Attention

Handbook of Cognition

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 105-129

  Bundesen, Claus ^a,b,c   Habekost, Thomas ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b Centre for Visual Cognition   (Denmark)

^c Danish Graduate School of Psychology   (Denmark)

^d MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 16244411926     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781848608177.n4     Document Type: Chapter

References (195)

1. Allport, A. (1989). Visual attention. In M. I. Posner (ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 631-682). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Allport, A. (1993). Attention and control: have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of twenty-five years. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 183-218). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Atkinson R. C., Holmgren J. E., Juola J. F. Processing time as influenced by the number of elements in a visual display Perception and Psychophysics 6 (1969) 321-326 doi:10.3758/BF03212784 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03212784
4. Bacon W. F., Egeth H. E. Overriding stimulusdriven attentional capture Perception and Psychophysics 55 (1994) 485-496 doi:10.3758/BF03205306 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03205306
5. Baylis G. C., Driver J. Visual parsing and response competition: the effect of grouping factors Perception and Psychophysics 51 (1992) 145-162 doi:10.3758/BF03212239 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03212239
6. Brehaut J. C., Enns J. T., DiLollo V. Visual masking plays two roles in the attentional blink Perception and Psychophysics 61 (1999) 1436-1448 doi:10.3758/BF03206192 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03206192
7. Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. Oxford: Pergamon Press. doi:10.1037/10037-000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10037-000
8. Broadbent, D. E. (1970). Stimulus set and response set: two kinds of selective attention. In D. I. Mostofsky (ed.), Attention: contemporary theory and analysis (pp. 51-60). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
9. Broadbent D. E., Broadbent M. H. P. From detection to identification: response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation Perception and Psychophysics 42 (1987) 105-113 doi:10.3758/BF03210498 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03210498
10. Bundesen C. Visual attention: race models for selection from multielement displays Psychological Research 49 (1987) 113-121 doi:10.1007/BF00308676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00308676
11. Bundesen C. A theory of visual attention Psychological Review 97 (1990) 523-547 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.97.4.523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.4.523
12. Bundesen C. Visual selection of features and objects: is location special? A reinterpretation of Nissen's (1985) findings Perception and Psychophysics 50 (1991) 87-89 doi:10.3758/BF03212208 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03212208
13. Bundesen C. The notion of elements in the visual field in a theory of visual attention: a reply to van der Velde and van der Heijden (1993) Perception and Psychophysics 53 (1993a) 350-352 doi:10.3758/BF03205190 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03205190
14. Bundesen C. The relationship between independent race models and Luce's choice axiom Journal of Mathematical Psychology 37 (1993b) 446-471 doi:10.1006/jmps.1993.1026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmps.1993.1026
15. Bundesen C. A computational theory of visual attention Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 353 (1998a) 1271-1281 doi:10.1098/rstb.1998.0282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1998.0282
16. Bundesen C. Visual selective attention: outlines of a choice model, a race model, and a computational theory Visual Cognition 5 (1998b) 287-309 doi:10.1080/713756774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713756774
17. Bundesen, C. (2002). A general theory of visual attention. In L. Béckman & C. von Hofsten (Eds.), Psychology at the turn of the millennium: Vol. 1, Cognitive, biological, and health perspectives (pp. 179-200). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
18. Bundesen C., Harms L. Single-letter recognition as a function of exposure duration Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 62 (1999) 275-279 doi:10.1007/s004260050057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004260050057
19. Bundesen, C., Shibuya, H., & Larsen, A. (1985). Visual selection from multielement displays: a model for partial report. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 631-649). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Cave K. R., Bichot N. P. Visuospatial attention: beyond a spotlight model Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 6 (1999) 204-223 doi:10.3758/BF03212327 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03212327
21. Cave K. R., Kosslyn S. M. Varieties of sizespecific visual selection Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 118 (1989) 148-164 doi:10.1037/0096-3445.118.2.148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.118.2.148
22. Cave K. R., Wolfe J. M. Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search Cognitive Psychology 22 (1990) 225-271 doi:10.1016/0010-0285(90)90017-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285%2890%2990017-X
23. Chelazzi L., Duncan J., Miller E. K., Desimone R. Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory guided visual search Journal of Neurophysiology 80 (1998) 2918-2940
24. Chelazzi L., Miller E. K., Duncan J., Desimone R. A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex Nature 363 (1993) 345-347 doi:10.1038/363345a0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/363345a0
