Assessment of multiple binding modes in ligand-protein docking

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Volumn 47, Issue 13, 2004, Pages 3334-3337

  Källblad, Per ^a   Mancera, Ricardo L ^a   Todorov, Nikolay P ^a  

^a De Novo Pharmaceuticals Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIGAND; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CALCULATION; DRUG DETERMINATION; DRUG PROTEIN BINDING; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS;

EID: 2942519283     PISSN: 00222623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jm0498147     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Glen, R. C.; Allen, S. C. Ligand-Protein Docking: Cancer Research at the Interface between Biology and Chemistry. Curr. Med. Chem. 2003, 10, 767-782.
2. Stahl, M.; Schulz-Gasch, T. Practical Database Screening with Docking Tools. Ernst Schering Res. Found. Workshop 2003, 42, 127-151.
3. Taylor, R. D.; Jewsbury, P. J.; Essex, J. W. A Review of Protein-Small Molecule Docking Methods. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2002, 16, 151-166.
4. Gehlaar, D. K.; Verkhivker, G. M.; Rejto, P. A.; Sherman, C. J.; Fogel, D. B.; Fogel, L. J.; Freer, S. T. Molecular recognition of the inhibitor AG-1343 by HIV-1 protease: conformationally flexible docking by evolutionary programming. Chem. Biol. 1995, 2, 317-324.
5. McMartin, C.; Bohacek, R. S. QXP: Powerful, rapid computer algorithms for structure-based drug design. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1997, 11, 333-344.
6. Wang, J.; Dixon, R.; Kollman, P. A. Ranking ligand binding affinities with avidin: A molecular dynamics-based interaction energy study. Proteins 1999, 34, 69-81.
7. Morris, G. M.; Goodsell, D. S.; Huey, R.; Olson, A. J. Distributed automated docking of flexible ligands to proteins: Parallel applications of AutoDock 2.4. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1996, 10, 293-304.
8. Merlitz, H.; Wenzel, W. Comparison of stochastic optimization methods for receptor-ligand docking. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 362, 271-277.
9. Merlitz, H.; Burghardt, B.; Wenzel, W. Application of the stochastic tunneling method to high throughput database screening. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003, 370, 68-73.
10. Verkhivker, G. M.; Bouzida, D.; Gehlhaar, D. K.; Rejto, P. A.; Freer, S. T.; Rose, P. W. Complexity and simplicity of ligand-macromolecule interactions: the energy landscape perspective. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2002, 12, 197-203.
11. Wang, J.; Verkhivker, G. M. Energy landscape theory, funnels, specificity and optimal criterion of biomolecular binding. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 90, 188101.
12. Rejto, P. A.; Verkhivker, G. M. Unraveling principles of lead discovery: From unfrustrated energy landscapes to novel molecular anchors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996, 93, 8945-8950.
13. Stahl, M.; Rarey, M. Detailed Analysis of Scoring Functions for Virtual Screening. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 1035-1042.
14. Wang, R.; Lu, Y.; Wang, S. Comparative Evaluation of 11 Scoring Functions for Molecular Docking. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 2287-2303.
15. Pérez, C.; Ortiz, A. R. Evaluation of Docking Functions for Protein-Ligand Docking. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 3768-3785.
16. Ajay; Murcko, M. A. Computational Methods To Predict Binding Free Energy in Ligand-Receptor Complexes. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 4953-4967.
17. Charifson, P. S.; Corkery, J. J.; Murcko, M. A.; Walters, W. P. Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 5100-5109.
18. Verkhivker, G. M.; Bouzida, D.; Gehlaar, D. K.; Rejto, P. A.; Schaffer, L.; Arthurs, S.; Colson, A. B.; Freer, S. T.; Larson, V.; Luty, B. A.; Marrone, T.; Rose, P. W. Hierarchy of Simulation Models in Predicting Structure and Energetics of the Src SH2 Domain Binding to Tyrosyl Phosphopeptides. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 72-89.
19. Paul, N.; Rognan, D. ConsDock: A new program for the consensus analysis of protein-ligand interactions. Proteins 2002, 47, 521-533.
20. Todorov, N. P.; Mancera, R. L.; Monthoux, P. H. A new quantum stochastic tunneling optimisation method for protein-ligand docking. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003, 369, 257-263.
21. Nissink, J. W. M.; Murray, C.; Hartshorn, M.; Verdonk, M. L.; Cole, J. C.; Taylor, R. A New Test Set for Validating Predictions of Protein-Ligand Interactions. Proteins 2002, 49, 457-471.
22. Hansmann, U. H. E. Protein folding simulations in a deformed energy landscape. Eur. Phys. J. B 1999, 12, 607-611.
23. Wenzel, W.; Hamacher, K. Stochastic tunneling approach for global minimization of complex potential energy landscapes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 82, 3003-3007.
24. Feynman, R. P.; Hibbs, A. R. Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1965.
25. Verdonk, M. L.; Cole, J. C.; Hartshorn, M. J.; Murray, C. W.; Taylor, R. D. Improved protein-ligand docking using GOLD. Proteins 2003, 52, 609-623.
26. Boehm, H. J.; Boehringer, M.; Bur, D.; Gmuender, H.; Huber, W.; Klaus, W.; Kostrewa, D.; Kuehne, H.; Luebbers, T.; Meunier-Keller, N.; Mueller, F. Novel inhibitors of DNA gyrase: 3D structure based biased needle screening, hit validation by biophysical methods, and 3D guided optimization. A promising alternative to random screening. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 2664-2674.