Hybridization and postzygotic isolation patterns in pigeons and doves

Evolution

Volumn 57, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 1411-1418

  Lijtmaer, Darío A ^a   Mahler, Bettina ^a   Tubaro, Pablo L ^a  

^a MUSEO ARGENTINO DE CIENCIAS NATURALES BERNARDINO RIVADAVIA   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Columbidae; Divergence; Haldane's rule; Inviability; Speciation

Indexed keywords

HYBRIDIZATION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ANAS; ANIMALIA; ANURA; AVES; COLUMBA; COLUMBIDAE; COLUMBIFORMES; DROSOPHILA; LEPIDOPTERA;

EID: 0038641071     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00348.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Adachi, J., Y. Cao, and M. Hasegawa. 1993. Tempo and mode of mitochondrial DNA evolution in vertebrates at the amino acid sequence level: rapid evolution in warm-blooded vertebrates. J. Mol. Evol. 36:270-281.
2. Baptista, L. F., P. W. Trail, and H. M. Horblit. 1997. Order Columbiformes, Pp. 60-243 in J. del Hoyo, A. Elliot, and J. Sargatal, eds. Handbook of the birds of the world. Vol. 4. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, Spain.
3. Britten, R. J. 1986. Rates of DNA sequence evolution differ between taxonomic groups. Science 231:1393-1398.
4. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1989a. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43:362-381.
5. _. 1989b. Two rules of speciation. Pp. 180-207 in D. Otte, and J. A. Endler, eds. Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
6. _. 1997. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila revisited. Evolution 51:295-303.
7. Dobzhansky, T. 1936. Studies on hybrid sterility. II. Localization of sterility factors in Drosophila pseudoobscura hybrids. Genetics 21:113-135.
8. _. 1937. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
9. Felsenstein, J. 1999. PHYLIP (Phylogeny inference package) Ver. 3.5c. Available from the author. Dept. of Genetics, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA.
10. Fitzpatrick, B. M. 2002. Molecular correlates of reproductive isolation. Evolution 56:191-198.
11. Gibbs, D., E. Barnes, and J. Cox. 2001. Pigeons and doves: a guide to the pigeons and doves of the world. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT, and London.
12. Grant, P. R., and B. R. Grant. 1992. Hybridization of bird species. Science 256:193-197.
13. _. 1997. Genetics and the origin of bird species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:7768-7775.
14. Haldane, J. B. S. 1922. Sex ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals. J. Genet. 12:101-109.
15. Hall, T. A. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl. Acids. Symp. Ser. 41:95-98.
16. Johnson, K. P., and D. H. Clayton. 2000a. A molecular phylogeny of the dove genus Zenaida: mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Condor 102:864-870.
17. _. 2000b. Nuclear and mitochondrial genes contain similar phylogenetic signal for pigeons and doves (Aves: Columbiformes). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 14:141-151.
18. Johnson, K. P., S. de Kort, K. Dinwoodey, A. C. Mateman, C. ten Cate, C. M. Lessells, and D. H. Clayton. 2001. A molecular phylogeny of the dove genera Streptopelia and Columba. Auk 118:874-887.
19. Johnson, N. A. 2000. Speciation: Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities, dominance and gene interactions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:480-482.
20. Laurie, C. C. 1997. The weaker sex is heterogametic: 75 years of Haldane's rule. Genetics: 147:937-951.
21. Martin, A. P., and S. R. Palumbi. 1993. Body size, metabolic rate, generation time, and the molecular clock. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:4087-4091.
22. Mindell, D. P., A. Knight, C. Baer, and C. J. Huddleston. 1996. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:422-426.
23. Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
24. Moore, W. S., and V. R. DeFilippis. 1997. The window of taxonomic resolution for phylogenies based on mitochondrial cytochrome b. Pp. 84-119 in D. P. Mindell, ed. Avian molecular evolution and systematics. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
25. Muller, H. J. 1940. Bearing of the Drosophila work on systematics. Pp. 185-268 in J. S. Huxley, ed. The new systematics. Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K.
26. _. 1942. Isolating mechanisms, evolution, and temperature. Biol. Symp. 6:71-125.
27. Nei, M. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
28. Orr, H. A. 1993. A mathematical model of Haldane's rule. Evolution 47:1606-1611.
29. _. 1995. The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics 139:1805-1813.
30. _. 1997. Haldane's rule. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28:195-218.
31. Orr, H. A., and M. Turelli. 1996. Dominance and Haldane's rule. Genetics 143:613-616.
32. _. 2001. The evolution of postzygotic isolation: accumulating Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities. Evolution 55:1085-1094.
33. Page, R. D. M., and E. C. Holmes. 1998. Molecular evolution: a phylogenetic approach. Blackwell Science, Oxford, U.K.
34. Prager, E. M., and A. C. Wilson. 1975. Slow evolutionary loss of the potential for interspecific hybridization in birds: a manifestation of slow regulatory evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72:200-204.
35. Prager, E. M., A. H. Brush, R. A. Nolan, M. Nakanishi, and A. C. Wilson. 1974. Slow evolution of transferin and albumin in birds according to micro-complement fixation analysis. J. Mol. Evol. 3:243-262.
36. Presgraves, D. C. 2002. Patterns of postzygotic isolation in Lepidoptera. Evolution 56:1168-1183.
37. 1 postzygotic incompatibilities in birds. Evolution 56:2083-2089.
38. Riddle, O. 1919. Inheritance, fertility, and the dominance of sex and color in hybrids of wild species of pigeons: posthumous works of Charles Otis Whitman. The Carnegie Inst. of Washington, Washington, D.C.
39. Sandnes, G. C. 1957. Fertility and viability in intergeneric pheasant hybrids. Evolution 11:426-444.
40. Sasa, M. M., P. T. Chippindale, and N. A. Johnson. 1998. Patterns of postzygotic isolation in frogs. Evolution 52:1811-1820.
41. Shields, G. F., and A. C. Wilson. 1987. Calibration of mitochondrial DNA evolution in geese. J. Mol. Evol. 24:212-217.
42. Siegel, S. 1980. Estadística no paramétrica aplicada a las ciencias de la conducta. Editorial Trillas, Mexico City, Mexico.
43. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Ver. 4. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
44. Swofford, D. L., G. J. Olsen, P. J. Waddell, and D. M. Hillis. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. Pp. 407-514 in D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable, eds. Molecular Systematics. 2d ed. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
45. Tarr, C. L., and R. C. Fleischer. 1993. Mitochondrial DNA variation and evolutionary relationships in the Amakihi complex. Auk 110:825-831.
46. Tubaro, P., and D. A. Lijtmaer. 2002. Hybridization patterns and the evolution of reproductive isolation in ducks. Biol. Jour. Linn. Soc. 77:193-200.
47. Turelli, M., and D. J. Begun. 1997. Haldane's rule and X-chromosome size in Drosophila. Genetics 147:1799-1815.
48. Turelli, M., and H. A. Orr. 1995. The dominance theory of Haldane's rule. Genetics 140:389-402.
49. _. 2000. Dominance, epistasis and the genetics of postzygotic isolation. Genetics 154:1663-1679.
50. Turelli, M., N. H. Barton, and J. A. Coyne. 2001. Theory and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:330-343.
51. Wallis, G. P., and J. W. Arntzen. 1989. Mitochondrial DNA variation in the crested newt superspecies: limited cytoplasmatic gene flow among species. Evolution 43:88-104.
52. Zeng, L.-W. 1996. Resurrecting Muller's theory of Haldane's rule. Genetics 143:603-607.