Drivers' risk assessments and their impact on seat belt use

Computers and Industrial Engineering

Volumn 31, Issue 1-2, 1996, Pages 495-498

  Calisir, F ^a   Lehto, M R ^a  

^a SCHOOL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING   (United States)

Author keywords

Accident scenarios; Collision; Perceived risk; Repertory grid technique; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE SEAT BELTS; PERSONNEL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY FACTOR;

ACCIDENT SCENARIOS; DRIVERS RISK ASSESSMENT; PERCEIVED RISK; REPERTORY GRID TECHNIQUE;

HUMAN ENGINEERING;

EID: 0030270226     PISSN: 03608352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0360-8352(96)82543-5     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Fhaner, G. and M. Hane (1974). Seat belts: relation between beliefs, attitude, and use. J. of Applied Psychology, 52, 472-482.
2. Fischoff, B., A. Bostrom and M. Quadrel (1993). Risk perception and communication. Annual Rev. Public Health, 14, 183-203.
3. Kraus, N.N. and P. Slovic (1988). Taxonomic analysis of perceived risk: modeling individual and group perceptions within homogeneous hazard domains. Risk Analysis, 8(3), 435-455.
4. Perusse, M. (1980). Dimensions of perception and recognition of danger. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Aston University, Birmingham University, U.K.
5. Wallach, M. and N. Kogan (1961). Aspects of judgment and decision making: Interrelationships and change with age. Behavioral Science, 6, 23-26.
6. Weinstein, N. (1987). Taking care: Understanding and encouraging self-protective behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press