25. Cherry E. C. Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25 (1953) 975-979 doi:10.1121/1.1907229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1907229
26. Chun M. M., Potter M. C. A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 (1995) 109-127 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.1.109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.21.1.109
27. Colegate R. L., Hoffman J. E., Eriksen C. W. Selective encoding from multielement visual displays Perception and Psychophysics 14 (1973) 217-224 doi:10.3758/BF03212380 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03212380
28. Czerwinski M., Lightfoot N., Shiffrin R. M. Automatization and training in visual search American Journal of Psychology 105 (1992) 271-315 doi:10.2307/1423030 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1423030
29. Dalrymple-Alford E. C., Budayr B. Examination of some aspects of the Stroop color-word test Perceptual and Motor Skills 23 (1966) 1211-1214 doi:10.2466/pms.1966.23.3f.1211 http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1966.23.3f.1211
30. Deco G., Zihl J. Top-down selective visual attention: a neurodynamical approach Visual Cognition 8 (2001) 119-141 doi:10.1080/13506280042000054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506280042000054
31. Desimone, R. (1999). Visual attention mediated by biased competition in extrastriate visual cortex. In G.W. Humphreys, J. Duncan, & A. M. Treisman (Eds.), Attention, space, and action (pp. 13-30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Desimone R., Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention Annual Review of Neuroscience 18 (1995) 193-222 doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
33. Deutsch J. A., Deutsch D. Attention: some theoretical considerations Psychological Review 70 (1963) 80-90 doi:10.1037/h0039515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0039515
34. Driver J., Tipper S. P. On the nonselectivity of ‘selective’ seeing: contrasts between interference and priming in selective attention Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 15 (1989) 304-314 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.15.2.304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.15.2.304
35. Duncan J. Selective attention and the organization of visual information Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113 (1984) 501-517 doi:10.1037/0096-3445.113.4.501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.4.501
36. Duncan, J. (1996). Cooperating brain systems in selective perception and action. In T. Inui & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance XVI: Information integration in perception and communication (pp. 549-578). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Duncan, J. (1999). Converging levels of analysis in the cognitive neuroscience of visual attention. In G.W. Humphreys, J. Duncan, & A. M. Treisman (Eds.), Attention, space, and action (pp. 112-129). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. Duncan J., Bundesen C., Olson A., Humphreys G., Chavda S., Shibuya H. Systematic analysis of deficits in visual attention Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 128 (1999) 450-478 doi:10.1037/0096-3445.128.4.450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.128.4.450
39. Duncan J., Humphreys G. W. Visual search and stimulus similarity Psychological Review 96 (1989) 433-458 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.433
40. Duncan J., Ward R., Shapiro K. Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision Nature 369 (1994) 313-315 doi:10.1038/369313a0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/369313a0
41. Enns J. T., DiLollo V., Rensink R. A. Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129 (2000) 481-507 doi:10.1037/0096-3445.129.4.481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.4.481
42. Eriksen B. A., Eriksen C. W. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task Perception and Psychophysics 16 (1974) 143-149 doi:10.3758/BF03203267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03203267
43. Eriksen C. W. Independence of successive inputs and uncorrelated error in visual form perception Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (1966) 26-35 doi:10.1037/h0023316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0023316
44. Eriksen C. W., Hoffman J. E. The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays Perception and Psychophysics 14 (1973) 155-160 doi:10.3758/BF03198630 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03198630
45. Eriksen C. W., Lappin J. S. Internal perceptual system noise and redundancy in simultaneous inputs in form identification Psychonomic Science 2 (1965) 351-352
46. Eriksen C. W., Lappin J. S. Independence in the perception of simultaneously presented forms at brief durations Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 (1967) 468-472 doi:10.1037/h0024254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0024254
47. Eriksen C. W., Spencer T. Rate of information processing in visual perception: some results and methodological considerations Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph 79 (2, Pt. 2) (1969)doi:10.1037/h0026873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0026873
48. Eriksen C. W., St James J. D. Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: a zoom lens model Perception and Psychophysics 40 (1986) 225-240 doi:10.3758/BF03211502 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03211502
49. Eriksen C. W., Webb J. M. Shifting of attentional focus within and about a visual display Perception and Psychophysics 45 (1989) 175-183 doi:10.3758/BF03208052 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03208052
50. Eriksen C. W., Yeh Y. Allocation of attention in the visual field Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 11 (1985) 583-597 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.11.5.583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.11.5.583
