Perception in action: Multiple roles of sensory information in action control

Cognitive Processing

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 3-14

  Hommel, Bernhard ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Action effects; Action goals; Event files; Ideomotor; Stimulus response compatibility

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION; HUMAN; MOTOR CONTROL; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SENSORY STIMULATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

EID: 15044346489     PISSN: 16124782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10339-004-0040-0     Document Type: Review

References (93)

1. Ach N (1910) Über den Willensakt und das Temperament [On will and temperament]. Quelle and Meyer, Leipzig
2. Bargh JA (1989) Conditional automaticity: varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. In: Uleman JS, Bargh JA (eds) Unintended thought. Guilford Press, New York, pp 3-51
3. Beckers T, De Houwer J, Eelen P (2002) Automatic integration of non-perceptual action effect features: the case of the associative affective Simon effect. Psychol Res 66:166-173
4. Bonnet M, MacKay WA (1989) Changes in contingent-negative variation and reaction time related to precueing of direction and force of a forearm movement. Brain Behav Evol 33:147-152
5. Bridgeman B, Lewis S, Heit G, Nagle M (1979) Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 5:692-700
6. Bruno N (2001) When does action resist visual illusions? Trends Cogn Sci 5:379-382
7. Bullock D, Grossberg S (1988) Neural dynamics of planned arm movements: emergent invariants and speed-accuracy properties during trajectory formation. Psychol Rev 95:49-90
8. Cohen JD, Dunbar K, McClelland JL (1990) On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychol Rev 97:332-361
9. Craft JL, Simon JR (1970) Processing symbolic information from a visual display: interference from an irrelevant directional cue. J Exp Psychol 83:415-420
10. Dassonville P, Lewis SM, Zhu X-H, Ugurbil K, Kim S-G, Ashe J (2001) The effect of stimulus-response compatibility on cortical motor activation. Neuroimage 13:1-14
11. De Jong R (1993) Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 19:965-980
12. Decety J, Grèzes J, Costes N, Perani D, Jeannerod M, Procyk E, Grassi F, Fazio F (1997) Brain activity during observation of actions. Influence of action content and subject's strategy. Brain 120:1763-1777
13. Di Pellegrino G, Fadiga L, Fogassi V, Gallese V, Rizzolatti G (1992) Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Exp Brain Res 91:176-180
14. Eimer M (1995) Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: evidence from psychophysiological studies. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:837-854
15. Elsner B, Hommel B (2001) Effect anticipation and action control. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27:229-240
16. Elsner B, Hommel B (2004) Contiguity and contingency in the acquisition of action effects. Psychol Res 68:138-154
17. Elsner B, Hommel B, Mentschel C, Drzezga A, Prinz W, Conrad B, Siebner H (2002) Linking actions and their perceivable consequences in the human brain. Neuroimage 17:364-372
18. Eriksen BA, Eriksen CW (1974) Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Percept Psychophys 16:143-149
19. Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Pavesi G, Rizzolatti G (1995) Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. J Neurophysiol 73:2608-2611
20. Franz VH (2001) Action does not resist visual illusions. Trends Cogn Sci 5:457-459
21. Gallese V, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Rizzolatti G (1996) Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 119:593-609
22. Georgopoulos AP (1990) Neurophysiology of reaching. In: Jeannerod M (ed) Attention and performance XIII: motor representation and control. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 227-263
23. Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
24. Gilbert SJ, Shallice T (2002) Task switching: a PDP model. Cogn Psychol 44:297-337
25. Glover S (2002) Visual illusions affect planning but not control. Trends Cogn Sci 6:288-292
26. Glover S (in press) Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behav Brain Sci
27. Glover S, Dixon P (2001) Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27:560-572
28. Glover S, Dixon P (2002) Semantics affect the planning but not control of grasping. Exp Brain Res 146:383-387
29. Goodale MA, Pélisson D, Prablanc C (1986) Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature 320:748-750
30. Goodale MA, Milner AD, Jakobson LS, Carey DP (1991) A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature 349:154-156
