Structural Interaction Fingerprint (SIFt): A Novel Method for Analyzing Three-Dimensional Protein-Ligand Binding Interactions

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 337-344

  Deng, Zhan ^a   Chuaqui, Claudio ^a   Singh, Juswinder ^a  

^a BIOGEN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN KINASE INHIBITOR;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; COMPUTER MODEL; DATA BASE; DRUG DESIGN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DATA BANK; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN TARGETING; STRUCTURAL INTERACTION FINGERPRINT; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

BINDING SITES; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; DATABASES, FACTUAL; ENZYME INHIBITORS; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN KINASE INHIBITORS; PROTEIN KINASES; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 0346962971     PISSN: 00222623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jm030331x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Berman, H. M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T. N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I. N.; Bourne, P. E. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 235-242.
2. Blundell, T. L.; Jhoti, H.; Abell, C. High-throughput crystallography for lead discovery in drug design. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2002, 1, 45-54.
3. Lyne, P. Structure-based virtual screening: an overview. Drug Discovery Today 2002, 7 (20), 1047-1055.
4. Wallace, A. C.; Laskowski, R. A.; Thornton, J. M. LIGPLOT: a program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions. Protein Eng. 1995, 8, 127-134.
5. Deng, Z.; Chuaqui, C.; Singh, J. Patent application pending.
6. Wang, Z.; Canagarajah, B. J.; Boehm, J. C.; Kassisa, S.; Cobb, M. H.; Yong, P. R.; Abdel-Meguid, S.; Adams, J. L.; Goldsmith, E. J. Structural basis of inhibitor selectivity in MAP kinases. Structure 1998, 6 (9), 1117-1128.
7. Rarey, M.; Kramer, B.; Lengauer, T.; Klebe, G. A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 261, 470-489.
8. SYBYL, version 6.8; Tripos, Inc.: St. Louis, Missouri.
9. Eldridge, M.; Murray, C. W.; Auton, T. A.; Paolini, G. V.; Lee, R. P. Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1997, 11, 425-445.
10. Jones, G.; Willett, P.; Glen, R. C.; Leach, A. R.; Taylor, R. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 267, 727-748.
11. Muegge, I.; Martin, Y. C. A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42 (5), 791-804.
12. Gohlke, H.; Hendlich, M.; Klebe, G. Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 295, 337-356.
13. Charifson, P. S.; Corkery, J. J.; Murcko, M. A.; Walter, W. P. Consensus scoring: a method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into protein. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42 (25), 5100-5109.
14. Adams, J. L.; Lee, D. Recent progress towards the identification of selective inhibitors of serine/threonine protein kinases. Curr. Opin. Drug Discovery Dev. 1999, 2, 96-109.
15. Pearlman, D. A.; Charifson, P. S. Improved scoring of ligand-protein interactions using OWFEG free energy grids. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 502-511.
16. OMEGA; OpenEye Scientific Software, Inc.: Santa Fe, New Mexico.
17. Hanks, S. K.; Hunter, T. The eukaryotic protein kinase superfamily: kinase (catalytic) domain structure and classification. FASEB J. 1995, 9, 576-596.
18. Hanks, S. K.; Quinn, A. M. Protein kinase catalytic domain sequence database: identification of conserved features of primary structure and classification of family members. Methods Enzymol. 1991, 200, 38-62.
19. Lee, B.; Richards, F. M. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J. Mol. Biol. 1971, 55, 379-400.
20. Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4. The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. 1994, D50, 760-763.
21. McDonald, I. K.; Thornton, J. M. Satisfying hydrogen bonding potential in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1994, 238, 777-793.
22. Zheng, J. H.; Tranfny, E. A.; Knighton, D. R.; Xuong, N. H.; Taylor, S. S.; Teneyck, L. F.; Sowadski, J. M. 2.2 Å refined crystal structure of the catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase complexed with Mn-ATP and a peptide inhibitor. Acta Crystallogr. 1993, D49, 362-365.
23. Smith, C. M.; Shindyalov, I. N.; Veretnik, S.; Gribskov, M.; Taylor, S. S.; Ten Eyck, L. F.; Bourne, P. E. The protein kinase resource. TIBS 1997, 22 (11), 444-446.
24. Insight II; Accelrys Inc.: San Diego, CA.
25. Willet, P. Chemical similarity searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 983-996.
26. Dubes, R.; Jain, A. K. Clustering methodologies in exploratory data analysis. Adv. Comput. 1980, 19, 113-228.
27. MATLAB, version 6.5; The MathWorks, Inc.: Natick, MA.
28. Beyer, S. Bit:: Vector (Perl module); http://www.engelschall.com/ u/sb/download/.
29. Bissantz, C.; Folkers, G.; Rognan, D. Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases: 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 4759-4767.
30. Taylor, S. S.; Radzio-Andzelm, E. Three protein kinase structures define a common motif. Structure 1994, 2, 345-355.
31. Johnson, D. A.; Akamine, P.; Radzio-Andzelm, E.; Madhusudan; Taylor, S. S. Dynamics of cAMP-dependent protein kinases. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101 (8), 2243-2270.
32. Singh, J.; Chuaqui, C.; Boriack-Sjodin, P. A.; Lee, W. C.; Ponz, T.; Corbley, M. J.; Cheung, H. K.; Arduini, R. M.; Mead, J. N.; Newman, M. N.; Papadatos, J. L.; Bowes, S.; Josiah, S.; Ling, L. E. Successful shape-based virtual screening: The discovery of a potent inhibitor of the type-I TGFβ receptor kinase TβRI). Biorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, in press.