51. Feller, W. (1968). An introduction to probability theory and its applications (3rd ed., Vol. 1). New York: Wiley.
52. Folk C. L., Remington R. W., Johnston J. C. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18 (1992) 1030-1044 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030
53. Folk C. L., Remington R. W., Johnston J. C. Contingent attentional capture: a reply to Yantis (1993) Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19 (1993) 682-685 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.19.3.682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.19.3.682
54. Folk C. L., Remington R. W., Wright J. H. The structure of attentional control: contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 317-329 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.2.317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.20.2.317
55. Fox E. Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: a review Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2 (1995a) 145-173 doi:10.3758/BF03210958 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03210958
56. Fox E. Pre-cuing target location reduces interference but not negative priming from visual distractors Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 48A (1995b) 26-40
57. Gibson B. S., Egeth H. Inhibition of return to object-based and environment-based locations Perception and Psychophysics 55 (1994) 323-339 doi:10.3758/BF03207603 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03207603
58. Grossberg S., Mingolla E., Ross W. D. A neural theory of attentive visual search: interactions of boundary, surface, spatial, and object representations Psychological Review 101 (1994) 470-489 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.470
59. Habekost T., Bundesen C. Patient assessment based on a theory of visual attention (TVA): subtle deficits after a right frontal-subcortical lesion Neuropsychologia 41 (2003) 1171-1188 doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(03)00018-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932%2803%2900018-6
60. Harms L., Bundesen C. Color segregation and selective attention in a nonsearch task Perception and Psychophysics 33 (1983) 11-19 doi:10.3758/BF03205861 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03205861
61. Heinke D., Humphreys G. W. Attention, spatial representation, and visual neglect: simulating emergent attention and spatial memory in the selective attention for identification model (SAIM) Psychological Review 110 (2003) 29-87 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.29 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.29
62. Hillstrom A. P., Yantis S. Visual motion and attentional capture Perception and Psychophysics 55 (1994) 399-411 doi:10.3758/BF03205298 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03205298
63. Hillyard, S. A., Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. J. (1999). Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. In G.W. Humphreys, J. Duncan, & A. M. Treisman (Eds.), Attention, space, and action (pp. 31-53). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64. Hoffman J. E. Search through a sequentially presented visual display Perception and Psychophysics 23 (1978) 1-11 doi:10.3758/BF03214288 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03214288
65. Hoffman J. E. A two-stage model of visual search Perception and Psychophysics 25 (1979) 319-327 doi:10.3758/BF03198811 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03198811
66. Hoffman, J. E. (1998). Attention and eye movements. In H. Pashler (ed.), Attention (pp. 119-155). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
67. Horowitz T. S., Wolfe J. M. Visual search has no memory Nature 394 (1998) 575-577 doi:10.1038/29068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/29068
68. Humphreys, G. W. (1999). Neural representation of objects in space. In G.W. Humphreys, J. Duncan, & A. M. Treisman (Eds.), Attention, space, and action (pp. 165-182). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
69. Humphreys, G. W., Duncan, J., & Treisman, A. M. (Eds.) (1999). Attention, space, and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
70. Humphreys G. W., Moller H. J. SEarch via Recursive Rejection (SERR): a connectionist model of visual search Cognitive Psychology 25 (1993) 43-110 doi:10.1006/cogp.1993.1002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1993.1002
71. Isaak M. I., Shapiro K. L., Martin J. The attentional blink reflects retrieval competition among multiple rapid serial visual presentation items: tests of an interference model Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 1774-1792 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.25.6.1774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.25.6.1774
72. Itti L., Koch C., Niebur E. A model of saliencybased visual attention for rapid scene analysis Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20 (1999) 1254-1260 doi:10.1109/34.730558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/34.730558
73. Jolicoeur P. Orientation congruency effects on the identification of disoriented shapes Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16 (1990) 351-364 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.16.2.351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.16.2.351
74. Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
75. Jonides J., Yantis S. Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention Perception and Psychophysics 43 (1988) 346-354 doi:10.3758/BF03208805 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03208805
76. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
77. Klaver P., Smid H. G., Heinze H. J. Representations in human visual short-term memory: an event-related brain potential study Neuroscience Letters 268 (1999) 65-68 doi:10.1016/S0304-3940(99)00380-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940%2899%2900380-8
78. Koch C., Ullman S. Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry Human Neurobiology 4 (1985) 219-227
79. Kramer A. F., Jacobson A. Perceptual organization and focused attention: the role of objects and proximity in visual processing Perception and Psychophysics 50 (1991) 267-284 doi:10.3758/BF03206750 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03206750
80. Kyllingsbk S., Schneider W. X., Bundesen C. Automatic attraction of attention to former targets in visual displays of letters Perception and Psychophysics 63 (2001) 85-98 doi:10.3758/BF03200505 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03200505
81. Larsen A., Bundesen C. Size scaling in visual pattern recognition Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 4 (1978) 1-20 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.4.1.1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.4.1.1
82. Lavie N. Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 (1995) 451-468 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.3.451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.21.3.451
83. Lavie N., Fox E. The role of perceptual load in negative priming Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 (2000) 1038-1052 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.26.3.1038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.26.3.1038
84. Logan G. D. Toward an instance theory of automatization Psychological Review 95 (1988) 492-527 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492
85. Logan G. D. The CODE theory of visual attention: an integration of space-based and object-based attention Psychological Review 103 (1996) 603-649 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.4.603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.4.603
86. Logan G. D. An instance theory of attention and memory Psychological Review 109 (2002) 376-400 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.109.2.376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.2.376
87. Logan, G. D., & Bundesen, C. (1996). Spatial effects in the partial report paradigm: a challenge for theories of visual spatial attention. In D. L. Medin (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 35, pp. 243-282). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60577-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421%2808%2960577-0
88. Logan G. D., Gordon R. D. Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations Psychological Review 108 (2001) 393-434 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.393
89. Lowe D. G. Strategies, context, and the mechanisms of response inhibition Memory and Cognition 7 (1979) 382-389 doi:10.3758/BF03196943 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196943
90. Luce, R. D. (1963). Detection and recognition. In R.D. Luce, R.R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 103-189). New York: Wiley.
91. Luck S. J., Chelazzi L., Hillyard S. A., Desimone R. Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2 and V4 of macaque visual cortex Journal of Neurophysiology 77 (1997) 24-42
92. Luck S. J., Vogel E. K. The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions Nature 390 (1997) 279-281 doi:10.1038/36846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/36846
93. MacLeod C. M. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review Psychological Bulletin 109 (1991) 163-203 doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163
94. May C. P., Kane M. J., Hasher L. Determinants of negative priming Psychological Bulletin 118 (1995) 35-54 doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.35 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.35
95. McAdams C. J., Maunsell J. H. R. Effects of attention on orientation-tuning functions of single neurons in macaque cortical area V4 Journal of Neuroscience 19 (1999a) 431-441
96. McAdams C. J., Maunsell J. H. R. Effects of attention on the reliability of individual neurons in monkey visual cortex Neuron 23 (1999b) 765-773 doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(01)80034-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273%2801%2980034-9
97. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (Eds.) (1986). Parallel distributed processing (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
98. McLaughlin E. N., Shore D. I., Klein R. M. The attentional blink is immune to masking-induced data limits Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 54A (2001) 169-196 doi:10.1080/02724980042000075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02724980042000075
99. Milliken B., Joordens S., Merikle P. M., Seiffert A. E. Selective attention: a reevaluation of the implications of negative priming Psychological Review 105 (1998) 203-229 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.105.2.203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.2.203
100. Milliken, B., & Tipper, S. P. (1998). Attention and inhibition. In H. Pashler (ed.), Attention (pp. 13-75). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
101. Moore C. M. Negative priming depends on probetrial conflict: where has all the inhibition gone? Perception and Psychophysics 56 (1994) 133-147 doi:10.3758/BF03213892 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03213892
