Toward an action-concept model of stimulus-response compatibility

Advances in Psychology

Volumn 118, Issue C, 1997, Pages 281-320

  Hommel, Bernhard ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956744698     PISSN: 01664115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0166-4115(97)80041-6     Document Type: Article

References (108)

1. Adams J.A. Response feedback and learning. Psychological Bulletin 70 (1968) 486-504
2. Alluisi E.A., and Martin H.B. An information analysis of verbal and motor responses to symbolic and conventional arabic numerals. Journal of Applied Psychology 42 (1958) 79-84
3. Anzola G.P., Bertoloni G., Buchtel H.A., and Rizzolatti G. Spatial compatibility and anatomical factors in simple and choice reaction time. Neuropsychologia 15 (1977) 295-302
4. Arend U., and Wandmacher J. On the generality of logical recoding in spatial interference tasks. Acta Psychologica 65 (1987) 193-210
5. Baddeley A.D. Working memory (1986), Oxford University Press, Oxford
6. (this volume). Barber P.J., and O'Leary M.J. The relevance of salience: Towards an activational account of irrelevant stimulus-response compatibility effects. In: Hommel B., and Prinz W. (Eds). Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (1996), North-Holland, Amsterdam 135-172
7. Bashore T.R. Vocal and manual reaction time estimates of interhemispheric transmission time. Psychological Bulletin 89 (1981) 352-368
8. Berlucchi G., Crea F., Di Stefano M., and Tassinari G. Influence of spatial stimulus-response compatibility on reaction time of ipsilateral and contralateral hand to lateralized light stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3 (1977) 505-517
9. Broadbent D.E., and Gregory M. Donders' B- and C-reactions and S-R compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (1962) 575-578
10. Castiello U., and Umiltà C. Spatial compatibility effects in different sports. International Journal of Sport Psychology 18 (1987) 276-285
11. Cattell J.M. Über die Zeit der Erkennung und Benennung von Schriftzeichen, Bildern und Farben. Philosophische Studien 2 (1885) 635-650
12. De Jong R., Liang C.C., and Lauber E. Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial S-R correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 731-750
13. Dewey J. The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review 3 (1896) 357-370
14. Duncan J. Response selection errors in spatial choice reaction tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 29 (1977) 415-423
15. Duncan J. Response selection in spatial choice reaction. Further evidence against associative models. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 30 (1978) 429-440
16. Eimer M. Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: Evidence from psychophysiological studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 (1995) 837-854
17. Eimer M., Hommel B., and Prinz W. S-R compatibility and response selection. Acta Psychologica 90 (1995) 301-313
18. Fagot C., and Pashler H. Making two responses to a single object: Implications for the central attentional bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18 (1992) 1058-1079
19. Fitts P.M., and Seeger C.M. S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology 46 (1953) 199-210
20. Frith C.D., and Done D.J. Routes to action in reaction time tasks. Psychological Research 48 (1986) 169-177
21. Gibson J.J. The ecological approach to visual perception (1979), Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA
22. Greene P.H. Why is it easy to control your arms?. Journal of Motor Behavior 14 (1982) 260-286
23. Greenwald A.G. Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychological Review 77 (1970) 73-99
24. Greenwald A.G. A double stimulation test of ideomotoric theory with implications for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (1970) 392-398
25. Grice G.R., Boroughs J.M., and Canham L. Temporal dynamics of associative interference and facilitation produced by visual context. Perception & Psychophysics 36 (1984) 499-507
26. Guiard Y. The lateral coding of rotations: A study of the Simon effect with wheel-rotation responses. Journal of Motor Behavior 15 (1983) 331-342
27. Harleß E. Der Apparat des Willens. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 38 (1861) 50-73
28. Hasbroucq T., and Guiard Y. Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward a conceptual clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 17 (1991) 246-266
29. Hasbroucq T., Guiard Y., and Ottomani L. Principles of response determination: The list-rule model of SR compatibility. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 28 (1990) 327-330
30. Hasbroucq T., Kornblum S., and Osman A. A new look at reaction time estimates of interhemispheric transmission time. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology 8 (1988) 207-221
31. Hedge A., and Marsh N.W.A. The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondences on two-choice response-time. Acta Psychologica 39 (1975) 427-439
32. Hommel B. The role of attention for the Simon effect. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 55 (1993) 208-222
33. Hommel B. Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 55 (1993) 270-279
34. Hommel B. The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 55 (1993) 280-290
35. Hommel B. Spontaneous decay of response code activation. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 56 (1994) 261-268
36. Hommel B. Effects of irrelevant spatial S-R compatibility depend on stimulus complexity. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 56 (1994) 179-184
