Consumer perceptions of novel fruit and familiar fruit: A repertory grid application

Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Volumn 85, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 480-488

  Jaeger, Sara R ^a,b   Rossiter, Karen L ^a   Lau, Karen ^a  

^a THE NEW ZEALAND INSTITUTE FOR PLANT AND FOOD RESEARCH LIMITED   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Curved box plot; Generalised Procrustes Analysis; Perceived novelty; Use situations

Indexed keywords

PROCRUSTES;

EID: 13444261390     PISSN: 00225142     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.2008     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Earp RW, Export and marketing of New Zealand kiwifruit, in Kiwifruit Science and Management, ed by Warrington IJ and Weston GC. New Zealand Society for Horticultural Science, Wellington, New Zealand, pp 485-510 (1990).
2. Patterson K, Burdon J and Lallu N, 'Hort16A' Kiwifruit: Progress and issues with commercialisation. Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Kiwifruit. Acta Hortic 610:267-273 (2003).
3. Anon A, Global Overview of the Fresh Fruit Produce Industry. Eurofruit 345:23 (2002).
4. Janick J and Simon JE, New Crops. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1993).
5. Harker FR, Organic food claims cannot be substantiated through testing of samples intercepted in the marketplace: a horticulturalist's opinion. Food Qual Prefer 15:91-95 (2004).
6. Janick J, Perspectives on New Crops and New Uses. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA (1999).
7. Jaeger SR, Andani Z, Wakeling IN and MacFie HJH, Consumer preferences for fresh and aged apples: a cross-cultural comparison. Food Qual Prefer 9:355-366 (1998).
8. Jaeger SR, Rossiter KL, Wismer WV and Harker FR, Consumer-driven product development in the kiwifruit industry. Food Qual Prefer 14:187-198 (2003).
9. Jaeger SR, Lund CM, Lau K and Harker FR, In search of the 'ideal' pear (pyrus spp): results of a multidisciplinary exploration. J Food Sci 68:1108-1117 (2003).
10. Pliner P and Hobden K, Development of a scale to measure the trade of food neophobia in humans. Appetite 19:105-120 (1992).
11. Pliner P, Pelchat M and Grabski M, Reduction of neophobia in humans by exposure to novel foods. Appetite 20:111-123 (1993).
12. Tuorila H, Meiselman H, Bell R, Cardello AV and Johnson W, Role of sensory and cognitive information in the enhancement of certainty and liking for novel and familiar foods. Appetite 23:231-246 (1994).
13. Hobden K and Pliner P, Effects of a model on food neophobia in humans. Appetite 25:101-114 (1995).
14. Raudenbush B, van der Klauaw N and Frank RA, The construction of psychological and sensory factors for food preference patterns as measured by the food attitudes survey (FAS). Appetite 25:1-15 (1995).
15. Pliner P and Loewen ER, Temperament and food neophobia in children and their mothers. Appetite 28:239-254 (1997).
16. Tuorila H, Meiselman H, Bell R, Cardello AV and Lesher LL, Effect of expectations and the definition of product category of the acceptance of unfamiliar foods. Food Qual Prefer 9:421-430 (1998).
17. Arvola A, Lahteenmaki L and Tuorila H, Predicting the intent to purchase unfamiliar and familiar cheeses: the effect of attitudes, expected liking and food neophobia. Appetite 32:113-126 (1999).
18. Pliner P, Lahteenmaki L and Tuorila H, Correlates of human food neophobia. Appetite 30:93 (1998).
19. Raudenbush B, Schroth F, Reilley S and Frank RA, Food neophobia, odor evaluation and exploratory sniffing behaviour. Appetite 31:171-183 (1998).
20. Raudenbush B and Frank RA, Assessing food neophobia: the role of stimulus familiarity. Appetite 32:261-271 (1999).
21. Harker FR, Gunson FA and Jaeger SR, The case for fruit quality: an interpretive review of consumer attitudes, and preferences for apples. Postharvest Biol Technol 28:333-347 (2003).
22. Kelly GA, The Psychology of Personal Constructs. Norton, New York (1955).