102. Moore C. M., Egeth H., Berglon L. R., Luck S. J. Are attentional dwell times inconsistent with serial visual search? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 3 (1996) 360-365 doi:10.3758/BF03210761 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03210761
103. Moran J., Desimone R. Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex Science 229 (1985) 782-784 doi:10.1126/science.4023713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.4023713
104. Moray N. Attention in dichotic listening: affective cues and the influence of instructions Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 11 (1959) 56-60 doi:10.1080/17470215908416289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470215908416289
105. Mozer, M. C. (1991). The perception of multiple objects: a connectionist approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
106. Nakayama K., Silverman G. H. Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions Nature 320 (1986) 264-265 doi:10.1038/320264a0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/320264a0
107. Neill W. T., Valdes L. A., Terry K. M., Gorfein D. S. The persistence of negative priming. II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18 (1992) 993-1000 doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.993
108. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
109. Nickerson R. S. Response times with a memorydependent decision task Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (1966) 761-769 doi:10.1037/h0023788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0023788
110. Nosofsky R. M. Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115 (1986) 39-57 doi:10.1037/0096-3445.115.1.39 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.115.1.39
111. Nosofsky R. M., Palmeri T. An exemplarbased random walk model of speeded classification Psychological Review 104 (1997) 266-300 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.266
112. Palmer J. Attention in visual search: distinguishing four causes of a set-size effect Current Directions in Psychological Science 4 (1995) 118-123 doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772534
113. Palmer J., Verghese P., Pavel M. The psychophysics of visual search Vision Research 40 (2000) 1227-1268 doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00244-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989%2899%2900244-8
114. Paquet L., Lortie C. Evidence for early selection: precuing target location reduces interference from same-category distractors Perception and Psychophysics 48 (1990) 382-388 doi:10.3758/BF03206692 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03206692
115. Parasuraman, R. (ed.). (1998). The attentive brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
116. Parasuraman, R., Warm, J. S., & See, J. E. (1998). Brain systems of vigilance. In Parasuraman, R. (ed.), The attentive brain (pp. 221-256). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
117. Pashler H. Detecting conjunctions of color and form: reassessing the serial search hypothesis Perception and Psychophysics 41 (1987) 191-201 doi:10.3758/BF03208218 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03208218
118. Pashler, H. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
119. Phaf R. H., van der Heijden A. H. C., Hudson P. T. W. SLAM: a connectionist model for attention in visual selection tasks Cognitive Psychology 22 (1990) 273-341 doi:10.1016/0010-0285(90)90006-P http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285%2890%2990006-P
120. Posner M. I. Orienting of attention Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32 (1980) 3-25 doi:10.1080/00335558008248231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335558008248231
121. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
122. Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., & Ogden, W. C. (1978). Attended and unattended processing modes: the role of set for spatial location. In H. L. Pick & I. J. Saltzman (Eds), Modes of perceiving and processing information. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
123. Posner M. I., Snyder C. R. R., Davidson B. J. Attention and the detection of signals Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 109 (1980) 160-174 doi:10.1037/0096-3445.109.2.160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.109.2.160
124. Pratt J., Abrams R. A. Inhibition of return in discrimination tasks Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 229-242 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.25.1.229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.25.1.229
125. Raymond J. E., Shapiro K. L., Arnell K. M. Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18 (1992) 849-860 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.3.849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.3.849
126. Remington R. W., Johnston J. C., Yantis S. Involuntary attention capture by abrupt onsets Perception and Psychophysics 51 (1992) 279-290 doi:10.3758/BF03212254 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03212254
127. Reynolds J. H., Chelazzi L., Desimone R. Competitive mechanisms subserve attention in macaque areas V2 and V4 Journal of Neuroscience 19 (1999) 1736-1753
128. Robertson L., Treisman A., Friedmann-Hill S., Grabowecky M. The interaction of spatial and object pathways: evidence from Balint's syndrome Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 9 (1997) 295-318 doi:10.1162/jocn.1997.9.3.295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1997.9.3.295
129. Ross, S. M. (2000). Introduction to probability and statistics for engineers and scientists (2nd ed.). London: Academic Press.
130. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (Eds.) (1986). Parallel distributed processing (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
131. Scharf, B. (1998). Auditory attention: the psychoacoustical approach. In H. Pashler (ed.), Attention (pp. 75-119). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
132. Schneider W., Shiffrin R. M. Controlled and automatic human information processing. I. Detection, search, and attention Psychological Review 84 (1977) 1-66 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.1.1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.1.1
133. Shapiro K. L., Driver J., Ward R., Sorensen R. E. Priming from the attentional blink: a failure to extract visual tokens but not visual types Psychological Science 8 (1997) 95-100 doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00689.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00689.x
134. Shapiro K. L., Raymond J. E., Arnell K. M. Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 357-371 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.2.357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.20.2.357
135. Shaw M. L. A capacity allocation model for reaction time Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 4 (1978) 586-598 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.4.4.586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.4.4.586
136. Shaw M. L., Shaw P. Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial locations Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3 (1977) 201-211 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.3.2.201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.3.2.201
137. Shibuya, H. (1991). Comparison between stochastic models for visual selection. In J.-P. Doignon & J.-C. Falmagne (Eds.), Mathematical psychology: current developments (pp. 337-356). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-9728-1_19 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9728-1_19
138. Shibuya H. Efficiency of visual selection in duplex and conjunction conditions in partial report Perception and Psychophysics 54 (1993) 716-732 doi:10.3758/BF03211797 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03211797
139. Shibuya H., Bundesen C. Visual selection from multielement displays: measuring and modeling effects of exposure duration Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14 (1988) 591-600 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.14.4.591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.14.4.591
140. Shiffrin R. M., Schneider W. Controlled and automatic human information processing. II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory Psychological Review 84 (1977) 127-190 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.127
141. Sperling G. The information available in brief visual presentations Psychological Monographs 74 (1960) (11, Whole № 498)
142. Sperling G. A model for visual memory tasks Human Factors 5 (1963) 19-31
143. Sperling G. Successive approximations to a model for short-term memory Acta Psychologica 27 (1967) 285-292 doi:10.1016/0001-6918(67)90070-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918%2867%2990070-4
144. Sperling, G. (1984). A unified theory of attention and signal detection. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 103-181). New York: Academic Press.
145. Sperling G., Budiansky J., Spivak J. G., Johnson M. C. Extremely rapid visual search: the maximum rate of scanning letters for the presence of a numeral Science 174 (1971) 307-311 doi:10.1126/science.174.4006.307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.174.4006.307
146. Sternberg S. High-speed scanning in human memory Science 153 (1966) 652-654 doi:10.1126/science.153.3736.652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.153.3736.652
147. Sternberg, S. (1967). Scanning a persisting visual image versus a memorized list. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association.
148. Sternberg S. Memory-scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments American Scientist 57 (1969a) 421-457
149. Sternberg S. The discovery of processing stages: extensions of Donders’ method Acta Psychologica 30 (1969b) 276-315 doi:10.1016/0001-6918(69)90055-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918%2869%2990055-9
150. Sternberg, S. (1998). Discovering mental processing stages: the method of additive factors. In D. Scarborough & S. Sternberg (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science: Vol. 4. Methods, models, and conceptual issues (pp. 365-454). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
151. Stroop J. R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions Journal of Experimental Psychology 18 (1935) 643-662 doi:10.1037/h0054651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0054651
152. Theeuwes J. Perceptual selectivity for color and form Perception and Psychophysics 51 (1992) 599-606 doi:10.3758/BF03211656 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03211656
153. Theeuwes J. Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 799-806 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.799
154. Theeuwes J. Temporal and spatial characteristics of preattentive and attentive processing Visual Cognition 2 (1995) 221-233 doi:10.1080/13506289508401732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506289508401732
155. Theeuwes, J. (1996). Perceptual selectivity for color and form: on the nature of the interference effect. In A.F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 297-314). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10187-010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10187-010
156. Tipper S. P. The negative priming effect: inhibitory priming by ignored objects Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 37A (1985) 571-590 doi:10.1080/14640748508400920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14640748508400920
157. Tipper S. P. Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 37A (2001) 321-343 doi:10.1080/02724980042000183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02724980042000183
158. Tipper S. P., Cranston M. Selective attention and priming: inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignored primes Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 37A (1985) 591-611 doi:10.1080/14640748508400921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14640748508400921
159. Townsend, J. T. (1969). Mock parallel and serial models and experimental detection of these. In Purdue Centennial Symposium on Information Processing (pp. 617-628). Purdue University.
160. Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). The stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
161. Treisman A. M. The effect of irrelevant material on the efficiency of selective listening American Journal of Psychology 77 (1964a) 533-546 doi:10.2307/1420765 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1420765
162. Treisman A. M. Verbal cues, language, and meaning in selective attention American Journal of Psychology 77 (1964b) 206-219 doi:10.2307/1420127 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1420127
163. Treisman A. M. Features and objects: the fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 40A (1988) 201-237 doi:10.1080/02724988843000104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02724988843000104
164. Treisman, A. M. (1999). Feature binding, attention and object perception. In G.W. Humphreys, J. Duncan, & A. M. Treisman (Eds.), Attention, space, and action (pp. 91-111). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
165. Treisman A. M., Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention Cognitive Psychology 12 (1980) 97-136 doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285%2880%2990005-5
166. Treisman A. M., Gormican S. Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries Psychological Review 95 (1988) 15-48 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.1.15 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.1.15
167. Treisman A. M., Paterson R. Emergent features, attention, and object perception Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10 (1984) 12-31 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.10.1.12 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.10.1.12
168. Treisman A. M., Sato S. Conjunction search revisited Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16 (1990) 459-478 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.16.3.459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.16.3.459
169. Treisman A. M., Schmidt H. Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects Cognitive Psychology 14 (1982) 107-141 doi:10.1016/0010-0285(82)90006-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285%2882%2990006-8
170. Treisman, A. M., Sykes, M., & Gelade, G. (1977). Selective attention and stimulus integration. In S. Dornic (ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 333-361). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
171. Treue S., Trujillo J. C. M. Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex Nature 399 (1999) 575-579 doi:10.1038/21176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/21176
172. Tsal Y., Meiran N., Lavie N. The role of attention in illusory conjunctions Perception and Psychophysics 55 (1994) 350-358 doi:10.3758/BF03207605 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03207605
173. Usher M., Niebur E. Modelling the temporal dynamics of IT neurons in visual search: a mechanism for top-down selective attention Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 8 (1996) 311-327 doi:10.1162/jocn.1996.8.4.311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1996.8.4.311
174. van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1992). Selective attention in vision. London: Routledge.
175. van der Heijden A. H. C. The role of position in object selection in vision Psychological Research 56 (1993) 44-58 doi:10.1007/BF00572132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00572132
176. van der Heijden, A. H. C. (2004). Attention in vision: perception, communication and action. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
177. van der Velde F., van der Heijden A. H. C. An element in the visual field is just a conjunction of attributes: a critique of Bundesen (1991) Perception and Psychophysics 53 (1993) 345-349 doi:10.3758/BF03205189 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03205189
178. van Oeffelen M. P., Vos P. G. Configurational effects on the enumeration of dots: counting by groups Memory and Cognition 10 (1982) 396-404 doi:10.3758/BF03202432 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03202432
179. van Oeffelen M. P., Vos P. G. An algorithm for pattern description on the level of relative proximity Pattern Recognition 16 (1983) 341-348 doi:10.1016/0031-3203(83)90040-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-3203%2883%2990040-7
180. Vogel E. K., Luck S. J., Shapiro K. L. Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 1656-1674 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.6.1656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.6.1656
181. Vogel E. K., Woodman G. F., Luck S. J. Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 (2001) 92-114 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.27.1.92 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.27.1.92
182. Ward R., Duncan J., Shapiro K. The slow time-course of visual attention Cognitive Psychology 30 (1996) 79-109 doi:10.1006/cogp.1996.0003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1996.0003
183. Weichselgartner E., Sperling G. Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention Science 238 (1987) 778-780 doi:10.1126/science.3672124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.3672124
184. Wolfe J. M. Guided Search 2.0: a revised model of visual search Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1 (1994) 202-238 doi:10.3758/BF03200774 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03200774
185. Wolfe, J. M. (1998a). Visual search. In H. Pashler (ed.), Attention (pp. 13-75). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
186. Wolfe J. M. What can 1 million trials tell us about visual search? Psychological Science 9 (1998b) 33-39 doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00006
187. Wolfe J. M., Cave K. R., Franzel S. L. Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 15 (1989) 419-433 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.15.3.419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.15.3.419
188. Woodman G. F., Luck S. J. Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search Nature 400 (1999) 867-869 doi:10.1038/23698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/23698
189. Yantis S. Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19 (1993) 676-681 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.19.3.676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.19.3.676
190. Yantis, S. (1996). Attention capture in vision. In A.F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 45-76). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10187-002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10187-002
191. Yantis, S. (1998). Control of visual attention. In H. Pashler (ed.), Attention (pp. 223-256). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
192. Yantis S., Hillstrom A. P. Stimulus-driven attentional capture: evidence from equiluminant visual objects Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 95-107 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.1.95 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.20.1.95
193. Yantis S., Jonides J. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10 (1984) 601-621 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.10.5.601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.10.5.601
194. Yantis S., Jonides J. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16 (1990) 121-134 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.16.1.121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.16.1.121
195. Zeki, S. (1993). A vision of the brain. Oxford: Blackwell.