31. Grafton ST, Arbib MA, Fadiga L, Rizzolatti G (1996) Localization of grasp representations in humans by positrone emission tomography 2 observation compared with imagination. Exp Brain Res 112:103-111
32. Greenwald AG (1970) Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: with special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychol Rev 77:73-99
33. Hommel B (1993) Inverting the Simon effect by intention: determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychol Res 55:270-279
34. Hommel B (1996) The cognitive representation of action: automatic integration of perceived action effects. Psychol Res 59:176-186
35. Hommel B (1997) Toward an action-concept model of stimulus-response compatibility. In: Hommel B, Prinz W (eds) Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 281-320
36. Hommel B (1998a) Event files: evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cogn 5:183-216
37. Hommel B (1998b) Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:1368-1384
38. Hommel B (2000) The prepared reflex: automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation. In: Monsell S, Driver J (eds) Control of cognitive processes: attention and performance XVIII. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 247-273
39. Hommel B (2004) Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends Cogn Sci 8:494-500
40. Hommel B, Colzato LS (2004) Visual attention and the temporal dynamics of feature integration. Visual Cogn 11:483-521
41. Hommel B, Eglau B (2002) Control of stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Psychol Res 66:260-273
42. Hommel B, Müsseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W (2001a) The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behav Brain Sci 24:849-878
43. Hommel B, Müsseier J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W (2001b) Codes and their vicissitudes. Behav Brain 24:910-937
44. Hommel B, Alonso D, Fuentes LJ (2003) Acquisition and generalization of action effects. Visual Cogn 10:965-986
45. Ivry RB, Franz EA, Kingstone A, Johnston JC (1998) The psychological refractory period effect following callosotomy: uncoupling of lateralized response codes. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:463-480
46. Jackson SR (2000) Perception, awareness and action. In: Rossetti Y, Revonsuo A (eds) Interaction between dissociable conscious and nonconscious processes. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 73-98
47. Jackson PL, Decety J (2004) Motor cognition: a new paradigm to study self-other interactions. Curr Opin Neurobiol 14:259-263
48. James W (1890) The principles of psychology. Dover, New York
49. Jeannerod M (1984) The contribution of open-loop and closed-loop control modes in prehension movements. In: Kornblum S, Requin J (eds) Preparatory states and processes. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 323-337
50. Kalaska JF, Hyde ML (1985) Area 4 and area 5: differences between the load direction-dependent discharge variability of cells during active postural fixation. Exp Brain Res 59:197-202
51. Kerzel D, Hommel B, Bekkering H (2001) A Simon effect induced by induced motion: evidence for a direct linkage between cognitive and motor maps. Percept Psychophys 63:862-874
52. Kornblum S, Hasbroucq T, Osman A (1990) Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - a model and taxonomy. Psychol Rev 97:253-270
53. Kunde W (2001) Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27:387-394
54. Kutas M, Donchin E (1980) Preparation to respond as manifested by movement-related brain potentials. Brain Res 202:95-115
55. Liu X, Banich MT, Jacobson BL, Tanabe JL (2004) Common and distinct neural substrates of attentional control in an integrated Simon and spatial Stroop task as assessed by event-related fMRI. Neuroimage 22:1097-1106
56. Logan GD (1988) Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychol Rev 95:492-527
57. Logan GD, Burkell J (1986) Dependence and independence in responding to double stimulation: a comparison of stop, change, and dual-task paradigms. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 12:549-563
58. Logan GD, Gordon RD (2001) Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychol Rev 108:393-434
59. Logan GD, Schulkind MD (2000) Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. semantic memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26:1072-1090
60. Loveless NF (1962) Direction-or-motion stereotypes: a review. Ergonomics 5:357-383
61. Miall RC (2003) Connecting mirror neurons and forward models. Neuroreport 14:2135-2137
62. Milner AD, Goodale MA (1995) The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press, Oxford
63. Monsell S (2003) Task switching. Trends Cogn Sci 7:134-140
64. Pashler H (1994) Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychology B 116:220-244