37. Hommel B. Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward an empirical clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 (1995) 764-775
38. Hommel B. Conflict versus misguided search as explanation of S-R correspondence effects. Acta Psychologica 89 (1995) 37-51
39. Hommel B. No prevalence of right-left over above-below spatial codes. Perception & Psychophysics 58 (1996) 102-110
40. Manuscript submitted for publication. Hommel B. Decay and maintenance of spatial codes under dual-task conditions (1996)
41. Manuscript submitted for publication. Hommel B. Interactions between stimulus-stimulus congruence and stimulus-response compatibility effects (1996)
42. Manuscript submitted for publication. Hommel B. Visual noise and spatial stimulus coding (1996)
43. Hommel, B. (in press a). The cognitive representation of action: Automatic integration of perceived action effects. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung.
44. Hommel, B. (in press b). S-R compatibility effects without response uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A.
45. Hommel B., and Lippa Y. S-R compatibility effects due to context-dependent spatial stimulus coding. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2 (1995) 370-374
46. Manuscript submitted for publication. Hommel B., and Schneider W.X. Visual attention and the selection of manual responses (1996)
47. James W. The principles of psychology Vol. 2 (1890), Dover Publications, New York
48. Kornblum S. The way irrelevant dimensions are processed depends on what they overlap with: The case of Stroop- and Simon-like stimuli. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 56 (1994) 130-135
49. Kornblum S., Hasbroucq T., and Osman A. Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for S-R compatibility-a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review 97 (1990) 253-270
50. Lamberts K., Tavernier G., and d'Ydewalle G. Effects of multiple reference points in spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Acta Psychologica 79 (1992) 115-130
51. Manuscript submitted for publication. Leuthold H., and Sommer W. Spatial S-R compatibility and Simon effect: Response competition as common underlying mechanism (1996)
52. Los S.A. Procedural differences in processing intact and degrades stimuli. Memory & Cognition 22 (1994) 145-156
53. Lotze R.H. Medicinische Psychologie oder die Physiologie der Seele (1852), Weidmann'sche Buchhandlung, Leipzig
54. (this volume). Lu C.-H. Correspondence effects for irrelevant information in choice-reaction tasks: Characterizing the stimulus-response relations and the processing dynamics. In: Hommel B., and Prinz W. (Eds). Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (1996), North-Holland, Amsterdam 85-117
55. Lu C.-H., and Proctor R.W. Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 286-298
56. Manuscript submitted for publication. Lu C.-H., and Proctor R.W. Effects of ideomotor compatibility and relative timing on the processing of multidimensional stimuli (1996)
57. MacKay D.G. Self-inhibition and the disruptive effects of internal and external feedback in skilled behavior. In: Heuer H., and Fromm C. (Eds). Generation and modulation of action patterns (1986), Springer-Verlag, Berlin 174-186
58. Marzi C.A., Bisiacchi P., and Nicoletti R. Is interhemispheric transfer of visuomotor information asymmetric? Evidence from a meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia 29 (1991) 1163-1177
59. McCann R.S., and Johnston J.C. Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18 (1992) 471-484
60. (this volume). Michaels C.F., and Stins J.F. An ecological approach to stimulus-response compatibility. In: Hommel B., and Prinz W. (Eds). Theoretical issues in stimulusresponse compatibility (1996), North-Holland, Amsterdam 333-360
61. Miller J. Discrete and continuous models of human information processing: Theoretical distinctions and empirical results. Acta Psychologica 67 (1988) 191-257
62. Müsseler J. Wahrnehmung und Handlungsplanung: Effekte kompatibler und inkompatibler Reize bei der Initiierung und Ausführung von Reaktionssequenzen (1995), Shaker, Aachen
63. Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (in press). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
64. Navon D. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology 9 (1977) 353-383
65. Nicoletti R., and Umiltà C. Right-left prevalence in spatial compatibility. Perception & Psychophysics 35 (1984) 333-343
66. Nicoletti R., and Umiltà C. Splitting visual space with attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 15 (1989) 164-169
67. Nicoletti R., Umiltà C., and Ladavas E. Compatibility due to the coding of the relative position of the effectors. Acta Psychologica 57 (1984) 133-143
68. Nicoletti R., Umiltà C., Tressoldi E.P., and Marzi C.A. Why are left-right spatial codes easier to form than above-below ones?. Perception & Psychophysics 43 (1988) 287-292
69. Olson D.R. Language and thought: Aspects of a cognitive theory of semantics. Psychological Review 77 (1970) 257-273
70. Pashler H. Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: Distinct attentional mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 17 (1991) 1023-1040
71. Prinz W. Ideo-motor action. In: Heuer H., and Sanders A.F. (Eds). Perspectives on perception and action (1987), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 47-76
72. Prinz W. A common coding approach to perception and action. In: Neumann O., and Prinz W. (Eds). Relationships between perception and action (1990), Springer-Verlag, Berlin 167-201
73. Prinz W. Why don't we perceive our brain states?. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 4 (1992) 1-20
