A Simon effect induced by induced motion and location: Evidence for a direct linkage of cognitive and motor maps

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 63, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 862-874

  Kerzel, Dirk ^a   Hommel, Bernhard ^a,b   Bekkering, Harold ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; ORIENTATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0035409510     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194443     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. AGLIOTI, S., DESOUZA, J. F. X., & GOODALE, M. A. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5, 579-685.
2. BRIDGEMAN, B., KIRCH, M., & SPERLING, A. (1981). Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 336-342.
3. BRIDGEMAN, B. LEWIS, S., HEIT, G., & NAGLE, M. (1979). Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 5, 692-700.
4. BRIDGEMAN, B., PEERY, S., & ANAND, S. (1997). Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 456-469.
5. BROADBENT, D. E., & GREGORY, M. (1965). On the interaction of S-R compatibility with other variables affecting reaction time. British Journal of Psychology, 56, 61-67.
6. DE JONG, R., LIANG, C. C., & LAUBER, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 731-750.
7. DUNCKER, K. (1929). Über induzierte Bewegung (Ein Beitrag zur Theorie optisch wahrgenommener Bewegung) [On induced motion (A contribution to the theory of optically perceived motion)]. Psychologische Forschung, 12, 180-259.
8. EGETH, H. E., & YANTIS, S. (1997). Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 269-297.
9. EHRENSTEIN, W. H. (1994). The Simon effect and visual motion. Psychological Research, 56, 163-169.
10. EIMER, M. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: Evidence from psychophysiological studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 837-854.
11. FOLK, C. L., REMINGTON, R. W., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
12. FOLK, C. L., REMINGTON, R. W., & WRIGHT, J. H. (1994). The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 317-329.
13. FRANZ, V. H., GEGENFURTNER, K. R., BÜLTHOFF, H. H., & FAHLE, M. (2000). Grasping visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychological Science, 11, 20-25.
14. GIBSON, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
15. GOODALE, M. A., & MILNER, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15, 20-25.
16. GOODALE, M. A., MILNER, A. D., JAKOBSON, L. S., & CAREY, D. P. (1991). A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature, 349, 154-156.
17. GREENWALD, A. G. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77, 73-99.
18. HILLSTROM, A. P., & YANTIS, S. (1994). Visual motion and attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 399-411.
19. HOMMEL, B. (1993). The role of attention for the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 55, 208-222.
20. HOMMEL, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response-code activation. Psychological Research, 56, 261-268.
21. HOMMEL, B., & LIPPA, Y. (1995). S-R compatibility effects due to context-dependent spatial stimulus coding. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 370-374.
22. HOMMEL, B., & PRINZ, W. (EDS.) (1997). Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
23. JONIDES, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In J. B. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. KORNBLUM, S., HASBROUCQ, T., & OSMAN, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
25. LAMBERTS, K., TAVERNIER, G., & D'YDEWALLE, G. (1992). Effects of multiple reference points in spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Acta Psychologica, 79, 115-130.
26. LU, C.-H., & PROCTOR, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174-207.
27. MACK, A, HEUER, F., FENDRICH, R., VILARDI, K., & CHAMBERS, D. (1985). Induced motion and oculomotor capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 329-345.
28. MELARA, R. D., & MARKS, L. E. (1990). Perceptual primacy of dimensions: Support for a model of dimensional interaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 398-414.
29. MICHAELS, C. F. (1988). S-R compatibility between response position and destination of apparent motion: Evidence of the detection of affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 231-240.
30. MILLER, J. (1989). The control of attention by abrupt visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 567-571.
31. NICOLETTI, R., & UMILTÀ, C. (1989). Splitting visual space with attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 164-169.
32. POLA, J., & WYATT, H. J. (1980). Target position and velocity: The stimuli for smooth pursuit eye movements. Vision Research, 20, 523-534.
33. PORT, N. L., PELLIZZER, G., & GEORGOPOULOS, A. P. (1996). Intercepting real and path-guided apparent motion targets. Experimental Brain Research, 110, 298-307.
34. PRINZ, W. (1990). A common coding approach to perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action (pp. 167-201). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
35. PROCTOR, R. W., & REEVE, T. G. (EDS.) (1990). Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
36. PROCTOR, R. W., VAN ZANDT, T., LU, C., & WEEKS, D. J. (1993). Stimulus-response compatibility for moving stimuli: Perception of affordances or directional coding? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 81-91.
37. PROCTOR, R. W., VAN ZANDT, T., & WATSON, H. D. (1990). Effects of background symmetry on same-different pattern matching: A compromise-criteria account. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 543-550.
38. RIZZOLATTI, G., RIGGIO, L., DASCOLA, I., & UMILTÀ, C. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia, 25, 31-40.
39. RIZZOLATTI, G., RIGGIO, L., & SHELIGA, B. M. (1994). Space and selective attention. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (232-265). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. ROELOFS, C. O. (1935). Die optische Localisation [Optical localization]. Archiv für Augenheilkunde, 109, 395-415.
41. ROSWARSKI, T. E., & PROCTOR, R. W. (1996). Multiple spatial codes and temporal overlap in choice-reaction tasks. Psychological Research, 59, 196-211.
42. RUBICHI, S., NICOLETTI, R., IANI, C., & UMILTÀ, C. (1997). The Simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attention shift. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 1353-1364.
43. SIMON, J. R., HINRICHS, J. V., & CRAFT, J. L. (1970). Auditory S-R compatibility: Reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 97-102.
44. SMEETS, J. B. J., & BRENNER, E. (1995). Perception and action are based on the same visual information: Distinction between position and velocity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 19-31.
45. SOMMER, W., LEUTHOLD, H., & HERMANUTZ, M. (1993). Covert effects of alcohol revealed by event-related potentials. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 127-135.
46. STINS, J. F., & MICHAELS, C. F. (1997). Stimulus-response compatibility is information-Action compatibility. Ecological Psychology, 9, 25-45.
47. STOFFER, T. H. (1991). Attentional focussing and spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Psychological Research, 53, 127-135.
48. THEEUWES, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 83-90.
49. UMILTÀ, C., & LIOTTI, M. (1987). Egocentric and relative spatial codes in S-R compatibility. Psychological Research, 49, 91-90.
50. UMILTÀ, C., & NICOLETTI, R. (1992). Spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 117-143). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
51. VAN DONKELAAR, P. (1999). Pointing movements are affected by size-contrast illusions. Experimental Brain Research, 125, 517-520.
52. WALLACE, R. J. (1971). S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 354-360.
53. WATSON, H. D. (1981). The effects of objective and perceived size properties on visual form matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 547-567.
54. WEEKS, D. J., CHUA, R., & HAMBLIN, K. (1996). Attention shifts and the Simon effect: A failure to replicate Stoffer (1991). Psychological Research, 58, 246-253.
55. WESTHEIMER, G. (1954). Eye movement responses to a horizontally moving visual stimulus. Source Archives of Ophthalmology, 52, 932-941.
56. YANTIS, S., & JONIDES, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 121-134.
57. ZACHAY, A. (1991). Diskrete und kontinuierliche Informationsverarbeitungsmodelle zur Erklärung von Reiz-Reaktions-Inkompatibilitäten: Evidenz für einen Antwortkonflikt beim Simon-Effekt [Discrete and continuous models of information processing accounting for stimulus-response incompatibilities: Evidence for a response conflict in the Simon-effect]. Unpublished master's thesis, Tübingen, Germany.