Depletion of Drad21/Scc1 in Drosophila cells leads to instability of the cohesin complex and disruption of mitotic progression

Current Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 208-218

  Vass, Sharron ^a   Cotterill, Sue ^b   Valdeolmillos, Ana M ^c   Barbero, José L ^c   Lin, Enmoore ^d   Warren, William D ^d,e   Heck, Margarete M S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^d PETER MACCALLUM CANCER CENTRE   (Australia)

^e JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; COHESINS; CYCB PROTEIN, DROSOPHILA; CYCLIN B; DOUBLE STRANDED RNA; DROSOPHILA PROTEIN; FUNGAL PROTEIN; NONHISTONE PROTEIN; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; PROTEIN SUBUNIT; RAD21 PROTEIN, DROSOPHILA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; CELL SIZE; CHROMOSOME; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; MACROMOLECULE; METABOLISM; MITOSIS; MITOSIS SPINDLE; PHYSIOLOGY; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; RNA INTERFERENCE;

ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CELL SIZE; CELLS, CULTURED; CHROMOSOMAL PROTEINS, NON-HISTONE; CHROMOSOMES; CYCLIN B; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DROSOPHILA PROTEINS; FUNGAL PROTEINS; MACROMOLECULAR SUBSTANCES; MITOSIS; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PROTEIN SUBUNITS; RNA INTERFERENCE; RNA, DOUBLE-STRANDED;

ANIMALIA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; MELANOGASTER;

