Hybridization patterns and the evolution of reproductive isolation in ducks

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 193-200

  Tubaro, Pablo L ^a   Lijtmaer, Dario A ^a  

^a Mus Argen Cie Nat B Rivadavia   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Anatinae; Ducks; Haldane's rule; Hybrids; Reproductive isolation

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; HYBRID; HYBRIDIZATION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; WATERFOWL;

ANAS; ANAS SP.;

EID: 0036775902     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2002.00096.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Baldassarre GA, Bolen EG. 1994. Waterfowl ecology and management. New York: J. Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2. Bellrose FC, Scott TG, Hawkins AS, Low JB. 1961. Sex ratios and age ratios in North American ducks. Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 27: 391-474.
3. Breitwisch R. 1989. Mortality patterns, sex ratios, and parental investment in monogamous birds. Current Ornithology 6: 1-50.
4. Carboneras C. 1992. Family Anatidae. In: del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J, eds. Handbook of the birds of the world, Vol. 1. Barcelona: Lynx Editions, 536-630.
5. Casgrain P, Legendre P. 2001. The R package for multivariate and spatial analysis, Version 4.0.d5. User's manual. Département de Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montreal. Available on http://www.fas.umontreal.ca/BIOL/legendre/
6. Cheng KM, Burns JT, McKinney F. 1983. Forced copulation in captive mallards. III. Sperm competition. Auk 100: 302-310.
7. Coyne JA. 1992. Genetics and speciation. Nature 355: 511-515.
8. Coyne JA, Orr HA. 1989a. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43: 362-381.
9. Coyne JA, Orr HA. 1989b. Two rules of speciation. In: Otte D, Endler JA, eds. Speciation and its consequences. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, 180-207.
10. Coyne JA, Orr HA. 1997. 'Patterns of speciation in Drosophila' revisited. Evolution 51: 295-303.
11. Delacour J, Mayr E. 1945. The family Anatidae. Wilson Bulletin 57: 2-55.
12. Dorst J. 1972. Antes que la naturaleza muera. Barcelona: Ediciones Omega.
13. Gillham E, Gillham B. 1996. Hybrid ducks: a contribution towards an inventory. Hythe, Kent: Hythe Printers Ltd.
14. Gillham E, Gillham B. 1998. Hybrid ducks: a contribution towards an inventory. Bulletin no. 1. Suffolk: Gillham EH & Gillham BL.
15. Gillham E, Gillham B. 1999. Hybrid ducks: a contribution towards an inventory. Bulletin no. 2. Suffolk: Gillham EH & Gillham BL.
16. Gillham E, Gillham B. 2000. Hybrid ducks: a contribution towards an inventory. Bulletin no. 3. Suffolk: Gillham EH & Gillham BL.
17. Grant PR, Grant BR. 1992. Hybridization of bird species. Science 256: 193-197.
18. Gray AP. 1958. Bird hybrids. Bucks: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.
19. Griffin CR, Shallenberger RJ, Fefer SI. 1989. Hawaiiís endangered waterbirds: a resource management challenge. In: Sharitz RR, Gibbons IW, eds. Proceedings of freshwater wetlands and wildlife symposium Aiken: Savannah River Ecological Laboratory, 155-169.
20. Haddon M. 1984. A re-analysis of hybridization between Mallards and Grey Ducks in New Zealand. Auk 101: 190-191.
21. Haldane JBS. 1922. Sex ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals. Journal of Genetics 12: 101-109.
22. Johnsgard PA. 1960. Hybridization in the Anatidae and its taxonomic implications. Condor 62: 25-33.
23. Johnsgard PA, Carbonell M. 1996. Ruddy ducks and other stifftails. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
24. Johnson KP, McKinney F, Wilson R, Sorenson MD. 2000. The evolution of postcopulatory displays in dabbling ducks (Anatini): a phylogenetic perspective. Animal Behaviour 59: 953-963.