74. (this volume). Prinz W. Why Donders has led us astray. In: Hommel B., and Prinz W. (Eds). Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (1996), North-Holland, Amsterdam 247-267
75. Prinz W., Aschersleben G., Hommel B., and Vogt S. Handlungen als Ereignisse. In: Dörner D., and van der Meer E. (Eds). Das Gedächtnis: Trends, Probleme, Perspektiven (1995), Hogrefe, Göttingen 129-168
76. Prinz W., and Hommel B. Über die kognitive Repräsentation von Handlungen. In: Pawlik K. (Ed). Bericht über den 39. Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Hamburg 1994 (1995), Hogrefe, Göttingen 684-688
77. Proctor R.W., and Lu C.-H. Referential coding and attention shifting accounts of the Simon effect. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 56 (1994) 185-195
78. Riggio L., Gawryszewski L., and Umiltà C. What is crossed in crossed-hand effects?. Acta Psychologica 62 (1986) 89-100
79. Salmoni A.W., Schmidt R.A., and Walter C.B. Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin 95 (1984) 355-386
80. Sanders A.F. Stage analysis of reaction processes. In: Stelmach G.E., and Requin J. (Eds). Tutorials in motor behavior I (1980), North-Holland, Amsterdam 331-354
81. Schmidt R.A. A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review 82 (1975) 225-260
82. Schneider W.X. VAM: A neuro-cognitive model for visual attention control of segmentation, object recognition, and space-based motor action. Visual Cognition 2 (1995) 331-375
83. Simon J.R. Effect of ear stimulated on reaction time and movement time. Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (1968) 344-346
84. Simon J.R. Effect of an auditory stimulus on the processing of a visual stimulus under single- and dual-tasks conditions. Acta Psychologica 51 (1982) 61-73
85. Simon J.R., and Berbaum K. Effect of conflicting cues on information processing: The 'Stroop effect' vs. the 'Simon effect'. Acta Psychologica 73 (1990) 159-170
86. Simon J.R., Paullin C., Overmyer S.P., and Berbaum K. Reaction time to word meaning and ink color of laterally-presented Stroop stimuli: Effects of handedness and sex. International Journal of Neuroscience 28 (1985) 21-33
87. Simon J.R., and Rudell A.P. Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology 51 (1967) 300-304
88. Simon J.R., Sly P.E., and Vilapakkam S. Effects of compatibility of S-R mapping on reactions toward the stimulus source. Acta Psychologica 47 (1981) 63-81
89. Simon J.R., and Sudalaimuthu P. Effects of S-R mapping and response modality on performance in a Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 5 (1979) 176-187
90. Sommer W., Leuthold H., and Hermanutz M. Covert effects of alcohol revealed by event-related potentials. Perception & Psychophysics 54 (1993) 127-135
91. Stanovich K.E., and Pachella R.G. Encoding, stimulus-response compatibility, and stages of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3 (1977) 411-421
92. Sternberg S. The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica 30 (1969) 276-315
93. Stoffels E.-J. On stage robustness and response selection routes: Further evidence. Acta Psychologica 91 (1996) 67-81
94. Stoffels E.-J., and Van der Molen M.W. Effects of visual and auditory noise on visual choice reaction time in a continuous-flow paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics 44 (1988) 7-14
95. Stoffels E.-J., Van der Molen M.W., and Keuss P.G.J. An additive factor analysis of the effect(s) of location cues associated with auditory stimuli on stages of information processing. Acta Psychologica 70 (1989) 161-197
96. Stoffer T.H. Attentional focussing and spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Psychological Research 53 (1991) 127-135
97. Stoffer T.H., and Yakin A.R. The functional role of attention for spatial coding on the Simon effect. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 53 (1994) 127-135
98. Sugg M.J., and McDonald J.E. Time course of inhibition in color-response and word-response versions of the Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 647-675
99. Teichner W.H., and Krebs M.J. Laws of the simple visual reaction time. Psychological Review 79 (1972) 344-358
100. Theios J. Reaction time measurements in the study of memory processes: Theory and data. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 7 (1973) 43-85
101. Toth J.P., Levine B., Stuss D.T., Oh A., Winocur G., and Meiran N. Dissociation of processes underlying spatial S-R compatibility: Evidence for the independent influence of what and where. Consciousness and Cognition 4 (1995) 483-501
102. Treisman A.M. Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 40A (1988) 201-237
103. Van der Heijden A.H.C. Selective attention in vision (1992), Routledge, London
104. Van Duren L.L., and Sanders A.F. On the robustness of the additive factors stage structure in blocked and mixed choice reaction designs. Acta Psychologica 69 (1988) 83-94
105. Wallace R.J. S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology 88 (1971) 354-360
106. Weeks D.J., and Proctor R.W. Salient-features coding in the translation between orthogonal stimulus and response dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 119 (1990) 355-366
107. Wolff P. Saccadic eye movements and visual stability: Preliminary considerations towards a cognitive approach. In: Prinz W., and Sanders A.F. (Eds). Cognition and motor processes (1984), Springer, Berlin 121-137
108. Unpublished master's thesis, Tübingen, Germany. Zachay A. Diskrete und kontinuierliche Informationsverarbeitungsmodelle zur Erklärung von Reiz-Reaktions-Inkompatibilitäten: Evidenz für einen Antwortkonflikt beim Simon-Effekt (1991)