhmann, N (1984), Soziale Systeme. Grundriβ einer aligemeinen Theorie (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a M).
22. Lundvall, B-Å (editor) (1992), National Systems of Innovation (Pinter, London).
23. Malerba, F, R Nelson, L Orsenigo and S Winter (1999), "'History-friendly' models of industry evolution: the computer industry", Industrial and Corporate Change, 8(1), pages 3-35.
24. Nelson, R R (editor) (1993), National Innovation Systems: a comparative analysis (Oxford University Press, New York).
25. Nelson, R R, and S G Winter (1975). "Growth theory from an evolutionary perspective: the differential productivity growth puzzle", American Economic Review, 65, pages 338-344.
26. Nelson, R R, and S G Winter (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA).
27. Neurath, O (1932/1933), "Protokollsātze", Erkenntnis, 3, pages 204-214.
28. Nowotny, H, P Scott and M Gibbons (2001), Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty (Polity, Cambridge).
29. Saxenian, A (1994), Regional Advantage: culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (Harvard University Press, Boston MA).
30. Schumpeter, J (1943), Socialism, Capitalism and Democracy (Allen and Unwin, London).
31. Shinn, T (2002), "The Triple Helix and new production of knowledge : prepackaged thinking on science and technology", Social Studies of Science, 32(4), pages 599-614.
32. Skolnikoff, E B (1993), The Elusive Transformation (Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ).
33. Whitley, R D (1984), The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
34. Wouters, P, J Annerstedt and L Leydesdorff (1999). The European Guide to Science, Technology, and Innovation Studies (European Commission, Brussels, DG XII) available at , last accessed 11 February 2003.
35. Ziman, J (2000a), Real Science: what it is and what it means? (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
36. Ziman, J (editor) (2000b), Technological Innovation as an Evolutionary Process (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).