EID: 12244296163     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00047-2     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Cobbe, N., and Heck, M.M. (2000). Review: SMCs in the world of chromosome biology-from prokaryotes to higher eukaryotes. J. Struct. Biol. 129, 123-143.
2. Cohen-Fix, O. (2001). The making and breaking of sister chromatid cohesion. Cell 106, 137-140.
3. Hirano, T. (2000). Chromosome cohesion, condensation and separation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 69, 115-144.
4. Lee, J.Y., and Orr-Weaver, T.L. (2001). The Molecular basis of sister chromatid cohesion. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 17, 753-777.
5. Nasmyth, K. (2001). Disseminating the genome: joining, resolving, and separating sister chromatids during mitosis and meiosis. Annu. Rev. Genet. 35, 673-745.
6. Losada, A., Hirano, M., and Hirano, T. (1998). Identification of Xenopus SMC protein complexes required for sister chromatid cohesion. Genes Dev. 12, 1986-1997.
7. Losada, A., Yokochi, T., Kobayashi, R., and Hirano, T. (2000). Identification and characterization of SA/Scc3p subunits in the Xenopus and human cohesin complexes. J. Cell Biol. 150, 405-416.
8. Sumara, I., Vorlaufer, E., Gieffers, C., Peters, B.H., and Peters, J.M. (2000). Characterization of vertebrate cohesin complexes and their regulation in prophase. J. Cell Biol. 151, 749-762.
9. Hirano, T., Kobayashi, R., and Hirano, M. (1997). Condensins, chromosome condensation protein complexes containing XCAP- C, XCAP-E and a Xenopus homolog of the Drosophila Barren protein. Cell 89, 511-521.
10. Sutani, T., Yuasa, T., Tomonaga, T., Dohmae, N., Takio, K., and Yanagida, M. (1999). Fission yeast condensin complex: essential roles of non-SMC subunits for condensation and Cdc2 phosphorylation of Cut3/SMC4. Genes Dev. 13, 2271-2283.
11. Blat, Y., and Kleckner, N. (1999). Cohesins bind to preferential sites along yeast chromosome III, with differential regulation along arms versus the centric region. Cell 98, 249-259.
12. Tanaka, T., Cosma, M.P., Wirth, K., and Nasmyth, K. (1999). Identification of cohesin association sites at centromeres and along chromosome arms. Cell 98, 847-858.
13. Waizenegger, I.C., Hauf, S., Meinke, A., and Peters, J.M. (2000). Two distinct pathways remove mammalian cohesin from chromosome arms in prophase and from centromeres in anaphase. Cell 103, 399-410.
14. Warren, W.D., Steffensen, S., Lin, E., Coelho, P., Loupart, M., Cobbe, N., Lee, J.Y., McKay, M.J., Orr-Weaver, T., Heck, M.M., et al. (2000). The Drosophila RAD21 cohesin persists at the centromere region in mitosis. Curr. Biol. 10, 1463-1466.
15. Steffensen, S., Coelho, P.A., Cobbe, N., Vass, S., Costa, M., Hassan, B., Prokopenko, S.N., Bellen, H., Heck, M.M., and Sunkel, C.E. (2001). A role for Drosophila SMC4 in the resolution of sister chromatids in mitosis. Curr. Biol. 11, 295-307.
16. Warren, W.D., Lin, E., Nheu, T.V., Hime, G.R., and McKay, M.J. (2000). Drad21, a Drosophila tad21 homologue expressed in S-phase cells. Gene 250, 77-84.
17. Caplen, N.J., Fleenor, J., Fire, A., and Morgan, R.A. (2000). dsRNA-mediated gene silencing in cultured Drosophila cells: a tissue culture model for the analysis of RNA interference. Gene 252, 95-105.
18. Clemens, J.C., Worby, C.A., Simonson-Leff, N., Muda, M., Maehama, T., Hemmings, B.A., and Dixon, J.E. (2000). Use of double-stranded RNA interference in Drosophila cell lines to dissect signal transduction pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 6499-6503.
19. Cooke, C.A., Heck, M.M., and Earnshaw, W.C. (1987). The inner centromere protein (INCENP) antigens: movement from inner centromere to midbody during mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 105, 2053-2067.
20. Adams, R.R., Maiato, H., Earnshaw, W.C., and Carmena, M. (2001). Essential roles of Drosophila inner centromeric protein (INCENP) and Aurora B in histone H3 phosphorylation, metaphase chromosome alignment, kinetochore disjunction, and chromosome segregation. J. Cell Biol. 153, 865-879.
21. Hong, C.C., and Hashimoto, C. (1996). The maternal nudel protein of Drosophila has two distinct roles important for embryogenesis. Genetics 143, 1653-1661.
22. Valdeolmillos, A., Villares, R., Buesa, J.M., Gonzalez-Crespo, S., Martinez, C., and Barbero, J.L. (1998). Molecular cloning and expression of stromalin protein from Drosophila melanogaster: homologous to mammalian stromalin family of nuclear proteins. DNA Cell Biol. 17, 699-706.
23. Hirano, M., and Hirano, T. (2002). Hinge-mediated dimerization of SMC protein is essential for its dynamic interaction with DNA. EMBO J. 21, 5733-5744.
24. Haering, C.H., Lowe, J., Hochwagen, A., and Nasmyth, K. (2002). Molecular architecture of SMC proteins and the yeast cohesin complex. Mol. Cell 9, 773-788.
25. Huang, J., and Raft, J.W. (1999). The disappearance of cyclin B at the end of mitosis is regulated spatially in Drosophila cells. EMBO J. 18, 2184-2195.
26. Whitfield, W.G., Gonzalez, C., Maldonado-Codina, G., and Clover, D.M. (1990). The A- and B-type cyclins of Drosophila are accumulated and destroyed in temporally distinct events that define separable phases of the G2-M transition. EMBO J. 9, 2563-2572.
27. Ohnuki, Y. (1968). Structure of chromosomes. I. Morphological studies of the spiral structure of human somatic chromosomes. Chromosoma 25, 402-428.
28. Blower, M.D., and Karpen, G.H. (2001). The role of Drosophila CID in kinetochore formation, cell-cycle progression and heterochromatin interactions. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 730-739.
29. Clarkson, M., and Saint, R. (1999). A His2AvDGFP fusion gene complements a lethal His2AvD mutant allele and provides an in vivo marker for Drosophila chromosome behavior. DNA Cell Biol. 18, 457-462.
30. Fogarty, P., Kalpin, R.F., and Sullivan, W. (1994). The Drosophila maternal-effect mutation grapes causes a metaphase arrest at nuclear cycle 13. Development 120, 2131-2142.
31. Sibon, O.C., Stevenson, V.A., and Theurkauf, W.E. (1997). DNA-replication checkpoint control at the Drosophila midblastula transition. Nature 388, 93-97.
32. Sonoda, E., Matsusaka, T., Morrison, C., Vagnarelli, P., Hoshi, O., Ushiki, T., Nojima, K., Fukagawa, T., Waizenegger, I.C., Peters, J.M., et al. (2001). Scc1/Rad21/Mcd1 is required for sister chromatid cohesion and kinetochore function in vertebrate cells. Dev. Cell 1, 759-770.
33. Hoque, M.T., and Ishikawa, F. (2002). Cohesin defects lead to premature sister chromatid separation, kinetochore dysfunction, and spindle-assembly checkpoint activation. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 42306-42314.
34. Nicklas, R.B. (1997). How cells get the right chromosomes. Science 275, 632-637.
35. Waters, J.C., Chen, R.H., Murray, A.W., and Salmon, E.D. (1998). Localization of Mad2 to kinetochores depends on microtubule attachment, not tension. J. Cell Biol. 141, 1181-1191.
36. Gregson, H.C., Schmiesing, J.A., Kim, J.-S., Kobayashi, T., Zhou, S., and Yokomori, K. (2001). A potential role for human cohesin in mitotic spindle aster assembly. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 47575-47582.
37. Murata-Hori, M., and Wang, Y. (2002). The kinase activity of aurora B is required for kinetochore-microtubule interactions during mitosis. Curr. Biol. 12, 894-899.
38. Adams, R.R., Wheatleya, S.P., Gouldsworthy, A.M., Kandels-Lewis, S.E., Carmena, M., Smythe, C., Gerloff, D.L., and Earnshaw, W.C. (2000). INCENP binds the Aurora-related kinase AIRK2 and is required to target it to chromosomes, the central spindle and cleavage furrow. Curr. Biol. 10, 1075-1078.
39. Kaitna, S., Mendoza, M., Jantsch-Plunger, V., and Glotzer, M. (2000). Incenp and an aurora-like kinase form a complex essential for chromosome segregation and efficient completion of cytokinesis. Curr. Biol. 10, 1172-1181.
40. Martineau-Thuillier, S., Andreassen, P.R., and Margolis, R.L. (1998). Colocalization of TD-60 and INCENP throughout G2 and mitosis: evidence for their possible interaction in signalling cytokinesis. Chromosoma 107, 461-470.
41. Uren, A.G., Wong, L., Pakusch, M., Fowler, K.J., Burrows, F.J., Vaux, D.L., and Choo, K.H. (2000). Survivin and the inner centromere protein INCENP show similar cell-cycle localization and gene knockout phenotype. Curr. Biol. 10, 1319-1328.
42. Wheatley, S.P., Carvalho, A., Vagnarelli, P., and Earnshaw, W.C. (2001). INCENP is required for proper targeting of Survivin to the centromeres and the anaphase spindle during mitosis. Curr. Biol. 11, 886-890.
43. Birkenbihl, R., and Subramani, S. (1992). Cloning and characterization of rad21 an essential gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe involved in DNA double-strand-break repair. Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 6605-6611.