Are attentional dwell times inconsistent with serial visual search?

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 360-365

  Moore, Cathleen M ^a,c   Egeth, Howard ^a   Berglan, Lyndon R ^b   Luck, Steven J ^b,d  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d University of Iowa   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001487015     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03210761     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. BILSKY, A. B., & WOLKE, J. M. (1995). Part-whole information is useful in visual search for size X size but not orientation X orientation conjunctions. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 749-760.
2. BUNDESEN, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, 523-547.
3. DUNCAN, J., & HUMPHRKYS, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
4. DUNCAN, J., WARD, R., & SHAPIRO, K. L. (1994). Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision. Nature, 369, 313-315.
5. EGETH, H., & DAGENBACH, D. (1991). Parallel versus serial processing in visual search: Further evidence from subadditive effects of visual quality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 551-560.
6. EGETH, H. E., VIRZI, R. A., & GARBART, H. (1984). Searching for conjunctively defined targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 32-39.
7. ERIKSEN, C. W., & SPENCER, T. (1969). Rate of information processing in visual perception: Some results and methodological considerations. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 79 (2, Pt. 2), 1-16.
8. HOFFMAN, J. E. (1979). A two-stage model of visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 1-11.
9. KRUMHANSL, C. L. (1977). Naming and locating simultaneously and sequentially presented letters. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 293-302.
10. LUCK, S. J., & HILLYARD, S. A. (1990). Electrophysiological evidence for parallel and serial processing during visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 603-617.
11. NEISSER, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
12. PALMER, J., AMES, C. T., & LINDSEY, D. T. (1993). Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 108-130.
13. PASHLER, H., & BADGIO, P. C. (1987). Attentional issues in the identification of alphanumeric characters. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII (pp. 63-81). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. SHIFFRIN, R. M., & GARDNER, G. T. (1972). Visual processing capacity and attentional control. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 72-83.
15. STERNBERG, S. (1969). Memory-scanning: Mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. American Scientist, 57, 421-457.
16. TOWNSEND, J. T. (1972). Some results concerning the identifiability of parallel and serial processes. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 25, 168-199.
17. TOWNSEND, J. T. (1990). Serial vs. parallel processing: Sometimes they look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee, but they can (and should) be distinguished. Psychological Science, 1, 46-54.
18. TOWNSEND, J. T., & ASHBY, F. G. (1983). Stochastic modelling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. TREISMAN, A. M., & GELADE, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
20. TREISMAN, A. M., & SATO, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 459-478.
21. WARD, R., DUNCAN, J., & SHAPIRO, K. (1996). The slow time-course of visual attention. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 79-109.
22. WOLFE, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
23. WOLFE, J. M., CAVE, K. R., & FRANZEL, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 419-493.