25. Johnson K, Sorenson MD. 1999. Phylogeny and biogeography of dabbling ducks (genus: Anas): a comparison of molecular and morphological evidence. Auk 116: 792-805.
26. Lever C. 1987. Naturalized birds of the world. Harlow, Essex: Longman.
27. Livezey BC. 1986. A phylogenetic analysis of recent anseriform genera using morphological characters. Auk 103: 737-754.
28. Livezey BC. 1991. A phylogenetic analysis and classification of recent dabbling ducks (Tribe Anatini) based on comparative morphology. Auk 108: 471-507.
29. Livezey BC. 1995a. Phylogeny and evolutionary ecology of modern seaducks (Anatidae: Mergini). Condor 97: 233-255.
30. Livezey BC. 1995b. Phylogeny and comparative ecology of stiff-tailed ducks (Anatidae: Oxyurini). Wilson Bulletin 107: 214-234.
31. Livezey BC. 1996. A phylogenetic analysis of modern pochards (Anatidae: Aythyini). Auk 113: 74-93.
32. Livezey BC. 1997a. A phylogenetic analysis of modern sheldgeese and shelducks (Anatidae, Tadornini). Ibis 139: 51-66.
33. Livezey BC. 1997b. A phylogenetic classification of waterfowl (Aves: Anseriformes), including selected fossil species. Annals of Carnegie Museum 66: 457-496.
34. Mazourek JC, Gray PN. 1994. The Florida duck or the Mallard. Florida Wildlife 48: 29-31.
35. McCracken KG, Harshman J, McClellan DA, Afton AD. 1999. Data set incongruence and correlated character evolution: an example of functional convergence in the hind-limbs of stifftail diving ducks. Systematic Biology 48: 683-714.
36. McIlhenny EA. 1940. Sex ratio in wild birds. Auk 57: 85-93.
37. McKitrick MC, Zink RM. 1988. Species concepts in ornithology. Condor 90: 1-14.
38. Muller HJ. 1942. Isolating mechanisms, evolution and temperature. Biological Symposia 6: 71-125.
39. Nee S, Holes EC, May RM, Harvey PH. 1995. Estimating extinction from molecular phylogenies. In: Lawton JH, May RM, eds. Extinction rates. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 164-182.
40. Orr HA. 1993. A mathematical model of Haldane's rule. Evolution 47: 1606-1611.
41. Orr HA. 1995. The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics 139: 1805-1813.
42. Orr HA. 1997. Haldane's rule. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28: 195-218.
43. Prager EM, Wilson AC. 1975. Slow evolutionary loss of the potential for interspecific hybridization in birds: a manifestation of slow regulatory evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 72: 200-204.
44. Presgraves DC, Orr HA. 1998. Haldane's rule in taxa lacking a hemizygous X. Science 282: 952-954.
45. Promislow D, Montgomerie R, Martin TE. 1994. Sexual selection and survival in North American waterfowl. Evolution 48: 2045-2050.
46. Rhymer JM, Simberloff D. 1996. Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27: 83-109.
47. Rohwer FC, Anderson MG. 1988. Female-biased philopatry, monogamy, and the timing of pair formation in migratory waterfowl. Current Ornithology 5: 187-221.
48. Scherer VS, Hilsberg T. 1982. Hybridisierung und verwandtschaftsgrade innerhalb der Anatidae - eine systematische un evolutionstheoretische betrachtuug. Journal für Ornitologie 123: 357-380.
49. Shields GF. 1982. Comparative avian cytogenetics: a review. Condor 84: 45-58.
50. Sorenson MD, Cooper A, Paxinos EE, Quinn TW, James HF, Olson SL, Fleischer RC. 1999. Relationships of the extinct moa-nalos, flightless Hawaiian waterfowl, based on ancient DNA. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 266: 2187-2193.
51. Turelli M, Orr HA. 1995. The dominance theory of Haldane's rule. Genetics 140: 389-402.
52. Wu CI, Johnson NA, Palopoli MF. 1996. Haldane's rule and its legacy: why are there so many sterile males? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 281-284.