65. Perenin MT, Vighetto A (1988) Optic ataxia: a specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms. I. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects. Brain 111:643-674
66. Prablanc C, Pélisson D (1990) Gaze saccade orienting and hand pointing are locked to their goal by quick internal loops. In: Jeannerod M (ed) Attention and performance XIII. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 653-676
67. Prinz W (1987) Ideo-motor action. In: Heuer H, Sanders AF (eds) Perspectives on perception and action. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 47-76
68. Prinz W (1990) A common coding approach to perception and action. In: Neumann O, Prinz W (eds) Relationships between perception and action. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 167-201
69. Proctor RW, Lu C-H (1999) Processing irrelevant information: practice and transfer effects in choice-reaction tasks. Mem Cogn 27:63-77
70. Proctor RW, Vu K-PL (2002) Mixing location-irrelevant and location-relevant trials: influence of stimulus mode on spatial compatibility effects. Mem Cogn 30:281-293
71. Proctor RW, Vu K-PL, Marble JG (2003) Spatial compatibility effects are eliminated when intermixed location-irrelevant trials produce the same spatial codes. Visual Cogn 10:15-50
72. Riehle A, Requin J (1989) Monkey primary motor and premotor cortex: single-cell activity related to prior information about direction and extent of an intended movement. J Neurophysiol 61:534-549
73. Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V (2001) Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:661-670
74. Rossetti Y, Pisella L (2002) Several 'vision for action' systems: a guide to dissociating and integrating dorsal and ventral functions. In: Prinz W, Hommel B (eds) Common mechanisms in perception and action: attention and performance XIX. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 62-119
75. Schmidt RA (1975) A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychol Rev 82:225-260
76. Schubotz RI, von Cramon DY (2001) Functional organization of the lateral premotor cortex: fMRI reveals different regions activated by anticipation of object properties, location and speed. Cogn Brain Res 11:97-112
77. Schubotz RI, von Cramon DY (2002) Predicting perceptual events activates corresponding motor schemes in lateral premotor cortex: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 15:787-796
78. Schubotz RI, von Cramon DY (2003) Functional-anatomical concepts of human premotor cortex: evidence from fMRI and PET studies. Neuroimage 20:S120-S131
79. Schubotz RI, Friederici AD, von Cramon DY (2000) Time perception and motor timing: a common cortical and subcortical basis revealed by fMRI. Neuroimage 11:1-12
80. Simon JR, Rudell AP (1967) Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. J Appl Psychol 51:300-304
81. Stock A, Stock C (2004) A short history of ideo-motor action. Psychol Res 68:176-188
82. Stoet G, Hommel B (1999) Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25:1625-1640
83. Stroop JR (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 28:643-662
84. Sudevan P, Taylor DA (1987) The cuing and priming of cognitive operations. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 13:89-103
85. Tagliabue M, Zorzi M, Umiltà C, Bassignani C (2000) The role of LTM links and STM links in the Simon effect. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26:648-670
86. Tucker M, Ellis R (1998) On the relations of seen objects and components of potential actions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:830-846
87. Turvey MT (1977) Preliminaries to a theory of action with reference to vision. In: Shaw R, Bransford J (eds) Perceiving, acting, and knowing: toward an ecological psychology. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 211-265
88. Vidal F, Bonnet M, Macar F (1991) Programming response duration in a precueing reaction time paradigm. J Mot Behav 23:226-234
89. Vu K-PL, Proctor RW, Urcuioli P (2003) Transfer effects of incompatible location-relevant mappings on a subsequent visual or auditory Simon task. Mem Cogn 31:1146-1152
90. Waszak F, Hommel B, Allport A (2003) Task-switching and long-term priming: role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cogn Psychol 46:361-413
91. Watkins KE, Strafella AP, Paus T (2003) Seeing and hearing speech excites the motor system involved in speech production. Neuropsychologia 41:989-994
92. Welford AT (1952) The "psychological refractory period" and the timing of high-speed performance - a review and a theory. Br J Psychol 43:2-19
93. Ziessler M, Nattkemper D (2002) Effect anticipation in action planning. In: Prinz W, Hommel B (eds) Common mechanisms in perception and action: attention and performance XIX. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 645-672