Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search

Nature

Volumn 400, Issue 6747, 1999, Pages 867-869

  Woodman, Geoffrey F ^a   Luck, Steven J ^a  

^a E11 SSH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL SYSTEM; WAVEFORM;

ATTENTION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; HUMANS; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0033606943     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/23698     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Mozer, M. C. The Perception of Multiple Objects (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1991).
2. Treisman, A. Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 40, 201-237 (1988).
3. Wolfe, J. M. Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 1, 202-238 (1994).
4. Bundesen, C. A theory of visual attention. Psychol. Rev. 97, 523-547 (1990).
5. Duncan, J., Ward, R. & Shapiro, K. Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision. Nature 369, 313-315 (1994).
6. Luck, S. J. & Hillyard, S. A. Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Psychophysiology 31, 291-308 (1994).
7. Luck, S. J. & Hillyard, S. A. Spatial filtering during visual search: Evidence from human electrophysiology. J. Exp. Pychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 20, 1000-1014 (1994).
8. Luck, S. J., Girelli, M., McDermott, M. T. & Ford, M. A. Bridging the gap between monkey neurophysiology and human perception: An ambiguity resolution theory of visual selective attention. Cogn. Psychol. 33, 64-87 (1997).
9. Wolfe, J. M. What can 1 million trials tell us about visual search? Psychol. Sci. 9, 33-39 (1998).
10. McCarthy, G. & Wood, C. C. Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: An ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 62, 203-208 (1985).
11. Carrasco, M., Evert, D. L., Change, I. & Katz, S. M. The eccentricity effect: Target eccentricity affects performance on conjunction searches. Percept. Psychophys. 57, 1241-1261 (1995).
12. Wolfe, J. M., O'Neill, P. & Bennett, S. C. Why are there eccentricity effects in visual search? Visual and attentional hypotheses. Percept. Psychophys. 60, 140-156 (1998).
13. Townsend, J. T. Serial vs. parallel processing. Sometimes they look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and should) be distinguished. Psychol. Sci. 1, 46-54 (1990).