23. Stewart V, Stewart A and Fonda N, Business Applications of Repertory Grid. McGraw-Hill, London (1981).
24. Fransella F and Bannister D, A Manual for Repertory Grid Technique. Academic Press, London (1977).
25. Marsden D and Littler D, Repertory grid technique. An interpretative framework. Eur J Marketing 34:816-834 (2000).
26. Calisir F and Lehto MR, Drivers' risk assessments and their impact on seat belt use. Computers Ind Eng 31:495-498 (1996).
27. Jaeger SR and Meiselman HL, Perceptions of evening meal convenience: the case of at-home evening meals. Appetite 42:317-325 (2004).
28. Caputi P and Reddy P, A comparison of triadic and dynamic methods of construct elicitation. J Constructivist Psychol 12:253-264 (1999).
29. Gallifa J and Botella L, The structural quadrants method: a new approach to the assessment of construct system complexity via repertory grid. J Constructivist Psychol 13:1-26 (2000).
30. Buckley P, A novel method for the measurement of noticeability of packaging information, in Creative Applications: Sensory Techniques used in Conducting Packaging Research with Consumers, ed by Gelinas A. ASTM Special Technical Publication 1316, Scranton, PA, pp 25-30 (1996).
31. Corney MJ, Issanchou S, Shepherd R, Griffin K, Nanayakkara C and Daillant B, Effects of food label health and nutrition claims on consumer perceptions, in Creative Applications: Sensory Techniques used in Conducting Packaging Research with Consumers, ed by Gelinas A. ASTM Special Technical Publication 1316, Scranton, PA, pp 3-15 (1996).
32. Gower JC, Generalized Procrustes Analysis. Psychometrika 40:33-51 (1975).
33. Raats MM and Shepherd R, An evaluation of the use and perceived appropriateness of milk using the repertory grid method and the 'item by use' appropriateness method. Food Qua Prefer 3:89-100 (1991/2).
34. Jack FR, Piacentini MG and Schroder MJA, Perception and role of fruit in the workday diets of Scottish lorry drivers. Appetite 30:139-149 (1998).
35. Andani Z, Jaeger SR, Wakeling IN and MacFie HJH, Mealiness in apples: towards a multilingual consumer vocabulary. J Food Sci 66:872-879 (2001).
36. Dijksterhuis G, Preference mapping for product optimisation, in Multivariate Analysis of Data in Sensory Science, ed by Næs T and Risvik E, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 185-219 (1996).
37. Dijksterhuis GB and Gower JC, The interpretation of generalized procrustes analysis and allied methods. Food Qual Prefer 3:66-67 (1991/2).
38. McEwan JA and Hallet EM, A Guide to the Use and Interpretation of Generalized Procrustes Analysis, Technical Manual No 30, Campden & Chorleywood Food Research Association, Gloucestershire, UK (1990).
39. McEwan JA, Earthy PJ and Ducher C, Preference Mapping: A Review, Review No 6, Campden & Chorleywood Food Research Association, Gloucestershire, UK (1998).
40. Tukey JW, Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1977).
41. HortResearch, HortResearch Facts and Figures 2000, Downloaded from http://www.hortresearch.co.nz/files/facts_figs _2000.pdf on 21 January (2004).
42. Koivisto Hursti U-K and Sjödén P-O, Food related and general neophobia and their relationship with self-reported food choice: familial resemblance in Swedish families with children of ages 7-17 years. Appetite 29:89-103 (1997).
43. Steptoe A, Pollard TM and Wardle J, Development of a measure of the motives underlying the selection of food: the food choice questionnaire. Appetite 25:267-284 (1995).
44. Steptoe A and Wardle J, Motivational factors as mediators of socioeconomic variations in dietary intake patterns. Psychol Health 14:391-402 (1999).
45. Crossley ML and Khan SN, Motives on the line food choice: dentists, porters and dietary health promotion. Br Dent J 191:198-202 (2001).
46. Prescott J, Young O, O'Neill L, Yau NJN and Stevens R, Motives for food choice: a comparison of consumers from Japan, Taiwan, Malaysia and New Zealand. Food Qual Prefer 13:489-495 (2002).
47. Cowie A, Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1989).