Expanded interaction fingerprint method for analyzing ligand binding modes in docking and structure-based drug design

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 44, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1942-1951

  Kelly, Matthew D ^a   Mancera, Ricardo L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b De Novo Pharmaceuticals Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; HYDROGEN BONDS; HYDROPHOBICITY; PROTEINS;

BINDING MODES; DRUG-DESIGN METHODS; INTERACTION FINGERPRINT METHOD; LIGANDS;

DRUG DOSAGE;

EID: 10044263239     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci049870g     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Brooijmans, N.; Kuntz, I. D. Molecular Recognition and Docking Algorithms. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol Struct. 2003, 32, 335-373.
2. Glen, R. C.; Allen, S. C. Ligand-Protein Docking: Cancer Research at the Interface between Biology and Chemistry. Curr. Med. Chem. 2003, 10, 767-782.
3. Taylor, R. D.; Jewsbury, P. J.; Essex, J. W. A Review of Protein-Small Molecule Docking Methods. J. Comput.-Aided. Mol. Des. 2002, 16, 151-166.
4. Blaney, J. M.; Dixon, J. S. A Good Ligand is Hard to Find: Automated Docking Methods. Perp. Drug Discuss. Des. 1993, 1, 301-319.
5. Lyne, P. Structure-Based Virtual Screening: An Overview. Drug Discuss. Today. 2002, 7, 1047-1055.
6. Stahl, M.; Schulz-Gasch, T. Practical Database Screening with Docking Tools. Ernst Schering Res. Found. Workshop. 2003, 42, 127-151.
7. Stahl, M.; Todorov, N. P.; James, T.; Mauser, H.; Boehm, H.-J.; Dean, P. M. A Validation Study on the Practical Use of Automated de novo Design. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2002, 16, 459-478.
8. Lewis, R. A.; Leach, A. R. Current Methods for Site-Directed Structure Generation. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1994, 8, 467-475.
9. Stahl, M.; Rarey, M. Detailed Analysis of Scoring Functions for Virtual Screening. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 1035-1042.
10. Deng, Z.; Chuaqui, C.; Singh, J. Structural Interaction Fingerprint (SIFt): A Novel Method for Analysing Three-Dimensional ProteinLigand Binding Interactions. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 337-344.
11. Källblad, P.; Mancera, R. L.; Todorov, N. P. Assessment of Multiple Binding Modes in Ligand-Protein Docking. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 3334-3337.
12. Carhart, R. E.; Smith, D. H.; Venkataraghava, R. Atom Pairs as Molecular Features in Structure-Activity Studies: Definition and Applications. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1985, 25, 64-73.
13. Willett, P.; Winterman, V.; Bawden, D. Implementation of Nearest Neighbour Searching in an Online Chemical Structure Search System. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1986, 26, 36-41.
14. Hagadone, T. R. Molecular Substructure Similarity Searching: Efficient Retrieval in Two-Dimensional Structure Databases. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1992, 32, 515-521.
15. Chen, X.; Reynolds, C. H. Performance of Similarity Measures in 2D Fragment-Based Similarity Searching: Comparison of Structural Descriptors and Similarity Coefficients. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 1407-1414.
16. Fisanick, W.; Cross, K. P.; Rusinko, A. Similarity Searching on CAS Registry Substances. 1. Global Molecular Property and Generic Atom Triangle Geometric Searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1992, 32, 664-674.
17. Downs, G. M.; Willet, P.; Fisanick, W. 1994 Similarity Searching and Clustering of Chemical-Structure Databases Using Molecular Property Data. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 1094-1102.
18. Kearsley, S. K.; Sallamack, S.; Fluder, E. M.; Andose, J. D.; Mosley, R. T.; Sheriden, R. P. Chemical Similarity Using Physiochemical Property Descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 118-127.
19. Thorner, D. A.; Wild, D. J.; Willet, P.; Wright, P. M. Similarity Searching in Files of Three-Dimensional Chemical Structures: Flexible Field-Based Searching of Molecular Electrostatic Potentials. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 900-908.
20. Basak, S. C.; Magnuson, V. R.; Niemi, G. J.; Regal, R. R. Determining Structural Similarity of Chemicals Using Graph-Theoretic Indices. Discrete. Appl. Math. 1988, 19, 17-44.
21. Lewis, R. A.; Mason, J. S.; McLay, I. M. Similarity Measures for Rational Set Selection and Analysis of Combinatorial Libraries: The Diverse Property-Derived (DPD) Approach. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 559-614.
22. Brown, R. D.; Martin, Y. C. Use of Structure-Activity Data to Compare Structure-Based Clustering Methods and Descriptors for Use in Compound Selection. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 572-584.
23. Willet, P. Chemical Similarity Searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 983-996.
24. Holliday, J. D.; Salim, N.; Whittle, M.; Willet, P. Analysis and Display of the Size Dependence of Chemical Similarity Coefficients. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 819-828.
25. Whittle, M.; Willet, P.; Klaffke, W.; van-Noort, P. Evaluation of Similarity Measures For Searching the Dictionary of Natural Products Database. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 449-457.
26. Eldridge, M.; Murray, C. W.; Auton, T. A.; Paolini, G. V.; Lee, R. P. Empirical Scoring Functions: I. The Development of a Fast Empirical Scoring Function to Estimate the Binding Affinity of Ligands in Receptor Complexes. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1997, 11, 425-445.
27. Muegge, I.; Martin, Y. C. A General Fast Scoring Function for Protein-Ligand Interactions: A Simplified Potential Approach. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 791-804.
28. Kelly, M. D.; Mancera, R. L. A New Method For Estimating the Importance of Hydrogen-Bonding Groups in the Binding Site of a Protein. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2003, 17, 401-414.
29. Bruno, I. J.; Cole, J. C.; Lommerse, J. P. M.; Rowland, R. S.; Taylor, R.; Verdonk, M. L. IsoStar: A Library of Information about Nonbonded Interactions. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1997, 11, 525-537.
30. Bohm, H.-J. The Development of a Simple Empirical Scoring Function to Estimate the Binding Constant For a Protein-Ligand Complex of Known Three-Dimensional Structure. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1994, 8, 243-256.
31. Sokal, R. R.; Michener. C. D. A Statistical Method for Evaluating Systematic Relationships. Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 1958, 38, 1409-1438
32. Kortvelyesi, T.; Dennis, S.; Silberstein, M.; Brown, L.; Vajda, S. Algorithms for Computational Solvent Mapping of Proteins. Proteins: Struct., Fund., Genet. 2003, 51, 340-351.
33. Tanimoto, T. T. An Elementary Mathematical Theory of Classification and Prediction. IBM Internal Report; 1958.
34. Fligner, M. A.; Verducci, J. S.; Blower, P. E. A Modification of the Jaccard-Tanimoto Similarity Index for Diverse Selection of Chemical Compounds Using Binary Strings. Technometrics 2002, 0, 1-10.
35. Ward, J. H. Hierarchical Grouping to Optimise an Objective Function. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1963, 58, 236-244.
36. Mojena, R. Hierarchical Grouping Methods and Stopping Rules: An Evaluation. Comput. J. 1977, 20, 359-363.
37. Mancera, R. L.; Källblad, P.; Todorov, N. P. Ligand-Protein Docking Using A Quantum Stochastic Tunneling Optimization Method. J. Comput, Chem. 2004, 25, 858-864.
38. Nissink, J. W.; Murray, C.; Hartshorn, M.; Verdonk, M. L.; Cole, J. C.; Taylor, R. A New Test Set for Validating Predictions of Protein-Ligand Interaction. Proteins 2002, 49, 457-471.
39. Todorov, N. P.; Dean, P. M. A Branch-And-Bound Method for Optimal Atom-Type Assignment in de novo Ligand Design. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1998, 12, 335-349.
40. Todorov, N. P.; Dean, P. M. Evaluation of a Method for Controlling Molecular Scaffold Diversity in de novo Ligand Design. J. Comput.Aided Mol. Des. 1997, 11, 175-192.
41. Leppla, S. H. Anthrax Toxin Edema Factor: A Bacterial Adenylate Cycalse that Increases Cyclic AMP Concentrations Eukaryotic Cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1982, 79, 3162-3166.
42. O'Brien, J.; Friedlander, A.; Dreier, T.; Ezzell, J.; Leppla, S. Effects of Anthrax Toxin Components on Human Neutrophils. Infect. Immun. 1985,47, 306-310.
43. Duesbery, N. S.; Webb, C. P.; Leppla, S. H.; Gordon, V. M.; Kumpel, K. R.; Copeland, T. D., Ahn, N. G., Oskarsson, M. K., Fukasawa, K., Paull, K. D., Woude, V. Proteolytic Inactivation of MAP-Kinase-Kinase by Anthrax Lethal Factor. Infect. Immun. 1985, 47, 306-310.
44. Pellizzari, R.; Guidi-Rontani, C.; Vitale, G.; Mock, M.; Montecucco, C. Anthrax Lethal Factor Cleaves MKK3 in Macrophages and Inhibits the LPS/IFNgamma-induced Release of NO and TNFalpha. FEES Lett. 1999, 462, 199-204.
45. Friedlander, A. M. Macrophages are Sensitive to Anthrax Lethal Toxin Through an Acid-Dependent Process. J. Biol. Chem. 261, 7123-7126.
46. Petosa, C.; Collier, R. J.; Klimpel, K. R.; Leppla, S. H.; Liddington, R. C. Crystal Structure of the Anthrax Toxin Protective Antigen. Nature 1997, 385, 833-838.
47. Soelaiman, S.; Wei, B. Q.; Bergson, P.; Lee, Y.-S.; Shen, Y.; Mrksich, M.; Schoichet, B. K.; Tang, W.-J. Structure-Based Inhibitor Discovery Against Adenylyl Cyclase Toxins from Pathogenic Bacteria That Cause Anthrax and Whooping Cough. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 25990-25997.
48. Drum, C. L.; Yan, S.-Z.; Bard, J.; Shen, Y.-Q.; Lu, D.; Soelaiman, S.; Grabarek, Z.; Bohm, A.; Tang, W.-J. Structural Basis for the Activation of Anthrax Adenylyl Cyclase Exotoxin by Calmodulin. Nature 2002, 415, 396-402.